Category: Capital and Credit

Federal Reserve Expands Emergency Capital Liquidity Facilities; Industry Coalitions Urge Inclusion of Non-Agency CMBS & Relief for COVID-19 Loan Modifications

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Fed Reserve WikiCommons x475

The Federal Reserve took unprecedented actions this week to aggressively support markets in an attempt to contain the economic damage of the coronavirus pandemic – announcing it is “committed to using its full range of tools to support households, businesses and the U.S. economy overall in this challenging time.”  (New York Times, March 23)

  • After the Fed last week cut the federal fund rate to zero and re-started its Quantitative Easing program, it established several new credit facilities this week aimed at injecting a massive liquidity flow to various sectors of the economy.  (Roundtable Weekly, March 20)
  • According to a March 23 Fed statement, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) “will purchase Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities in the amounts needed to support smooth market functioning and effective transmission of monetary policy to broader financial conditions and the economy.  In addition, the FOMC will include purchases of agency commercial mortgage-backed securities in its agency mortgage-backed security purchases.”
  • Loans, loan guarantees, and other investments will be made available by the Fed through its recently established credit facilities:
  1. Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF)
  2. Primary Dealer Credit Facility(PDCF)
  3. Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility(MMLF)
  4. Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility(PMCCF)
  5. Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility(SMCCF)
  6. Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility(TALF) 
  7. Main Street Business Lending Program (pending establishment)

The Fed’s new credit facilities will be backed by the Treasury Department’s Exchange Stabilization Fund, which was allocated $454 billion in the congressional coronavirus economic rescue package signed by President Trump today.

TALF, Private-Label CMBS, and Mortgage Servicers Task Force

The Fed’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) credit facility, previously used during the 2008 financial crisis, was relaunched on March 23 to “enable the issuance of asset-backed securities (ABS) backed by student loans, auto loans, credit card loans, loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA), and certain other assets.”  (Fed news release, March 23)

  • This week also saw two key actions affecting Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) by the Fed, Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which regulates Fannie and Freddie.  Agency CMBS are securities backed by mortgages on commercial and multifamily properties guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
  • First, the Fed announced it extended its support of financial markets to include agency CMBS, retaining BlackRock Financial Markets Advisory to begin purchasing securities today.
  • Second, FHFA authorized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to provide agency CMBS investors with short-term financing of their positions, providing liquidity to these investors.
  • While the TALF now includes Agency CMBS, non-agency CMBS and other certain other commercial assets are currently excluded.  (GlobeSt. Fed Announces Unlimited Bond Purchases, Will Buy Apartment CMBS, March 23)
  • An industry coalition, including The Real Estate Roundtable, on March 24 urged the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Federal Housing Finance Agency to expand the TALF to include non-agency CMBS – including legacy private-label conduit and single-asset single borrower (SASB) assets. The coalition states the inclusion of private-label assets would stabilize asset prices and shore up the balance sheets of market participants.  (Joint Industry letter, March 24)

  • The letter notes, “CMBS is a visible proxy for real estate loans, where banks, life companies, and other lenders have significant exposure.”  The coalition letter also explains that investors in both Agency and private-label CMBS include public pension funds for many employees at the frontlines of the crisis (hospitals, firefighters, police, and teachers).
  • Separately, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on March 26 said he has formed a task force of U.S. financial regulators on how to respond to a severe liquidity shortfall facing mortgage service firms, who collect monthly payments from borrowers and facilitate payments to mortgage bond investors.  (GlobeSt, March 27)
  • Most mortgage servicers are nonbank firms that do not currently have access to emergency lending from the Federal Reserve.  Despite an anticipated wave of forbearance requests from borrowers, mortgage servicers remain obligated to advance funds to investors – the owners of most of the nation’s $11 trillion residential mortgages. The Mortgage Bankers Association estimates that if 25% of borrowers ask to postpone their payments for six months, the cost could exceed $75 billion.  (Bloomberg Law, March 26) 

Secretary Mnuchin has asked the task force of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which also includes the heads of the Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission, for recommendations by March 30. (Wall Street Journal, March 26)

Relief from Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) Label

The Fed joined the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and other banking regulators in a March 22 Interagency Statement that encourages banks to avoid automatically categorizing short-term loan modifications linked to the COVID-19 crisis as a Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR).  The joint statement also encourages borrowers experiencing cash flow problems due to the pandemic to reach out to any FDIC-insured lenders about modifying their loans, without adverse consequences to the bank or the borrower that traditionally come with the TDR label.

  • According to the Statement, “Short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief are not TDRs.  This includes short-term — for example, six months — modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or other delays in payment that are insignificant.”
  • A separate coalition that also includes The Real Estate Roundtable wrote to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners on March 25 to request clarifying guidance that would relieve mortgage loan modifications linked to COVID-19 from the classification as a TDR.

  • The letter informed NAIC, “Servicers for mortgages held by life insurance companies are fielding pressing calls from borrowers seeking temporary relief due to the impact of COVID-19.” 
  • The coalition emphasizes that clarifying guidance from NAIC will “better enable life insurance companies to work prudently and swiftly with borrowers; mitigate COVID-19 impacts on borrowers, life insurance companies and the nation’s economy; and ultimately lead to improved loan performance and reduced credit risk.” (View Letter)
  • Language that supports the efforts of regulators and lenders to work on loan modifications with borrowers affected by the pandemic is also included in the $2 trillion dollar coronavirus response legislation.
  • Real Estate Roundtable Jeffrey DeBoer commented on how lenders may react to in an article yesterday in GlobeSt entitled, “Where CRE Liquidity Stands Today.”  
  • “Congress can’t tell them what to do, but the FDIC has issued a statement giving banks more leeway in modifying loans without having to label the loan as a TDR. There are efforts underway to get the NAIC to issue a similar statement for life companies. All of this is positive,” DeBoer said. “And in turn, we are trying to make sure when property owners try to meet their obligation their lenders will allow flexibility.”
  • On March 24, The Real Estate Roundtable called on all owners and operators of business and residential rental real estate to voluntarily, proactively work in a positive and constructive manner with their COVID-19 impacted tenants respecting current rent obligations.  (Roundtable news release, March 24)

As fast-moving coronavirus developments continue to roil markets, The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital and Credit Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will continue to provide constructive recommendations as The Roundtable continues to communicate the industry’s ongoing concerns about the crisis to policymakers and regulators.

#  #  # 

Central Banks Expand Liquidity As Coronovirus Economic Toll Expands; Trump Meets With Hotel CEOs

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Fed Reserve WikiCommons x475

The Federal Reserve and central banks around the world conducted urgent large-scale interventions in capital markets this week to ease strains on economies and investors as the economic toll of the coronavirus expanded dramatically in the U.S.

  • The Fed, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and central banks in Asia pumped large amounts of liquidity into markets, cut benchmark interest rates and engaged in new bond-buying programs to help arrest the sudden drop in business activity and increase in unemployment rates.  (Wall Street Journal, March 20 and Fed news releases)
  • Fed Chairman Jay Powell said on Sunday, “We are prepared to use our full range of tools to support the flow of credit to households and businesses.”  (Reuters, March 15 and Washington Post, March 20)
  • Additionally, the central bank announced an effort to improve the liquidity of U.S. dollar swaps by increasing the frequency of 7-day maturity operations from weekly to daily – done in coordination with the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank, and the Swiss National Bank (Fed Press release)
  • The Fed also announced the creation of numerous lending facilities to backstop the credit market, including the:
    • Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (Fed Press release) 
  • To support the issuance of more debt by states and cities in the coming weeks and months, the Fed today announced an expansion of its asset purchases to include municipal bonds – through the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility. (Fed Press release).
  • Market interventions by other nations this week included The European Central Bank (ECB), which on March 18 launched an €750 billion ($820 billion) emergency private and public bond program.  Today, Christine Lagarde, President of the ECB, addressed the program’s specifics and other actions the ECB will take.  “We are fully prepared to increase the size of our asset purchase programmes and adjust their composition, by as much as necessary and for as long as needed. We will explore all options and all contingencies to support the economy through this shock,” Lagarde said.  (ECB Blog, March 20)

Hotels and Malls Hit By Coronavirus Economic Shocks

The economic shockwaves of the coronavirus pandemic are quickly affecting operations of major U.S. hotel chains and other aspects of the commercial real estate industry.

  • CEOs of Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt and other chains met Tuesday with President Donald Trump to describe the virus’ impact.
  • Former Roundtable Chairman and Hilton Worldwide CEO Chris Nassetta told the president that Hilton plans to temporarily suspend operations at most of its hotels located in major U.S. cities – and that he expects global occupancy rates to fall to as low as 10%.   (View meeting of Hotel CEOs and President Trump, with transcript, on C-Span)
  • Nassetta added that in Hilton’s 100-year history, it has never closed a hotel except for remodeling or demolition.  “I’ve been doing this for 35 years. Never seen anything like it,” Nassetta told Trump.
  • At the meeting’s conclusion, United States Travel Association President Roger Dow told President Trump, “I would like to put together what everyone has said here.  The numbers are $355 billion is what we’re going to lose, 4.6 million employees will be out of work, and we’re predicting unemployment will go to 6.3 percent.  So, it’s now — it’s serious.” (C-Span video and transcript)
  • Another CRE sector deeply affected by the outbreak is retail.  On March 18, Simon Property Group announced it would temporarily close all of its retail properties, including Malls, Premium Outlets and Mills in the U.S until March 28 to address the spread of COVID-19.  (Simon statement)

The Roundtable is in contact with its membership to assess the widespread repercussions of the crisis and will report its findings to policymakers to help formulate targeted policies to combat the pandemic.

# #  #

Central Banks Around the World Move to Combat Economic Fallout of Coronavirus

Posted on by Trey Jackson

WHO world map coronavirus

Central banks around the world took dramatic action this week to mitigate the economic fallout of the coronavirus pandemic. 

  • The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announced a bold move yesterday to pump a series of cash injections totaling more than $1.5 trillion of temporary market liquidity into markets and begin buying longer-term bonds.  
  • This week’s actions are designed to mitigate investor fears as the Dow Jones industrial average plummeted more than 2,300 points yesterday – a 10 percent drop that is the worst one-day decline since the 1987 crash.  (Wall Street Journal and Federal Reserve Bank of New York, March 12)
  • “These changes are being made to address highly unusual disruptions in Treasury financing markets associated with the coronavirus outbreak,” the New York Fed said in its March 12 announcement.  The short-term funding move was directed by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, in consultation with the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. (Los Angeles Times, March 12)
  • The Fed’s substantial intervention opens the door to a resumption of bond-buying stimulus known as quantitative easing used during the financial crisis of 2008.
  • U.S. central bankers meet are scheduled to meet next week in Washington, when they could move to slash rates again after implementing an emergency half-percentage-point cut last week.
  • Economists widely expect another quarter-point rate cut at the Fed’s March 18 meeting, if not more, from the current range of 1% to 1.25% (Roundtable Weekly, March 6 and BGov, March 12)

European Central Bank and Individual Nations Respond

After the US Federal Reserve and Bank of England announced aggressive rate cuts in recent days to stimulate their respective economies, the European Central Bank (ECB) left its key interest rate unchanged at minus 0.5%. 

  • Instead, ECB President Christine Lagarde said the central bank would move forward with its $2.9 trillion (2.6 trillion euro) bond purchase program, while making bank loans available at rates as low as minus 0.75%.  (ECB press release, March 12)
  • In her March 12 statement, Lagarde noted the ECU will “add a temporary envelope of additional net asset purchases of 120 billion euros ($135.28 billion) until the end of the year, ensuring a strong contribution from the private sector purchase programmes.”  She also stated, “We welcome the commitment of the euro area governments and the European Institutions to act now, strongly, and together in response to the repercussions of the further spread of the coronavirus.” (Video of ECU press conference, March 12)
  • After Lagarde’s announcement, the spread between German and Italian government bonds increased to more than 2.5 percent as Italy battles a widespread outbreak.
  • Today, the ECB’s chief economist Phillip Lane sought to further reassure European markets.  In a blog post, Lane wrote, “We clearly stand ready to do more and adjust all of our instruments, if needed to ensure that the elevated spreads that we see in response to the acceleration of the spreading of the coronavirus do not undermine transmission [of monetary policy].”
  • British regulators temporarily banned short selling on Italian and Spanish after regulators in Italy and Spain did the same to stem the market slide.  (Financial Conduct Authority  and Reuters, March 13)
  • Germany’s state development bank KfW announced today it will provide a massive expansion of loans to companies in need and defer billions of euros in tax payments.  Olaf Scholz, the German finance minister, told reporters in Berlin, “This is the bazooka, and we will use it to do whatever it takes.”  He added there was “no upper limit on the amount of loans KfW can issue.” (rfi and Financial Times, March 13)
  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated yesterday, “We are in a situation that is unusual in every respect and I would say more unusual than at the time of the banking crisis because we are dealing with a health problem, a health challenge for which scientists and medicine does not yet have an answer,” Merkel said. (Reuters, March 12)
  • Central banks in Australia, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Norway and Sweden also announced stimulus measures today to relieve the strain on their banking systems. 
  • In China, The People’s Bank on Friday said it will release nearly $80 billion in liquidity into its financial system to assist loans to small businesses and low-wage individuals as the country continues to contend with the coronavirus.  (Wall Street Journal, March 13)
  • The US Federal Reserve’s first emergency move on March 3 to contain the coronavirus economic fallout was to cut interest rates half a point. The move came shortly finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of 7, which includes Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan, held a conference call.

On March 5, Federal Reserve Bank of New York President John C. Williams confirmed that the international community of central bankers are working together to stem the economic shock of the coronavirus. “… policy actions by central banks are clear indications of the close alignment at the international level,” Mr. Williams said.  (NYTimes, March 5)

#  #  #

House Passes Beneficial Ownership Bill; Senate Version Faces Uncertain Future

Posted on by Trey Jackson

 

FINCEN logo

The U.S. House of Representatives on Oct. 22 passed the Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 (H.R. 2513), which would require corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) to report their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).  The bill – introduced by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Peter King (R-NY) – would shift the FinCEN reporting requirements from banks to the business community, requiring every business with fewer than 20 employees to register their beneficial owners with FinCEN.

  • A coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable sent a letter June 10 to the committee’s leadership opposing the Maloney-King bill.  “This legislation would impose burdensome, duplicative reporting burdens on approximately 4.9 million small businesses in the United States and threatens the privacy of law abiding, legitimate small business owners,” the letter states.
  • The coalition emphasized that it supports the overall goal of preventing wrongdoers from exploiting United States corporations and LLCs for criminal gain.  Yet the coalition letter detailed significant problems with H.R. 2513. (Roundtable Weekly, June 15)
  • In the Senate, the Improving Laundering Laws and Increasing Comprehensive Information Tracking of Criminal Activity in Shell Holdings (ILLICIT CASH) Act was introduced in June by Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Doug Jones (D-AL) and Mike Rounds (R-SD).  (Homeland Preparedness News, June 12)
  • Additionally, a Senate bill addressing beneficial ownership is entitled the True Incorporation Transparency for Law Enforcement (TITLE) Act (S. 1889).  A coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable on Oct. 16 sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee leaders strongly opposing the bill.  The letter states, “This legislation would impose duplicative and problematic reporting burdens on millions of small businesses in the United States and would threaten the privacy of law-abiding small business owners.”  (Policy Comment Letter, Oct. 16)
  • The Senate versions have different provisions, have not yet been the focus of a committee hearing, and prospects for a floor vote are uncertain. (BGov, Oct. 22)
  • The White House budget office commented this week that the House measure “represents important progress” but said it must be improved as it moves through the legislative process.  Among the steps recommended by the Administration are “protecting small businesses from unduly burdensome disclosure requirements, and providing for adequate access controls with respect to the information gathered under this bill’s new disclosure regime.”
  • The statement concludes, “The Administration looks forward to continuing to engage in a bipartisan fashion with the House and Senate to address these important issues.”

The Roundtable plans to work with policymakers to stake out a balanced position on the beneficial ownership issue that would inhibit illicit money laundering activity, yet not place unnecessary costs and legal burdens on the real estate industry. 

#  #  #

 

Volcker Rule Changes Finalized, Easing Banking Restrictions

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Federal Reserve Building DC

Reforms to the Volcker Rule, which aimed to restrict proprietary trading practices at banks, received final approval Oct. 8 by the Federal Reserve and four other regulatory agencies. (AP, Oct. 8)

  • The final Rule – expected to enhance liquidity to commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) markets – takes effect on January 1, 2020 with a compliance date of January 1, 2021.  (Federal Reserve, Oct. 8)
  • Under the revised Rule, firms that do not have significant trading activities will have simplified and streamlined compliance requirements, while firms with significant trading activity will have more stringent compliance requirements. Community banks generally are exempt from the Volcker rule by statute. The revisions continue to prohibit proprietary trading, while providing greater clarity and certainty for activities allowed under the law.
  • The final Rule represents the most significant revision to date of the original 2013 Volcker Rule regulations.  The Roundtable has long advocated revisions to the Volcker rule, raising concerns about how it could “negatively impact liquidity and capital formation in commercial real estate.”
  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer commented on the Volker Rule changes. “This positive action will benefit liquidity and the commercial mortgage backed securities market, potentially increasing investment in job-creating construction activities,” DeBoer said. (Roundtable Weekly, June 1, 2018)
  • The revisions are expected to make it easier for ‘banking entities’ to hold and trade CMBS and could enhance market liquidity.  Commercial banks and CMBS are two of the top sources of private debt for commercial and multifamily real estate.  

The changes were jointly developed by the Federal Reserve Board, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

# # #

Senate Committee Considers Protections for Banks Dealing With Legal Cannabis-Related Businesses; Bill Would Allow CRBs to Buy Property Insurance

Posted on by Trey Jackson

A Senate Banking Committee hearing on July 23 focused on a bipartisan bill that would protect lenders from federal liability when they provide accounts and other financial services to cannabis-related businesses (CRBs) deemed legal under state laws.  The bill would also protect certain real estate transactions involving legitimate CRBs. (Senate Banking Committee, ” Challenges for Cannabis and Banking: Outside Perspectives “)

Senate Banking Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID)  said at the hearing that “the case was made pretty strongly” that lawmakers needed to address confusion about whether banks and credit unions can provide accounts to marijuana businesses, as well as those ancillary businesses that service the growing industry.
  • The hearing featured testimony by Sens. Cory Gardner (R-CO) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), co-sponsors of the Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act.  Their bill (S. 1200) would provide a safe harbor to financial institutions serving CRBs, protecting them from federal money laundering laws. 
  • Senate Banking Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) said at the hearing that “the case was made pretty strongly” that lawmakers needed to address confusion about whether banks and credit unions can provide accounts to marijuana businesses, as well as those ancillary businesses that service the growing industry. (BGov, July 23)  Chairman Crapo reportedly “stopped short of endorsing a legal fix for banks that want to serve cannabis businesses, warning that major concerns he has about financial crimes and access to the drug still need to be addressed.” (Politico Morning Money, July 24) 
  • For real estate: the SAFE Banking Act would protect sellers and lessors of real estate, and other “service providers,” by clarifying that proceeds from transactions with legitimate CRBs do not derive from unlawful activity – and thus do not provide a predicate for federal criminal money laundering. 
  • The Real Estate Roundtable on April 30 urged the Senate Banking Committee leadership to hold hearings on the SAFE Act.  Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer stated in the letter, “Without a bank account, dispensaries and other legal CRBs must operate on a cash basis.  Risks of crime thus increase and tax revenues to pay for infrastructure and other government services are potentially lost.  S. 1200 can significantly address these problems by providing protections for banks, real estate firms and their employees from punishment simply because they aim to serve businesses within … states that have legalized marijuana to varying degrees.”  (Roundtable Policy Letter, April 30) 
  • Companion legislation in the House (H.R. 1595) was approved by the Financial Services Committee on March 27 by a 45-15 vote. A full House vote on the bill may occur after the upcoming summer recess. (Roundtable Weekly, April 26 and Forbes, July 23) 
  • At the July 23 Senate hearing, Banking Committee member Bob Menendez (D-NJ) discussed bipartisan legislation he introduced the day before – to ensure legal CRBs have access to comprehensive and affordable insurance coverage.    The Clarifying Law Around Insurance of Marijuana (CLAIM) Act would prohibit the federal government from taking any adverse action on an insurance policy held by an owner or operator of a CRB, or against real estate or equipment leased to a CRB, solely because the policy covers cannabis operations that a state deems legal. (Menendez news release, July 23) 

Following the hearing, Chairman Crapo said the Committee is acting on the SAFE Banking Act.  “We’re looking at it to see if there’s a solution to the various issues we’re talking about.”  (BGov, July 23) 

House Committee Passes Beneficial Ownership Bill; Senate Hearing on June 20

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The House Financial Services Committee this week passed the  Corporate Transparency Act of 2019  ( H.R. 2513), which would require corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) to report their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).  The bill  – introduced by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Peter King (R-NY)  – would shift the FinCEN reporting requirements from banks to the business community, requiring every business with fewer than 20 employees to register their beneficial owners with FinCEN . ( Roundtable Weekly , May 24)

The  House Financial Services Committee this week passed the Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 ( H.R. 2513 ), which would require corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) to report their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

  • H.R. 2513 would also mandate that businesses update beneficial ownership information with any changes (home or business address, driver’s license change, change in ownership) within 60 days, and annually for the life of the business.  Failure to comply with these reporting requirements would be a federal crime with civil penalties of up to $10,000 and criminal penalties of up to three years in prison.  
  • A coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable sent a letter June 10 to the committee’s leadership opposing the Maloney-King bill.  “This legislation would impose burdensome, duplicative reporting burdens on approximately 4.9 million small businesses in the United States and threatens the privacy of law abiding, legitimate small business owners,” the letter states. 
  • The coalition emphasizes that it supports the overall goal of preventing wrongdoers from exploiting United States corporations and LLCs for criminal gain.  Yet the coalition letter details significant problems with H.R. 2513. 
  • One major challenge is that the legislation would shift reporting requirements from large banks-those best equipped to handle the reporting requirements-to millions of small businesses-those least equipped to handle the reporting requirements. 
  • The coalition also notes the bill presents privacy, data breach and cybersecurity risks for millions of small businesses in the United States. 
  • On May 9, the House Financial Services Committee unanimously approved legislation entitled the “Coordinating Oversight, Upgrading and Innovating Technology, and Examiner Reform Act” or the “COUNTER Act.”  The bill (H.R. 2514) would require financial institutions to determine the beneficial owners involved in certain commercial real estate transactions – similar to a FinCEN Geographic Targeting Order requirement affecting residential purchases. (CQ, May 9 and (Roundtable Weekly, May 24) 
  • The Roundtable also raised concerns in February about beneficial ownership reporting requirements and the potential burdens they place on the real estate industry. (Coalition letter – Feb. 6, 2018).   

The Roundtable will continue to work with policymakers to stake out a balanced position on the issue that would inhibit illicit money laundering activity but does not place unnecessary costs and legal burdens on the real estate industry. 

Roundtable Urges Treasury to Clarify Tax Consequences of Transition Away from LIBOR as Reference Rate

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable yesterday asked the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS to reduce the risk of market disruption by clarifying the tax treatment of financial contracts that replace the expiring London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) with a substitute reference rate.  Over $200 trillion of LIBOR contracts are outstanding, including roughly $1.3 trillion of commercial real estate debt. (Roundtable LIBOR letter, June 6)

The Real Estate Roundtable yesterday asked the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS to reduce the risk of market disruption by clarifying the tax treatment of financial contracts that replace the expiring London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) with a substitute reference rate. (Roundtable LIBOR letter, June 6). 
  • The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates LIBOR, announced in 2017 that it is phasing out the global borrowing index by the end of 2021.  LIBOR will need to be replaced in both new agreements and innumerable existing legacy contracts.
  • Several factors may necessitate or accelerate parties’ adoption of alternative reference rates on existing contracts well before the end of 2021.  To facilitate the transition, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 2018 began publishing an alternative U.S. benchmark to work alongside LIBOR – the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).  (See: A User’s Guide to SOFR  and SOFR: A Year in Review)
  • However, several issues may be contributing to the reluctance of market participants to use SOFR, including the absence of necessary internal infrastructure to support its accounting and trading, and the lack of tax guidance. 
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer noted in the comment letter, “If the terms of a debt instrument are significantly modified, for Federal income tax purposes there is a deemed exchange of the old debt for a new (modified) debt instrument.”  Without relief, this deemed exchange could trigger the recognition of taxable gain or loss for the lender, or debt discharge income for the borrower.
  • “Moreover, the tax consequences of the deemed exchange can arise without generating actual cash to pay any ensuing tax liability,” wrote DeBoer. 

    Randal Quarles – the Fed’s vice chairman in charge of financial regulation – reiterated the urgency of moving forward on the transition to SOFR. 

  • The Roundtable’s June 6 comments recommend that a safe-harbor rule confirm that a replacement index or formula identified by regulators, broad industry groups, or similar objective sources-or by the parties themselves in good faith-is not considered an alteration or modification of the original instrument.  The Roundtable letter states, “Instead, the replacement should be treated for Federal tax purposes as a continuation of the instrument’s original terms.”
  • This week, Randal Quarles – the Fed’s vice chairman in charge of financial regulation – reiterated the urgency of moving forward on the transition to SOFR:  “I believe that the ARRC has chosen the most viable path forward and that most will benefit from following it, but regardless of how you choose to transition, beginning that transition now would be consistent with prudent risk management and the duty that you owe to your shareholders and clients …. With only two and a half years of further guaranteed stability for LIBOR, the transition should begin happening in earnest.”  (Bloomberg, June 3)
  • The Wall Street Journal reported last July that companies were adopting SOFR sparingly –  despite regulators urging banks and traders to stop launching new Libor-based contracts ahead of the 2021 deadline. (WSJ, July 12 and Roundtable Weekly, July 13, 2018) 

The Roundtable letter was developed by a task force that included Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) Chairman Frank Creamer Jr., TPAC member Don Susswein, and chair of the Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) Working Group on LIBOR, Joseph Philip Forte.  On June 11, at The Roundtable’s Annual Meeting in Washington DC, Joseph Forte will lead a RECPAC discussion on real estate’s concerns with the LIBOR transition. 

Senate Legislation Introduced to New CECL Accounting Standard Affecting Treatment of Expected Loan Losses

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Legislation introduced May 21 by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) would delay implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) accounting standard, which will force banks to book losses on bad loans much faster.  (ABA Journal, May 22)

  Legislation introduced May 21 by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) would delay implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) accounting standard, which will force banks to book losses on bad loans much faster.

  • The independent Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is proceeding with its plan to implement CECL for publicly traded U.S. banks at the beginning of 2020 – and later for other financial institutions. (Roundtable Weekly, April 5)
  • FASB  Chairman Russell Golden reiterated the organization’s commitment to implementing CECL in an interview this week with Bloomberg Tax. “We think we need to continue to work with community banks to make sure that they understand what CECL is and what it’s not,” Golden said.  (BGov, May 22)
  • The new CECL model will require certain financial institutions to estimate the expected loss over the life of a loan – a significant change to the way banks calculate reserves on assets.  The regulatory change in how banks estimate loan and lease losses (ALLL) will require substantial changes in data analytics and financial methodologies. (Wall Street Journal, April 3)  The accounting rule change was issued by the FASB in June 2016 as a result of the 2008 financial crisis.
  • For real estate, there is concern is that banks may reduce lending volumes as they build up additional capital reserves to be in compliance with CECL.  The new standard may cut into earnings and regulatory capital by forcing some banks to boost their loan-loss reserves.  (Roundtable Weekly, March 8)  
  • A business coalition that included The Real Estate Roundtable in March urged further study amid concerns that CECL may soon begin to reduce aggregate bank lending.  (Coalition Letter, March 5)

    The  Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to implement CECL.

  • Sen. Tillis’ bill (S. 1564) would require the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and bank regulators to study CECL’s effect on the availability of credit and on bank capital before the new  accounting standard takes effect.
  • Fourteen Senators – seven Democrats and seven Republicans – on May 10 sent a letter to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. requesting a delay of CECL until the regulators analyze how the new rules could impact lending.  Twenty five members of Congress on May 6 sent a letter to the SEC requesting a delay in implementation of the new FASB rule until the SEC studies it.

At a House Financial Services Committee hearing May 22, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin responded to a question about the ability of community banks to lend under  CECL.  “I share some of your concerns. This is an issue we continue to study,” Mnuchin said.  (BGov, May 22)

Senate Hearing on Beneficial Ownership Follows House Committee Action Affecting Corporate Entity Transactions

Posted on by Trey Jackson

A Senate Banking Committee hearing this week on “Combating Illicit Financing by Anonymous Shell Companies Through the Collection of Beneficial Ownership Information” followed recent approval of legislation by the House Financial Services Committee that would affect beneficial ownership requirements for commercial real estate transactions.

Senate Banking Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID)  held a hearing this week on “Combating Illicit Financing by Anonymous Shell Companies Through the Collection of Beneficial Ownership Information.”

  • Senate Banking Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) said in his opening statement that the committee seeks solutions “… to deter money laundering and the financing of terrorism through the use of front companies, shell companies, shelf companies, opaque nominees, and other means to conceal and disguise the true beneficial owners of property and other assets.”
  • The Senate committee held a previous hearing on the subject last November.  Another hearing focusing on industry perspectives is expected in June.
  • Congressional consideration of the beneficial ownership issue comes after the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) amended the Bank Secrecy Act regulations in May 2018.  FinCEN added a Customer Due Diligence rule requiring financial institutions to collect the beneficial ownership information of legal entities with which they conduct commerce. (FinCEN news release, May 2018)
  • In the House of Representatives, the Financial Services Committee considered legislation (H.R. 2514) affecting beneficial ownership during a May 8 mark-up.  (Committee Memorandum, May 3)
  • The committee approved legislation introduced by Reps. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) and Steve Stivers (R-OH) – introduced the “Coordinating Oversight, Upgrading and Innovating Technology, and Examiner Reform Act” or the “COUNTER Act” by a vote of 55-0.   The bill would require financial institutions to determine the beneficial owners involved in certain commercial real estate transactions – similar to a FinCEN Geographic Targeting Order (GTO) requirement affecting certain residential purchases. (CQ, May 9) 

    Congressional consideration of the beneficial ownership issue comes after the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) amended the Bank Secrecy Act regulations in May 2018. 
  • FinCEN’s GTO issued in November 2018 requires U.S. title insurance companies to identify the natural persons behind shell companies used in all-cash purchases of residential real estate.  The purchase amount threshold, which previously varied by city, is now set at $300,000 for each covered metropolitan area.  The GTO also covers certain counties within the following major U.S. metropolitan areas: Boston; Chicago; Dallas-Fort Worth; Honolulu; Las Vegas; Los Angeles; Miami; New York City; San Antonio; San Diego; San Francisco; and Seattle. (Wall Street Journal – Nov. 15, 2018) 
  • Another House Financials Services Committee proposal introduced by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Peter King (R-NY) was postponed during the May 8 mark-up, yet is expected to be considered in June.  Their Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 ( H.R. 2513) would shift FinCEN reporting requirements on beneficial ownership from banks to the business community.  (CQ, May 9 and May 21) 
  • The Maloney-King legislation would require every business with fewer than 20 employees to register their beneficial owners with FinCEN.  Businesses would also need to update that registration with any changes (home or business address, driver’s license change, change in ownership) within 60 days, and annually for the life of the business.  Failure to do so would result in federal criminal penalties.  However, the bill fails to address the required information and the process for compliance.

The Roundtable has raised concerns about beneficial ownership reporting requirements and the potential burdens they place on the real estate industry. (Coalition letter – Feb. 6, 2018).  The Roundtable will continue to work with policymakers to stake out a balanced position on the issue that would inhibit illicit money laundering activity but does not place unnecessary costs and legal burdens on the real estate industry.