The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) submitted comments on Aug. 19 to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recommending changes to proposed regulations implementing the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (RIA). RER urged revisions to three provisions in USCIS’s proposal that could limit EB-5’s effectiveness as a source of capital for job-creating real estate and economic development projects.  (Letter, Aug. 19)

The Proposal

• Published July 2, Ensuring the Integrity of the EB-5 Program (Docket No. USCIS-2026-0100) is USCIS’s first proposed rule implementing the 2022 law. (Federal Register) 

• The proposed rule would change the program’s treatment of bridge financing, expand “source of funds” reviews to non-EB-5 capital, and establish a new $1.4 million investment tier for projects in “high employment areas.” (Letter, Aug. 19)

RER Recommendations

RER urged USCIS to:

• Maintain the longstanding treatment of bridge financing. Bridge financing addresses the timing mismatch between when a project requires immediate capital and when longer-term capital becomes available. RER urged USCIS not to cap, eliminate or time-limit the amount of repaid bridge financing that can support qualifying EB-5 job creation. (Letter, Aug. 19)

• Apply “source of funds” requirements only to EB-5 capital. The RIA does not support applying these requirements to every component of a project’s financing. It would be impractical for an EB-5 investor to document the ultimate source of funds supporting institutional bank loans, pension fund investments and other capital the investor neither owns nor controls. (Letter, Aug. 19)

• Congress delegated responsibilities to other agencies— not USCIS—to monitor avenues of illicit overseas finance regarding non-EB-5 capital.

• Reject the proposed $1.4 million investment tier for “high employment areas.” RER warned that the new category would place urban and suburban projects at a competitive disadvantage and could impede affordable and low-income housing development, working against the goals Congress set in the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act enacted in July. (Letter, Aug. 19)

Why It Matters

• Real estate and infrastructure projects typically depend on multiple, interrelated sources of capital with different risk profiles, financing terms, and deployment timelines.

• Denying job-creation credit solely because temporary bridge financing preceded an EB-5 investment would elevate form over substance.

• EB-5 policy should focus on whether the capital supports a qualifying project that creates U.S. jobs, not the sequence in which each component of the project’s capital stack was deployed.

What’s Next

USCIS will review public comments before issuing a final rule. RER will continue advocating for an EB-5 framework that maintains program integrity while supporting capital formation, housing production, economic development and U.S. job creation.