Roundtable Urges Senate Committees to Address Federal-State Cannabis Policy Conflicts Constraining Banking, Real Estate Transactions

The Real Estate Roundtable on April 30 wrote to the Senate Banking and Judiciary Committees urging hearings to consider the SAFE Banking Act (S. 1200) and the STATES Act (S. 1028) – measures that would provide clarity for banking firms and real estate providers to fully serve the needs of cannabis-related businesses deemed legal under state law.  (Roundtable Policy Letter, April 30)

Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer states in the April 30 letter, “Passage of the SAFE Banking Act is a strong first step to clarify a full range of proper business conduct in the rapidly evolving context of cannabis policy.”

  • The bipartisan Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act is led by co-sponsors Sens. Cory Gardner (R-CO) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR).  S. 1200 clarifies that banks would not face adverse action on a loan to a real estate owner solely because that owner leases property to legitimate, state-licensed, cannabis-related businesses (CRBs).  The measure would also protect sellers and lessors of real estate and other CRB “service providers” by clarifying that proceeds from state-approved marijuana-related transactions do not derive from unlawful activity, and thus do not provide a predicate for federal criminal money laundering.
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer states in the letter, “Passage of the SAFE Banking Act is a strong first step to clarify a full range of proper business conduct in the rapidly evolving context of cannabis policy.”
  • DeBoer encouraged the committees to hold hearings on the SAFE Act to create a record for resolving and reconciling the conflict between business transactions that are deemed legal under state law, yet exposed to federal criminal liability.  If the SAFE Act is enacted, federally regulated banks would no longer face the threat of sanction simply by providing financial services to a legitimate state-authorized CRB.
  • The Roundtable letter also supports the swift enactment of the bipartisan Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States  (STATES) Act, led by Sens. Cory Gardner (R-CO) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).  S. 1028 would ensure that each state has the right to determine for itself the best approach to cannabis within its borders.  (U.S. News & World Report, April 4 and  Roundtable Weekly, April 12)  
  • In the House, the STATES Act (H.R. 2093) was reintroduced on April 4 by Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) and David Joyce (D-OH).  Additionally, the SAFE Act (H.R. 1595) – co-sponsored by Reps. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), Denny Heck (D-WA), Steve Stivers (R-OH) and Warren Davidson (R-OH) – was approved by the House Financial Services Committee on March 27 by a 45-15 vote. (Roundtable Weekly, April 26) 

Prospects for passing cannabis-related bills in the Senate remains uncertain.  Senate Banking Chairman Michael Crapo (R-ID) this week expressed doubt about the SAFE Act in Congress.  “As long as cannabis is illegal under federal law, it seems to me to be difficult for us to resolve this,” he said.  (Politico Pro, May 1)

House Committee Approves Bill Allowing Banks to Serve Legal Cannabis Businesses; Roundtable Urges Enactment

The House Financial Services Committee on March 27 approved the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act of 20119 (H.R. 1595), which would allow financial institutions to legally work with state-authorized cannabis-related businesses.

The Roundtable earlier in the week sent a  letter urging swift enactment  of the legislation to the leadership of the House Financial Services and Judiciary Committees.

  • The bipartisan bill, approved by a 45-15 vote, was co-sponsored Reps. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), Denny Heck (D-WA), Steve Stivers (R-OH) and Warren Davidson (R-OH).
  • The Real Estate Roundtable earlier in the week sent a letter urging swift enactment of the legislation to the leadership of the House Financial Services and Judiciary Committees. 
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer notes in the letter, “The SAFE Banking Act provides much-needed clarity for the banking, real estate, and business sectors to function within the contours of state laws that have legalized marijuana.”
  • The Roundtable letter emphasizes that federal and state law differences on cannabis policy leaves banks and real estate providers trapped between their mission to serve lawful businesses in local communities – and the threat of federal enforcement action.  If H.R. 1595 is enacted, federally regulated banks would no longer face the threat of sanction simply by providing financial services to a legitimate cannabis-related businesses (CRB).
  • “Without a bank account, dispensaries and other legal CRBs must operate on a cash basis,” DeBoer notes. “Risks of crime thus increase and tax revenues to pay for infrastructure and other government services are potentially lost.  H.R. 1595 can significantly address these problems by providing protections for banks, real estate firms and their employees from punishment simply because they aim to serve businesses within the 46 states that have legalized marijuana to varying degrees,” DeBoer stated.  (Roundtable SAFE Act letter, March 25)

Rep. Perlmutter noted the broad support for the legislation from the business community, including The Roundtable, in a March 28 news release. Perlmutter added, “With 152 cosponsors at the time of the committee vote – over a third of the entire House – the bill will next move to the floor of the House.  A Senate companion bill is also expected to be introduced in the coming weeks.”  

Business Coalition Urges Implementation Delay for FASBโ€™s โ€˜Current Expected Credit Loss Accounting Standardโ€™ (CECL), Pending Impact Analysis

A business coalition that includes The Real Estate Roundtable on March 5 wrote to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to urge a delay in the implementation of the proposed Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) accounting standard, which may begin to reduce aggregate bank lending as early as next year. (Coalition Letter, March 5)

The March 5 coalition letter cites a 2018 KPMB survey showing companies are struggling to make certain accounting, modeling and data decisions to be in compliance with CECL. (KPMG, Financial institutions feeling the crunch in countdown to CECL implementation)

  • The new CECL model will change the way banks calculate reserves on assets, requiring certain financial institutions to estimate the expected loss over the life of a loan beginning in January 2020.  For real estate, there is concern is that banks may reduce lending volumes as they build up additional capital reserves to be in compliance with CECL. 
  • The accounting rule change was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in June 2016 as a result of the 2008 financial crisis.
  • The regulatory change in how banks estimate losses in their allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) will require substantial changes in data analytics and financial methodologies.  The March 5 coalition letter cites a 2018 KPMB survey showing companies are struggling to make certain accounting, modeling and data decisions to be in compliance with CECL.  (KPMG, Financial institutions feeling the crunch in countdown to CECL implementation)
  • According to Trepp’s Looking at Historical CRE Losses for CECL, “To benchmark and fine-tune loss methodologies for CECL, the key for banks will be a four-letter word: data.  Unfortunately, many banks have very little in the way of granular historical data, and a number of those that do have good data have taken few to no losses in their history. This has made it difficult for those banks to effectively model future losses.”  (Trepp article by Joe McBride, April 21, 2017)
  • To avoid unintended economic consequences, the coalition states in its letter, “We believe it is important to delay implementation of CECL in order to allow for time to conduct a quantitative impact analysis and to consider potential alternatives, while allowing for post-issuance field testing. Time for further assessment will also allow regulators to better understand and address the key consequences of any proposal for capital and other regulatory purposes.”

The 8 signatories to the coalition letter are the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, The Real Estate Roundtable, Commercial Real Estate Finance Council, Mortgage Bankers Association, National Association of Realtors, Credit Union National Association and National Association of Federal Credit Unions.

Banking Regulators Invite Comments on Proposed Rule for High Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) Loans

Three federal banking agencies on Tuesday invited public comment on a proposal to modify capital rules for high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposures – as required by Sec. 214 of the bipartisan Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155).  (Roundtable Weekly, May 25)

Three federal banking agencies on Sept. 18, 2018 invited public comment on a proposal to modify capital rules for high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposures.

  • Following the enactment of S. 2155 on May 24, federal regulatory agencies were tasked with developing a rule to clarify the treatment of High Volatility Commercial Real Estate acquisition, development, or construction (HVCRE ADC) loans in accordance with the new statute. 
  • The law’s changes to the HVCRE capital rules are aimed at clarifying and promoting sustainable acquisition, development and construction and lending by addressing key deficiencies in the agencies’ prior regulations governing the criteria for HVCRE or HVADC loans. (Roundtable HVCRE Comment Letter, March 2) 
  • The proposal by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also asks for comment on certain terms contained in the revised definition of high volatility commercial real estate.
  • The changes, when finalized, would apply to all banking organizations subject to the agencies’ capital rules. Comments will be accepted for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.  

Since 2015, The Roundtable’s HVCRE Working Group and industry coalition partners have played a key role in advancing specific reforms to the HVCRE Rule and will develop a comment letter to the agencies in response to the current proposal.

 

Top Republican Unveils Bipartisan Housing Finance Reform Bill

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) on Sept. 6 unveiled a sweeping proposal to overhaul the housing finance system in the United States during a hearing entitled, “A Failure to Act: How a Decade without GSE Reform Has Once Again Put Taxpayers at Risk.”

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) on Sept. 6 unveiled a sweeping proposal to overhaul the housing finance system in the United States during a hearing entitled, “A Failure to Act: How a Decade without GSE Reform Has Once Again Put Taxpayers at Risk.” 

(Hensarling statement on YouTube). 

  • This fall marks ten years since the height of the financial crisis, when the Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into government conservatorship on September 6, 2008.  According to a committee summary of yesterday’s  hearing, “The subsequent financial bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has required over $190 billion in taxpayers contributions to date, and taxpayers remain explicitly obliged to provide over $254 billion should future losses materialize.  Never intended as a permanent solution, the conservatorship continues ten years later.” 
  • The discussion draft of the “Bipartisan Housing Finance Reform Act of 2018” proposes to “repeal the GSEs’ charters, permanently ending their monopoly, and transition to a system that allows qualified mortgages backed by an approved private credit enhancer with regulated, diversified capital resources to access the explicit, full government securitization guarantee provided by Ginnie Mae,” according to Chairman Hensarling’s opening committee statement.  The bill is co-sponsored by Jim Hines (D-CT) and John Delaney (D-MD). 
  • In a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, Hensarling further explained the proposal – “Loan originators would have to acquire coverage from an approved ‘credit enhancer,’ or private mortgage credit guarantor, to use the Ginnie Mae system. That would function as a private capital buffer on the loan, which could then be securitized by any of Ginnie Mae’s more than 400 approved issuers with an explicit, full government guarantee of mortgage-backed securities.” (Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, Sept. 6) 
  • The day before the hearing, a coalition of the housing industry’s largest trade groups and affordable housing advocates wrote to the Trump Administration and Congress to enact permanent reforms to the government-sponsored enterprises.  ( Coalition letter and HousingWire, Sept 5) 
  • A private sector solution to GSE reform was offered in a Sept. 4 Op-Ed in The Hill by Roundtable member Willy Walker, Chairman and CEO of Walker & Dunlop, one of the largest commercial real estate finance companies in the United States.
  • In his Op-Ed, Mr. Walker writes, “The GSEs’ multifamily lending businesses, where they back loans to owners of apartment buildings across the country, is the model that should be applied to all lending done by the GSEs. It’s the same role they play in financing single-family homes, but with a fundamental difference: In the multifamily business, private capital is required to take risk on every loan the GSEs guarantee, protecting the GSEs and taxpayers in the process.” (A fix for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac already exists, Sept. 4) 
  • The proposed legislation has slim chances of advancing during an election year, yet Reps. Hensarling and Delaney said it could serve as a road map that lawmakers in the next Congress could use to push for GSE reform.  Hensarling is not running for re-election. (Bloomberg, Sept 6) 

Hensarling concluded his committee statement, “If the political will to enact such reform stalls in this Congress or the next, the Administration can and should effectuate change. The President will appoint a new Federal Housing Finance Agency Director in January. With apologies to The Rolling Stones, ‘you can’t always get what you want, but if you try some time, you just might find, you get what you need’ to avert the next housing crisis.”  (Hensarling statement on YouTube)

 

House Follows Senate in Passing Bills Addressing Foreign Investment Risk; Includes Language Affecting Real Estate

The House of Representatives on June 26 voted 400-2 to pass legislation (H.R. 5841) that overhauls federal review of transactions involving foreign companies or countries, including certain real estate transactions. The Senate on June 18 passed its version of the legislation (S. 2098).  (Dechert, June 2018) 

Both the House and Senate FIRRMA bills would expand the list of covered transactions to include some foreign purchases and leases of real estate near military and other strategic facilities.

  • The bills would update the review authority of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) to review national security implications of transactions that could result in control of a U.S. business by a foreign person – and to block transactions or impose measures to mitigate any threats to U.S. security.
  • Both the House and Senate bills would expand the list of covered transactions to include some foreign purchases and leases of real estate near military and other strategic facilities.  Responding to concerns raised by The Roundtable and other industry groups, each bill includes similar language designed to exempt real estate located in ‘urbanized areas’ from the criteria of a covered transaction.  [See Title II, Sec. 201in the House’s Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRMMA) and for S. 2098, see  pages 7 through 9].  The Census defines an urbanized area as one comprising more than 50,000 people.

While the House and Senate bills are similar, the definition of “critical technology” differs and will require reconciliation before a final vote in each chamber. The Trump Administration has shown support for reforming FIRRMA to strengthen CFIUS’ oversight.

Five Regulatory Agencies Clear Path for Volcker Rule Changes

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this week became the fifth and final regulatory agency to advance possible reforms to the Volcker Rule, which aims to restrict proprietary trading practices at banks. The Federal Reserve became the first agency to move a proposal to simplify and ease the Volcker Rule forward last week, followed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.  If adopted, this proposed revision is expected to enhance liquidity to commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) markets.  (Roundtable Weekly, June 1)

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton

  • SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said, “The proposal seeks to simplify and tailor the 2013 final rule. I strongly encourage all interested parties to comment on the many questions proposed in the release and I look forward to commentator input about implementing the Volcker Rule in a more effective way.”
  • In a memorandum to the Fed’s Board of Governors, Fed Vice Chairman for Supervision Randall Quarles details the changes in the proposal.
  • U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on June 5 commended the efforts of the Agencies.  Mnuchin stated, “The Treasury Department strongly supports changes aimed at better tailoring the application of the rule, preserving liquidity during periods of stress, decreasing unintended compliance burdens, and encouraging capital formation.  The five agencies responsible for regulation of the Volcker Rule coming together on this notice is an important first step. These efforts are building on the relief for Main Street borrowers and lenders included in the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act recently signed into law by President Trump.”
  • In a January 2012 comment letter to the Federal Reserve and other financial regulatory agencies, The Roundtable raised concerns about the unintended consequences of the Volcker Rule that could “negatively impact liquidity and capital formation in commercial real estate.”

The Volcker rule reform proposal will be a topic of discussion at next week’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) held in conjunction with The Roundtable’s Annual Meeting in Washington. The Roundtable plans to submit comments to the Agencies before a final rule is expected to be in effect by January 1, 2019.

The Fed and FCIC Vote to Simplify and Ease Volcker Rule

A proposal to simplify and ease the Volcker Rule, which restricts proprietary trading practices at banks and is enforced by five separate federal agencies, was unanimously approved this week by both the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC). (Roundtable Weekly, May 25)

The Fed’s proposal is part of a broader regulatory rollback.  (“ The Volcker Rule’s Proposed Revision Could Add Liquidity To CMBS ” – GlobeSt, May 31)

  • The nearly 400-page proposal, known as Volcker 2.0, would seek to simplify regulatory requirements by giving banks new quantitative “bright-line rules” to provide more clarity on what activities are prohibited and permitted. The Fed proposal is part of a broader regulatory rollback, which includes the recently enacted Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155) that included Roundtable-supported revisions to the Basel III High Volatility Commerical Real Estate (HVCRE) Rule. 
  • For CRE, the Volcker Rule has put a damper on secondary market trading of commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS) by limiting the ability of banks to hold inventories of secondary market securities, thereby diminishing market liquidity.  In addition to restricting banks from buying certain securities for their own accounts (so-called proprietary trading), it also has prohibited them from investing in hedge or private-equity funds – including real estate.  (“ The Volcker Rule’s Proposed Revision Could Add Liquidity To CMBS ”  – GlobeSt , May 31)
  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer commented on the Volker Rule proposal. “This positive action will benefit liquidity and the commercial mortgage backed securities market, potentially increasing investment in job-creating construction activities,” DeBoer said.
  • One of the most significant changes in the Volcker 2.0 proposal would give banks more latitude by making it easier for them to show they are trading to help clients — a permitted activity known as market making  — rather than proprietary trading .
  • In a memorandum to the Fed’s Board of Governors, Fed Vice Chairman for Supervision Randall Quarles details the changes in the proposal .
  • In a January 2012 comment letter  to the Federal Reserve and other financial regulatory agencies, the Roundtable raised concerns about the unintended consequences of the Volcker Rule that could “negatively impact liquidity and capital formation in commercial real estate.”

The Fed and its regulatory partners are seeking public comment on its Volcker rule reform proposals. The Roundtable plans to work with its Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) to submit comments before a final rule is expected to be in effect by January 1, 2019.

Senate and House Committees Approve Bills Addressing Foreign Investment Risk; Includes Language Affecting Real Estate

Separate bills that would overhaul the process for reviewing foreign investment risk – including a purchase or lease by a foreign party of domestic properties located close to sensitive U.S. facilities – received unanimous approval Wednesday by the Senate Banking and House Financial Services Committees.  (Lexology, May 23)

Real estate provisions in  S. 2098  appear on pages 7 through 9.

  • The committees’ revised versions of the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA) – S. 2098 and HR 5841 – seek to modernize and strengthen how the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) reviews acquisitions, mergers, and other foreign investments in the United States for national security risks.  Both bills would expand the list of covered transactions to include some foreign purchases and leases of real estate near military and other strategic facilities. (Real estate provisions in S. 2098 appear on pages 7 through 9.)
  • As a result of industry discussions with Senate and Treasury staff, the new legislative drafts include the addition of language designed to exempt real estate in ‘urbanized areas’ from the criteria of a covered transaction.  The Census defines an urbanized area as one comprising more than 50,000 people. 

FIRRMA may be ready for floor consideration in the House and Senate before the August congressional recess. The Trump Administration has shown support for reforming FIRRMA to strengthen CFIUS’ oversight. 

President Trump Signs Dodd-Frank Reform Bill With HVCRE Revisions

Revisions to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act – including significant Roundtable-supported reforms to the Basel III High Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) Rule – were signed into law by President Trump yesterday, two days after the House passed The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155). 

Revisions to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act – including significant Roundtable-supported reforms to the Basel III High Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) Rule – were signed into law by President Trump yesterday, two days after the House passed The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155).

  • S. 2155 previously passed the Senate in March with the same clarifications and reforms as the House bill.  The HVCRE Rule created needless confusion and increased borrowing costs in the industry for CRE Acquisition, Development and Construction (ADC) lending.
  • Senate Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) commented, “This step toward right-sizing regulation will allow local banks and credit unions to focus more on lending, in turn propelling economic growth and creating jobs on Main Street and in our communities.” (Sen. Mike Crapo News Release, May 22)
  • Details of the new measure addresses key deficiencies in current and proposed regulations.  Real Estate Roundtable HVCRE Working Group Co-Chair Joseph Forte (Sullivan and Worcester) noted, “This legislative action is a welcome solution to a poorly designed regulatory capital scheme that has not matched with risk. This caused an unnecessary cost burden to all commercial banks and their real estate development customers.  In addition, it restores to borrowers the ability to offer appreciated land value as equity to banks, when validated through appraisal practices established in earlier statutes.”  (Passage of Dodd-Frank Reform Encourages Investment, Economic Growth in Local Communities –Roundtable News Release, May 22) 
  • The Roundtable and twelve other real estate organizations detailed the industry’s HVCRE policy positions and urged inclusion of the language in broader Dodd-Frank reform legislation (S. 2155). (Roundtable HVCRE Comment Letter, March 2)
  • “The Reform Bill, in provisions that are now effective, overrides certain highly conservative provisions in both the federal banking agencies’ (Banking Agencies) Basel III capital rule and their interpretations of it.” ( Dodd Frank 2.0: Reforming U.S. HVCRE Capital Treatment, Gibson Dunn, May 24)

Since 2015, The Roundtable’s HVCRE Working Group and industry coalition partners have played a key role in advancing specific reforms to the HVCRE Rule.  During next month’s Real Estate Roundtable Annual Meeting, HVCRE will be a focus of discussion, with more specific details offered during the Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) meeting on June 14.