Policy Issues

Like-kind Exchanges


The ability to defer capital gain when a taxpayer exchanges one property for another is an essential feature of the current tax system that spurs capital investment, especially during times of market corrections and liquidity shortages. Like-kind exchanges under section 1031 of the tax code support capital expenditures and job growth, while also contributing to critical land conservation efforts and facilitating the  smooth functioning of real estate markets.



Real property like-kind exchanges were preserved in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and should be retained in any future tax reform efforts.

A recent virtual briefing on the economic importance of Section 1031 LKEs for members of Congress and their staff was held by a broad business coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable. See Roundtable Weekly for more information.

Urge your members of Congress to preserve Section 1031 like-kind exchanges by sending a message to your congressional delegation -- go to 1031 Builds America to share your experience with policymakers.

Talking Points

Since 1921, the tax code has allowed taxpayers to defer capital gain when exchanging real property used in a trade or business for property of a like kind. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 narrowed like-kind exchanges (section 1031) by disallowing their use in the case of personal property (art, collectibles, etc.). As part of his American Families Plan, President Biden has proposed restricting gain deferred through real estate like-kind exchanges to no more than $500,000 per-year, or $1 million in the case of a married couple. The President’s proposal would be effective for exchanges completed in tax years beginning after 2021.

  • After many years of careful legislating and regulatory rulemaking, policymakers have crafted a
    like-kind exchange provision that supports healthy real estate markets, and important social and
    environmental objectives, such as the preservation of family-owned farms and ranches and the
    conservation of land for the benefit of the public and future generations.
  • The reforms, such as strict timelines for exchanges, ensure it is used for its intended purpose and is not abused by taxpayers.
  • Like-kind exchanges allow businesses to grow organically, with less unsustainable debt, by
    reinvesting gains on a tax-deferred basis in new and productive assets. In this way, like-kind
    exchanges create a ladder of economic opportunity for minority-, veteran-, and women-owned
    businesses and cash-poor entrepreneurs that may lack access to traditional sources of financing.
  • Academic and outside research has found that exchanges spur capital expenditures, increase
    investment, create jobs for skilled tradesmen and others, reduce unnecessary economic risk, lower
    rents, and support property values.
  • Roughly 40 percent of like-kind exchanges involve rental housing. Section 1031 is an important
    source of capital for affordable and workforce housing. Like-kind exchanges help fill gaps in the
    financing of affordable housing that are unmet by the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC).
    In contrast to LIHTC, developers can use section 1031 to finance land acquisition costs for new
    affordable housing projects.
  • Like-kind exchanges provide critical financing to support economic development and investment
    in low-income, hard-hit, and distressed communities where outside sources of capital are less
    available. In addition, like-kind exchanges support vital public services (police, education, etc.) by
    boosting transfer, recording, and property tax revenue. Property taxes contribute nearly 3/4 of all
    local tax revenue.
  • Farmers, ranchers, and forest owners use like-kind exchanges to combine acreage, acquire highergrade
    land, mitigate environmental impacts, and otherwise improve operations.
  • Land conservation organizations rely on exchanges to preserve open spaces for public use or
    environmental protection.
  • Owners and the self-employed who do not have access to an employer-provided pension plan.
    Exchanges allow individuals approaching retirement to convert an active business into a reliable
    and long-term stream of retirement income.
  • Section 1031 is integral to the health of today’s real estate marketplace: somewhere between
    10-20 percent of all commercial real estate transactions involve a like-kind exchange. They help
    get languishing properties into the hands of new owners who will invest in job-creating capital
    expenditures and improvements that put properties to their best and most productive uses.
  • Exchanges helped stabilize property markets at the height of the COVID-19 lockdown and will
    facilitate a faster and smoother transition as many real estate assets are repurposed in the post-
    COVID economy.


What is a like-kind exchange? Like-kind exchange rules allow taxpayers to defer tax when they exchange one property held for investment or business use for other property of a “like kind.” These rules promote savings and investment, allow capital to flow freely and efficiently—ensuring its best use, encourage commerce and ultimately stimulate US economic growth and job creation.

  • Study: The Economic Impact of Repealing or Limiting Section Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges in Real Estate

    An in-depth study of the US commercial real estate market highlights the critical role that “like-kind exchanges” or “1031 exchanges” play in stabilizing rents, safeguarding property values and strengthening the economy. 

    As the first-of-its-kind study entitled, “The Economic Impact of Repealing or Limiting Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges in Real Estate,” confirms, like-kind exchange rules have led to a more dynamic real estate sector – one that encourages reinvestment and building improvement activity and allows real estate owners to better allocate resources. Furthermore, the rules lead to lower levels of debt in commercial and multifamily real estate markets. 

    Key findings include:

        • Like-kind exchanges encourage investment.  On average, taxpayers using a like-kind exchange acquire replacement property that is $305K-$422K more valuable than the relinquished property, while replacement properties without using an exchange are cheaper or of equal value.  

        • Like-kind exchanges contribute significant federal tax revenue.  In 34 percent of exchanges, some federal tax is paid in the year of the exchange. More importantly, over the long run, like-kind exchanges boost tax revenue because of the higher tax liability that arises in the years following the initial exchange. 

        • Like-kind exchanges lead to job creation.  Real estate acquired through a like-kind exchange is associated with greater investment and capital expenditures (i.e., job-creating property upgrades and improvements) than real estate acquired without the use of like-kind exchange. 

        • Like-kind exchanges result in less debt.  When the price of the replacement property is close to, or less, than the price of the relinquished property, like-kind exchanges result in a 10 percent reduction in borrowing, or leverage, at the time of the acquisition.

    Despite the significant benefits of like-kind exchanges, some policymakers have proposed eliminating them. The result would undermine the real estate marketplace, raise taxes and discourage job-creating property improvements.

    According to the study, if like-kind exchange rules are repealed:

        • Taxes would increase for thousands of commercial property owners.  For a typical property owner who defers his or her gain on a commercial property, repealing like-kind exchanges would raise the effective tax rate on the taxpayer’s investment (including rental income and gain; nine-year holding period) from 23 percent to 30 percent.

        • Property values would drop.  In order for a commercial property to generate the same rate of return for the investor (if section 1031 were repealed), prices would have to decline. In local markets and states with moderate levels of taxation, commercial property price would have to decline 8 to 12 percent to maintain required equity returns for investors expecting to use like-kind exchanges when disposing of properties. These price declines would reduce the wealth of a large cross-section of households and slow or stop construction in many local markets.

        • Rents would increase.  Over time, real rents would need to increase from 8 to 13 percent before new construction would be economically viable.  These higher rents would reduce the affordability of commercial space for both large and small tenants. The price declines and rent effects of eliminating real estate like-kind exchanges would be more pronounced in high-tax states.

        • Real estate sales activity would decline.  Like-kind exchanges increase the liquidity of the real estate market.  An analysis of 336,572 properties that were acquired and sold between 1997 and 2014 showed that properties involved in like-kind exchanges had significantly shorter holding periods.

    Like-kind exchange rules are integral to a strong and prosperous real estate market, stimulating job creation, investment and economic growth. As the study’s authors conclude:

    "Like-kind exchanges are associated with increased investment, shorter holding periods, and lower leverage … the removal of exchanges will lead to a decrease in investment, an increase in holding periods (decrease in liquidity) and increase in the use of leverage to finance acquisitions. These micro effects are likely to have macro-economic consequences as well. For example, decreased construction and investment activity in commercial real estate markets will depress employment in sectors and markets where like-kind exchanges are commonly used." 

    About the LKE Study: 

    The Economic Impact of Repealing or Limiting Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges in Real Estate,” was developed using the most comprehensive database of US commercial real estate activity in existence.  The full report (93-page .pdf) can be downloaded here.  You may also download the LKE fact sheet.

    About the Authors: 

    Authors Dr. David Ling (finance professor at the University of Florida’s Warrington College of Business and past president of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association) and Dr. Milena Petrova (finance professor at Syracuse University’s Whitman School of Management) analyzed more than 1.6 million real estate transactions over an 18-year period (1997 – 2014).  Combined, the total volume of the transaction (unadjusted for inflation) is $4.8 trillion.

Other Resources

Roundtable Weekly (Policy Newsletter & Archive)
Annual Report (Roundtable Accomplishments & Activities)
Policy Agenda (Roundtable Goals & Advocacy)