Tag: Section 892 Regulations

Treasury Signals Revisions for Proposed Section 892 Rules After Industry Feedback

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The U.S. Department of the Treasury is revising its proposed Section 892 regulations after the investment and real estate industries raised concerns that aspects of the framework could raise their cost of capital by deterring passive investment by foreign governments, including sovereign wealth funds.

State of Play

  • A Treasury Department spokesperson told Bloomberg Law the agency is “revising the proposal to address key issues and ensure it supports stable, long-term capital flows,” citing feedback from the investment and real estate industry, including The Real Estate Roundtable (RER). (Bloomberg Law, Feb. 20)
  • The proposed Section 892 regulations (REG-101952-24) address two critical questions that can trigger U.S. tax liability: when a foreign government has effective control of an entity engaged in commercial activities, and when an acquisition of debt by a foreign government is considered to be commercial activity.
  • Treasury tax policy officials also indicated the proposed regulations—if finalized—will not be applied retroactively to existing transactions and structures. (Tax Notes, Feb. 23)

RER Advocacy

  • Earlier this month, RER submitted a comment letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on the Section 892 final and proposed rules, urging clear grandfathering rules and changes to prevent disruptions to sovereign investment in U.S. real estate. (Letter, Feb. 12)
  • The letter recommended targeted fixes, including clarifying that customary minority protections do not create effective control; confirming that withholding agents may rely on foreign government self-certifications; and adding safe harbors (including for certain distressed-debt modifications).
  • RER’s recommendations would ensure U.S. real estate owners and developers can continue to mobilize capital from foreign government sources while preserving Section 892’s fundamental distinction between tax-exempt investment activities and taxable commercial activities. (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 13)

RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) Advocacy

  • The letter was developed by TPAC’s Section 892 Working Group, which includes representatives from a diverse group of foreign investors, U.S. real estate sponsors, and outside advisors.The principal drafter was TPAC member and Skadden partner Nickolas Gianou.

RER will continue engaging Treasury to ensure the final Section 892 regulations do not discourage sovereign capital that supports U.S. real estate investment and jobs.

Roundtable Urges Treasury to Modify Proposed Regulations on Sovereign Investment in U.S. Real Estate

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) submitted a comment letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Treasury’s recently issued Section 892 regulations and related proposed rules that could materially affect sovereign investment in U.S. real estate. (Letter, Feb. 12)

Why It Matters

  • Foreign investment, including investment by sovereign wealth funds, foreign pension funds, and other government entities, is a critical source of financing for capital-intensive U.S. real estate projects.
  • Since 2011, foreign governmental investors have invested over $100 billion in U.S. commercial real estate.
  • “This patient and long-duration foreign capital drives ambitious and transformative investments that create new housing supply, lower housing costs, and spur job growth and economic opportunity in American cities,” wrote Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer.
  • Section 892 generally exempts from U.S. tax certain dividend and interest income—and gains on sales of securities—earned by foreign governments, unless the income is treated as commercial activity income or income from a controlled commercial entity. The provision traces back to 1917.
  • On Dec. 15, Treasury released final Section 892 regulations and issued new proposed regulations addressing two key questions: (1) when a foreign government has effective control of an entity engaged in commercial activities, and (2) when an acquisition of debt is considered commercial activity.
  • These issues have important consequences for existing and future sovereign investment in U.S. real estate.

RER Recommendations

  • The RER letter commends Treasury for its general approach and for clarifying specific issues. At the same time, RER expressed concerns regarding aspects of the proposed regulations that could disrupt inbound real estate investment and raise the cost of capital for U.S. real estate projects.
  • For example, the proposed rules can be read to restrict foreign governmental investors’ ability to secure certain investor protections, such as veto rights over major investment and financing decisions. Such restrictions could deter and discourage foreign governments from investing in the United States.
  • The letter highlights these concerns while offering specific solutions that Treasury could incorporate in its final rulemaking. These include:
  • Clarifying that customary minority investor veto rights do not create effective control;
  • Grandfathering existing investments;
  • Confirming U.S. withholding agents can rely on self-certifications from foreign governments;
  • Clarifying that certain modifications of distressed debt are not commercial activity; and
  • Establishing debt-related safe harbors for specific situations.
  • In short, RER’s recommendations would ensure U.S. real estate owners and developers can continue to mobilize capital from foreign government sources while preserving Section 892’s fundamental distinction between tax-exempt investment activities and taxable commercial activities.

RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) Advocacy

  • The letter was developed by TPAC’s Section 892 Working Group, which includes representatives from a diverse group of foreign investors, U.S. real estate sponsors, and outside advisors. The principal drafter was TPAC member and Skadden partner Nickolas Gianou.

The current Administration and Treasury leadership have emphasized the importance of passive foreign investment to U.S. job creation and growth. Treasury has not yet indicated when it anticipates finalizing the new Section 892 proposed regulations.