Lawmakers have removed the Section 899 provision known as the “revenge tax” from the reconciliation package after the Treasury Department secured an international tax agreement with G7 countries. The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) strongly advocated for changes to the measure, warning that the tax would have deterred foreign investment in U.S. commercial real estate and weakened capital formation. (AP News, June 26)

Why It Matters

• Congressional Republicans agreed Thursday to strike Section 899 from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the request of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who announced a “joint understanding” with other G7 nations that he said will protect American companies from foreign tax discrimination. (NYT, June 26)

• In a post on X, Sec. Bessent said the provision was no longer necessary after the U.S. and its partners in the G7 reached a “joint understanding … that defends American interests.” (The Hill, June 26)

• Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, “Congressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation.” (AP News, June 26)

• Section 899 would have raised U.S. taxes on inbound investment from countries with “unfair” tax regimes. RER and other industry groups told lawmakers that the mere proposal of the tax was chilling current foreign capital investment activity and warned that its enactment would substantially deter future investment, increase borrowing costs, and dampen property values.

• Earlier this week, Chairman Smith and White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett signaled that Section 899 could be removed from the bill if foreign governments—agreed to suspend policies like the Pillar Two global minimum tax and finalize related trade deals. (Reuters, June 25 | Bloomberg, June 25)

• The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) last week released a revised score showing that, under a Senate version of the bill, Section 899 would have raised only $12.5 billion over three years, compared to the $63 billion originally projected in the House version.

• The JCT estimate used the “current policy baseline” that assumes the extension of expiring tax provisions, lowing the bill’s total cost estimate to $442 billion. (Politico, June 22)

RER Advocacy

• RER has been at the forefront of the policy debate surrounding Section 899, strongly advocating for its elimination or revision. Following weeks of one-on-one meetings with policymakers, a delegation of RER members and their counsel met last week with leading Congressional tax staff.  

• The views expressed are summarized in comment letters submitted on June 12 and June 23 to congressional leaders, warning of its harmful impact on investment, job creation, and market stability. (Bisnow, June 25)

• “We commend congressional leaders and the Trump administration for removing Section 899 from the reconciliation bill,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, RER President and CEO. “This provision would have increased market volatility, discouraged inbound capital, and imposed higher borrowing costs on American real estate owners—ultimately reducing job creation, slowing economic growth, and diminishing U.S. competitiveness. Its removal helps preserve access to foreign capital and supports continued investment in communities across the country.”

• RER this week joined a coalition of leading trade groups representing private equity, managed funds, and the securities industries in urging the Senate to include a passive investment exemption in Section 899—a provision in both the House and Senate tax bills that would have raised taxes on inbound investment from countries with “discriminatory” tax regimes. (Letter, June 23) (Bisnow, June 25)

• “The threat of Section 899 is already having a chilling effect on investment decisions,” said Ryan McCormick, RER’s SVP & Counsel. “These investors are highly mobile, so rather than paying the higher tax rate, they will simply invest elsewhere.” (Bisnow, June 25)

• The coalition letter states, “Applying Section 899 to all forms of inbound passive investment would result in a significant increase in market volatility and a decline in investment in U.S. companies and our capital markets.” (Pensions&Investments, June 24)

• RER also sent a letter on June 12 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Finance Committee Chair Crapo, calling for changes to the Section 899 tax proposal and cautioningthat without changes, the measure could potentially drive up borrowing costs, depress property values, and significantly deter foreign investment in housing, commercial developments, and infrastructure projects nationwide. (Letter, June 12 | RW, June 23)

The removal of Section 899 represents a meaningful policy outcome for commercial real estate, helping to protect investment flows and market stability. RER will continue working with Congress to ensure the final tax package supports capital formation, economic growth, and job creation.

Senate Republicans are racing to rewrite significant portions of their sweeping reconciliation bill in an effort to vote before the July 4 recess. Parliamentarian rulings, unresolved tax and Medicaid issues, and opposition from fiscal hawks and House conservatives are testing the goal of delivering the legislation to President Trump’s desk by the holiday.

State of Play

• “We’ll have you out of here by the Fourth of July,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) told reporters Thursday.

• Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has ruled that several provisions violate reconciliation rules, including proposed changes to Medicaid financing and certain tax offsets.

• Republicans must now revise or replace those sections while managing disagreements over state provider taxes, energy tax incentives, and the deductibility of state and local taxes (SALT).

• The earliest a Senate vote could begin is Saturday, followed by a “vote-a-rama” and potential final passage on Sunday. The House has pledged a 48-hour notice before any floor vote, meaning the earliest action could occur Monday evening. (Roll Call, June 24)

• “I remain very optimistic that there’s not going to be a wide chasm between the two products, what the Senate produces and what we produce. We all know what the touchpoints are, the areas of greatest concern,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said.

Energy Tax Incentives

• Several Senate Republicans are pushing to soften proposed rollbacks to the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) energy tax credits. (PoliticoPro, June 23)

• The Senate Finance Committee’s current version seeks to phase out IRA credits faster than Democrats’ 2022 law but retains more favorable provisions than the House bill, including construction-based eligibility rules. (PoliticoPro – Analysis, June 24)

• Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) said Thursday that she was focusing on ensuring Senate Finance language allowing projects to receive credits based on when they begin construction remains in the bill. Conservatives are seeking to return to more restrictive language passed by the House that would determine eligibility based on when those projects start producing electricity. (PoliticoPro, June 27)

• “I want to make sure ‘commence construction’ is in place versus ‘placed in service.’ That’s really important,” said Sen. Murkowski.

• However, fiscal conservatives remain opposed to extending energy subsidies, and Democrats continue to warn that weakening IRA incentives could threaten grid reliability as demand surges from data centers and AI-related power needs. (NYT, June 26)

RER Homeland Security Task Force Engaged Amid Iran Conflict

• RER’s HSTF is actively coordinating with public and private partners in response to heightened geopolitical risks stemming from the conflict with Iran.

• Under the oversight of the HSTF, the RE-ISAC, serves as the primary conduit of terrorism, cyber and natural hazard warning and response information between the government and the commercial facilities sector. (RW, June 13)

• At RER’s 2025 Annual Meeting, geopolitical expert John Sitilides gave a presentation titled “Washington & the World: The New Geopolitics of Great Power Competition,” where he discussed the geopolitical implications of tariffs, NATO relations, and strategic U.S. interests, including maritime security. (RW, May 30)

• Through the HSTF and RE-ISAC, RER remains engaged in preparedness efforts, emphasizing resilience across the industry and monitoring evolving threats that could affect the nation’s infrastructure and operations.

Congress is expected to work through the weekend as Senate leaders try to finalize the reconciliation package and set up potential floor votes before the July 4 recess.

As Congress works to meet a July 4 deadline for sweeping reconciliation legislation, The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) and partner organizations are calling on Senate leaders to align with House-passed tax measures that strengthen Main Street businesses by expanding the Section 199A deduction, protecting the Opportunity Zones program, and advancing a lower capital gains rate to drive long-term investment.

Section 199A

• RER and nearly 100 other organizations sent a letter to Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-ID), calling for the Senate to follow the House’s lead in expanding the Section 199A deduction from 20% to 23%. (PoliticoPro, June 26)

• The Senate version originally would have made the deduction permanent but limited SALT deductibility, resulting in higher effective tax rates for many pass-throughs. But in a positive development announced today by Punchbowl News, Senate Republicans plan to entirely drop those new limits as part of a pending deal with the House GOP.

• The House approach would maintain tax parity with C corporations and help ensure that small businesses—including real estate partnerships—can continue to invest, grow, and hire.

• “Expanding Section 199A will help preserve tax parity between pass-through businesses and larger public corporations while helping ensure the Senate bill does not raise taxes on millions of Main Street businesses,” the coalition wrote. (Letter, June 25 )

Opportunity Zones

• Using the “current policy baseline,” the Opportunity Zone program is now projected to generate $66 billion in savings rather than costing $7.5 billion under traditional estimates, making it appear as a revenue raiser rather than a tax cut. (PoliticoPro, June 27)

• Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said,  “We need a current policy baseline to make tax cuts permanent, and we need Opportunity Zones to help urban and rural poor areas, so we’ll just press on — no matter what.”

Capital Gains Bill Introduced

• Reps. French Hill (R-AR) and Greg Steube (R-FL) introduced the Revitalizing Investment, Savings, and Entrepreneurship (RISE) Act to lower the top federal capital gains rate to 15%, aiming to boost investment and long-term economic growth. (Rep. Hill Press Release, June 24)

• The RISE Act would restore a bipartisan policy that was in place from 2003 to 2012.

• “To build a stronger, more prosperous future, we need policies that unlock capital, reward risk-taking, and drive real growth for all Americans. That is exactly what the RISE Act delivers,” said Rep. Hill.

As negotiations continue, RER remains focused on advancing tax policies that foster capital formation, protect real estate investment, and support Main Street employers nationwide.

In a busy week for Fed policy, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell delivered his semiannual monetary policy report to Congress, testifying at a pair of House and Senate hearings on the state of the U.S. economy. Powell also fielded questions from policymakers on a new proposal unveiled this week to ease capital requirements for large banks and the state of Basel III Endgame.

Policy Outlook

• In testimony before the House Financial Services Committee and Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, Chair Powell defended the Fed’s decision to hold interest rates steady last week. (Roundtable Weekly, June 20)
  
  
• With consumer confidence weakening and inflation risks from tariffs and Middle East tensions rising, the Fed faces competing pressures that could challenge price stability.

• On Capitol Hill this week, Chair Powell reiterated the Fed’s wait-and-see approach, saying, “For the time being, we are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.” (Federal Reserve, June 24)

• Two Trump-appointed Fed officials, Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and board member Christopher Waller, signaled support for cutting interest rates as soon as July. Their public stance diverges from the majority of Fed officials, seven of whom do not anticipate any rate cuts this year, highlighting an unusual divergence among Fed leadership. (Axios, June 24)

The Fed’s New Proposal

• On Wednesday, the Fed advanced a proposal to reform the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) in a 5-2 vote, which would reduce capital requirements for relatively low-risk assets, like U.S. Treasury markets. (Reuters, June 25)
  
• The SLR was originally designed as a backstop to risk-based capital requirements to ensure that large banks hold a sufficient amount of capital, regardless of the riskiness of those assets. (ABA Journal, June 23)

• Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), Chair of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, noted at the Senate hearing with Chair Powell, the backstop has “too often” acted as a binding requirement for U.S. banks, which could harm the effective functioning of U.S. Treasury markets during periods of distress and discourage banks from engaging in low-risk activity.

• The proposed modifications are intended to make it less expensive for large banks to hold less risky assets, so that more capital is freed up for banks to invest in Treasuries and other low-risk markets.
  
  
• Vice Chair Bowman touted the proposal as an “important first step in balancing the stability of the financial system and Treasury market resilience, while preserving safety and soundness and restoring the SLR as a backstop.” (PoliticoPro, June 25)
  
  
• Chair Powell similarly highlighted the benefits of the reform proposal, noting that “it will not in any way diminish the safety and soundness of the financial system.” (Senate Hearing, June 25)
  
  
• The Fed published a notice of proposed rulemaking on the proposal, opening it for public comment.

• RER plans to comment on the proposal and its implications for the commercial real estate industry.  The organization’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) is working on a response to the notice of proposed rulemaking and welcomes member input.

Basel III Endgame

• Chair Powell was also asked about the Fed’s plans for Basel III Endgame, which stalled after the proposal was met with widespread criticism from policymakers and industry associations last year.
  
  
• Chair Powell told policymakers that the Fed would take a “fresh start” at Basel III in light of the feedback it received. He agreed that the original proposal’s capital requirements were excessive and “very significantly exceeded” the Basel requirements, suggesting that it will be further revised. (American Banker, June 25)
  
  
• RER strongly opposed the original Basel III proposal, pointing out the significant economic costs it would incur without clear benefits to the economy, recommending that it be withdrawn and only reissued after further study.

• Bowman, the newly appointed Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve, is actively involved in reviewing and potentially reforming the Basel III endgame proposal to make it more capital-neutral for U.S. banks.

• Tighter capital requirements and higher costs would come at a time when the commercial real estate industry is facing a wave of maturing loans, undermining the ability of owners and developers to restructure debt and fill the equity gap. So it is important for the Agencies to recalibrate their proposal accordingly to avert increased borrowing costs and reduced credit capacity for real estate and the overall economy.

Chair Powell’s term at the Fed isn’t up until May 2026—but reports indicate that President Trump is considering announcing his pick to succeed Powell far in advance, potentially a candidate who is more amenable to lowering interest rates on an accelerated timeline.