Lawmakers have removed the Section 899 provision known as the “revenge tax” from the reconciliation package after the Treasury Department secured an international tax agreement with G7 countries. The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) strongly advocated for changes to the measure, warning that the tax would have deterred foreign investment in U.S. commercial real estate and weakened capital formation. (AP News, June 26)

Why It Matters

• Congressional Republicans agreed Thursday to strike Section 899 from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the request of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who announced a “joint understanding” with other G7 nations that he said will protect American companies from foreign tax discrimination. (NYT, June 26)

• In a post on X, Sec. Bessent said the provision was no longer necessary after the U.S. and its partners in the G7 reached a “joint understanding … that defends American interests.” (The Hill, June 26)

• Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, “Congressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation.” (AP News, June 26)

• Section 899 would have raised U.S. taxes on inbound investment from countries with “unfair” tax regimes. RER and other industry groups told lawmakers that the mere proposal of the tax was chilling current foreign capital investment activity and warned that its enactment would substantially deter future investment, increase borrowing costs, and dampen property values.

• Earlier this week, Chairman Smith and White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett signaled that Section 899 could be removed from the bill if foreign governments—agreed to suspend policies like the Pillar Two global minimum tax and finalize related trade deals. (Reuters, June 25 | Bloomberg, June 25)

• The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) last week released a revised score showing that, under a Senate version of the bill, Section 899 would have raised only $12.5 billion over three years, compared to the $63 billion originally projected in the House version.

• The JCT estimate used the “current policy baseline” that assumes the extension of expiring tax provisions, lowing the bill’s total cost estimate to $442 billion. (Politico, June 22)

RER Advocacy

• RER has been at the forefront of the policy debate surrounding Section 899, strongly advocating for its elimination or revision. Following weeks of one-on-one meetings with policymakers, a delegation of RER members and their counsel met last week with leading Congressional tax staff.  

• The views expressed are summarized in comment letters submitted on June 12 and June 23 to congressional leaders, warning of its harmful impact on investment, job creation, and market stability. (Bisnow, June 25)

• “We commend congressional leaders and the Trump administration for removing Section 899 from the reconciliation bill,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, RER President and CEO. “This provision would have increased market volatility, discouraged inbound capital, and imposed higher borrowing costs on American real estate owners—ultimately reducing job creation, slowing economic growth, and diminishing U.S. competitiveness. Its removal helps preserve access to foreign capital and supports continued investment in communities across the country.”

• RER this week joined a coalition of leading trade groups representing private equity, managed funds, and the securities industries in urging the Senate to include a passive investment exemption in Section 899—a provision in both the House and Senate tax bills that would have raised taxes on inbound investment from countries with “discriminatory” tax regimes. (Letter, June 23) (Bisnow, June 25)

• “The threat of Section 899 is already having a chilling effect on investment decisions,” said Ryan McCormick, RER’s SVP & Counsel. “These investors are highly mobile, so rather than paying the higher tax rate, they will simply invest elsewhere.” (Bisnow, June 25)

• The coalition letter states, “Applying Section 899 to all forms of inbound passive investment would result in a significant increase in market volatility and a decline in investment in U.S. companies and our capital markets.” (Pensions&Investments, June 24)

• RER also sent a letter on June 12 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Finance Committee Chair Crapo, calling for changes to the Section 899 tax proposal and cautioningthat without changes, the measure could potentially drive up borrowing costs, depress property values, and significantly deter foreign investment in housing, commercial developments, and infrastructure projects nationwide. (Letter, June 12 | RW, June 23)

The removal of Section 899 represents a meaningful policy outcome for commercial real estate, helping to protect investment flows and market stability. RER will continue working with Congress to ensure the final tax package supports capital formation, economic growth, and job creation.