Category: Housing

Coalition Statement on House Passage of the Amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

11 National Organizations Commend the House for its Work, Now Call on Senate to Swiftly Pass the Act

The undersigned housing groups representing thousands of housing providers and tens of millions of residents commend the House of Representatives for its bipartisan passage of the recently amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.

The revised Act, like all compromise legislation, is not perfect. Nevertheless, it is one that our organizations support as it encompasses some of the most significant housing proposals in a generation.
As the process moves forward, it will be vital that the final language safeguards millions of BTR homes and the individuals and families that are building their lives in them.

The Act includes many meaningful reforms that will help modernize federal housing programs, reduce barriers to development, and encourage the production and preservation of more housing nationwide. This revised legislation will help communities expand housing supply, improve affordability, and create more pathways to both rental housing and homeownership.

In the days to come, we look forward to working with lawmakers and the Department of the Treasury to finalize important aspects of the bill around implementation and interpretation and make sure that BTR housing can continue to play such a robust and vital role in providing the rental housing the nation needs.

Now, as the President has indicated that he will sign the revised Act, this Coalition urges the Senate to pass this major legislation.

The amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act is a key win for members of Congress, the Administration and, most importantly, the American people.

Download Statement

  • Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition
  • Leading Builders of America
  • MBA
  • NAA
  • NAHB
  • NAHMA
  • Nareit
  • NHC
  • NLHA
  • NMHC
  • RER

# # #

The Real Estate Roundtable Supports Bipartisan House Amendment to 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) —Jeffrey D. DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable (RER), issued the following statement:

“We strongly support the House’s bipartisan amendment to the 21st Century Road to Housing Act scheduled for House floor consideration today.

Significantly, this bill eliminates the unconstitutional “forced sale” of build-to-rent housing that plagued prior versions.

Moreover, the latest amendment is focused where it should be — on increasing housing supply. Its sections to boost manufactured housing; help support renters interested in home ownership; build more homes in Opportunity Zones; streamline excessive environmental reviews that delay residential construction; encourage transit-oriented development; and promote much-needed land-use and zoning reforms, among other provisions, all add up to a comprehensive and robust package of smart housing policy.

We congratulate Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill and Ranking Member Waters on their landmark bipartisan accomplishment. Congress should pass the measure without delay so more homes that are safe, modern, and affordable can be delivered for the American people.”

#     #     #

House Releases Revised Housing Package Focused on Supply and Affordability

Posted on by abigail_grenadier
U.S. Capitol building

House leaders this week released amended text of the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, preserving major pro-housing provisions aimed at increasing supply, improving affordability, and expanding housing options across the country. The revised package is expected to receive a House vote next week, before returning to the Senate for final approval. (Politico | Bisnow | The Hill, May 14)

State of Play

  • House Republican leaders continued reworking the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act this week, even as President Donald Trump publicly urged Congress to pass the Senate bill as written. (Politico, May 11)
  • Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said Friday that he still intends for the House to vote on changes to the Senate’s housing package, despite opposition from White House officials and Senate Republicans. “We’re focused on producing a housing bill that meets all the objectives,” Speaker Johnson said. “It’ll be bipartisan, bicameral.” (Politico, May 15)
  • House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill (R-AR) and Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) released the House’s amended text Thursday, with leadership aiming to bring the bill to the floor next week. (The Hill, May 14)
  • Rep. Hill said the bipartisan amendment reflects concerns raised by members and stakeholders, adding that it “cuts unnecessary barriers to new home construction, modernizes Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs, and allows banks to more freely deploy funding into their communities.” (Rep. Hill Statement, May 14)

  • Speaking to reporters Friday, Rep. Hill said the House bill addresses legal concerns raised by the Senate’s investor restriction language, including its forced-sale requirement for certain build-to-rent homes. “It’s in the bill in the right way. I think it removes some of the legal challenges that we felt that were in the structure of the Senate bill. We think this has made a better bill.” (Politico, May 15)

  • Rep. Waters said the updated bill “restores key provisions to hold institutional investors accountable and protect renters, while expanding access to affordable housing opportunities for families across the country.”  (Rep. Waters Statement, May 15)
  • In a statement following the release, RER said the amended bill makes significant improvements by removing the forced-disposition requirement that would have raised serious constitutional concerns, chilled investment in new rental housing, prevented the construction of thousands of homes, and worsened supply constraints in markets across the country. (RER Statement, May 14)

  • Progressive and conservative groups alike have cited numerous benefits that single-family rental (SFR) owners and builders deliver to U.S. housing markets, including increasing supply, maintaining and improving homes, and providing opportunities for families to live in communities with strong education systems where homeownership may be out of reach. (Progressive Policy Institute | Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 2026) (Roundtable Weekly, April 17 | April 10)

Key House Revisions

  • The package includes broad housing supply and affordability reforms to reduce barriers to new construction, support manufactured housing innovation, streamline environmental reviews, and modernize HUD programs.
  • The updated House text removes the Senate bill’s forced-disposition requirement for build-to-rent housing, while retaining restrictions and enforcement provisions related to future single-family home acquisitions by large institutional investors. (The Hill, May 14)
  • Additionally, it would create grant programs for converting abandoned buildings into housing, expand community lending, and strengthen tools to encourage local zoning and pro-housing policies.

Roundtable Advocacy

  • RER and broad housing coalitions have consistently emphasized that housing affordability is driven by supply shortages, construction costs, and mortgage rates—not institutional ownership levels—and that restricting institutional capital would only make it harder to meet the nation’s growing housing needs. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16 |  Jan. 23 | Feb. 27| March 6 | March 13 | March 20 | March 27 | April 3 | April 10 | April 17 | April 24 | May 1 | May 8)
  • Following the release of the amended text, RER and a broad housing coalition urged Congress to pass the bill quickly, calling it a major opportunity to expand supply, improve affordability, and broaden housing choice. (Coalition Letter | Coalition Statement | May 14)
  • The housing crisis cannot be solved without building more affordable homes of every type, in every market and for every stage of life — including rental housing, workforce housing and paths to homeownership,” said RER President & CEO Jeffrey DeBoer. “Restricting capital will only make that shortage worse. Increasing supply is the path forward.” (RER Statement | May 14)

HUD Raises Concerns

  • HUD Secretary Scott Turner wrote to congressional leaders Friday to remove parts of the House-amended bill related to institutional investor restrictions and a new tenant hotline, warning they could create significant operational challenges for HUD and expand the department’s role in state and local housing matters. (PoliticoPro, May 15)
  • Sec. Turner also testified before House and Senate appropriators this week on the administration’s fiscal 2027 HUD budget request, emphasizing the need to reduce regulatory barriers, streamline permitting, and lower housing production costs. (Politico, May 12)
  • Sec. Turner cited local zoning restrictions, environmental reviews, and federal regulations as major drivers of housing costs, while lawmakers in both parties raised concerns about proposed HUD funding cuts. (House Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing, May 12)
  • Lawmakers also highlighted Opportunity Zones (OZs) and public-private partnerships as housing production tools. Sec. Turner defended OZs as “very transformative,” saying public-private partnerships are “crucial and key” to increasing affordable housing supply and revitalizing communities. (Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing, May 14)

RER and its coalition partners appreciate the bipartisan work of House and Senate leaders and urge swift passage of the housing bill to expand access to homeownership and rental housing opportunities nationwide.

Housing Coalition Strongly Supports Amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

11 National Organizations Send Letter to Congressional Leadership Calling for Swift Passage of Revised Legislation

Today, the undersigned organizations representing the nation’s rental housing providers and tens of millions of residents sent a letter to Congressional leadership signaling their strong support for the revised 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.

Crucially, the revised bill preserves Build-to-Rent (BTR) housing, thereby safeguarding the development of hundreds of thousands of rental homes and benefiting the individuals and families who are building their lives in those homes. Professional housing providers and the sources of capital that support them are an important resource for Americans who need more housing options. This legislation will help preserve flexible housing options for renters, ease affordability challenges and provide more opportunity for households on the path toward homeownership.

Housing affordability has never been as critical an issue for American voters, and we stand ready to work with policymakers to ensure the final bill advances the goal of lowering costs while providing greater housing choice in communities across the nation.

We thank both the House and the Senate for their leadership on this issue and now call on Congress to pass this bipartisan bill quickly and deliver it to the President for his signature.

Signatories Include:
Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition
Leading Builders of America
Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA)
National Apartment Association (NAA)
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)
National Housing Conference (NHC)
National Leased Housing Association (NLHA)
National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC)
National Rental Home Council (NRHC)
Nareit
Real Estate Roundtable (RER)

The Real Estate Roundtable Supports Amended Bipartisan Housing Package to Increase Supply and Improve Affordability

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) — The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) commends House leaders for amending the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to advance a stronger bipartisan housing package that improves affordability, removes regulatory barriers, and preserves the capital investment needed to build more homes.

The revised bill makes significant improvements to provisions affecting build-to-rent housing and institutional investment in the single-family market, including removing a forced-disposition requirement that would have raised serious constitutional concerns, chilled investment in new rental housing, prevented the construction of thousands of homes, and worsened supply constraints in markets across the country.

“The housing crisis cannot be solved without building more affordable homes of every type, in every market and for every stage of life — including rental housing, workforce housing and paths to homeownership,” said Jeffrey D. DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable. “For more than a decade, the nation’s housing supply has failed to keep pace with demand. Restricting capital will only make that shortage worse. Increasing supply is the path forward.”

The package also includes broad housing supply and affordability reforms to reduce barriers to new construction, support manufactured housing innovation, streamline environmental reviews, and modernize HUD programs. It would also create grant programs for converting abandoned buildings into housing, expand community lending and strengthen tools to encourage local zoning and pro-housing policies.

RER appreciates the bipartisan work of House and Senate leaders and urges swift passage of this landmark housing bill to expand access to homeownership and rental housing opportunities nationwide.

Housing Supply Efforts Continue as ROAD Act Path Remains Uncertain

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The path forward for the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act remains uncertain as House Republican leaders, the White House, and key committee leaders continue working through possible changes to the Senate-passed housing package. (Punchbowl News, May 8)

State of Play

  • This week, House Financial Services Committee leadership continued efforts to find a path forward on a House-amended version of the Senate-passed housing bill, but a floor vote soon after lawmakers return from recess next week now appears unlikely. (PoliticoPro, May 6 | Politico, May 4)
  • House leaders are still working through legislative language and seeking White House support before moving forward. They have made clear the Senate bill cannot pass the House as written. (PoliticoPro, May 6)
  • Section 901 remains at the center of the debate, which would limit the role of large investors in the single-family housing market and impose a seven-year forced-sale requirement on certain build-to-rent homes. (Punchbowl News, May 8)
  • President Trump privately raised concerns with the Senate-passed bill, despite earlier White House support for the package, and was reportedly close to publicly objecting to the Section 901 language late last week. (Politico, May 4)
  • The developments follow President Trump’s recent comments to Rep. Zach Nunn (R-IA), a member of the House Financial Services Committee, that he wants the legislation moving forward. (Roundtable Weekly, May 1)
  • Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said last week that the Senate housing bill is “stuck” and will likely require direct White House involvement to resolve the standoff with House GOP leadership. (Politico, May 4)

RER Advocacy

  • RER and broad housing coalitions have consistently emphasized that housing affordability is driven by supply shortages, construction costs, and mortgage rates—not institutional ownership levels—and that restricting institutional capital would only make it harder to meet the nation’s growing housing needs. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16 |  Jan. 23 | Feb. 27| March 6 | March 13 | March 20 | March 27 | April 3 | April 10 | April 17 | April 24 | May 1)
  • Last week, RER and a broad housing coalition urged Congress to fix the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act by removing language that would undermine build-to-rent housing construction and weaken the bill’s goal of expanding housing supply. (Letter, April 30)
  • The groups called on Congress to remove Section 901, pass a pro-supply housing package, and allow BTR developers and workers to get back to building the new rental homes the country urgently needs. (Roundtable Weekly, May 1)

HUD Eases Reviews

  • HUD announced this week that it is revising environmental review requirements in the FHA Multifamily Accelerated Processing (MAP) Guide, eliminating outdated provisions that HUD said have added costs, delays, and complexity for lenders and developers seeking FHA-insured multifamily financing. (HUD Press Release, May 4)
  • The updates are intended to reduce development costs, eliminate operational inefficiencies, and streamline requirements. (AHF, May 5)
  • HUD Secretary Scott Turner said the changes are aimed at “fixing policies that have made housing expensive and difficult to build,” adding that HUD is cutting outdated requirements, reducing costs and delays, and putting FHA financing back to work to support housing production and affordability.  (HUD Press Release, May 4)

Workforce Housing Legislation

  • The proposal is estimated to finance approximately 344,000 affordable rental homes and would allow state housing finance agencies to allocate credits through a competitive process similar to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). (Novograd, May 6)
  • The bill would also give states flexibility to transfer middle-income housing allocations to LIHTC and allow projects to combine both credits, helping make more mixed-income and affordable housing developments financially feasible.

RER and its coalition partners continue to urge Congress to advance a pro-supply housing package that expands production, preserves capital formation, and avoids policies that would make new rental homes harder to finance and build.

Housing Coalition Urges Congress to Fix BTR Provision in Senate Bill

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) and a broad housing coalition continue to urge members of Congress to fix the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act by removing language that would undermine build-to-rent (BTR) housing construction and weaken the bill’s goal of expanding housing supply. (Letter, April 30)

Coalition Letter

  • The coalition warned that despite repeated concerns from academics, economists, and rental housing leaders, Section 901 of the Senate bill includes language that would decimate BTR construction and communities at a time when the country needs more housing options—not fewer.
  • The letter states that the unconstitutional seven-year disposition requirement would effectively shut down new BTR development, unnecessarily scope in existing rental communities—including LIHTC properties—and increase housing costs for Americans. (Roundtable Weekly, April 17 | RER White Paper)
  • The groups called on Congress to remove Section 901, pass a pro-supply housing package, and allow BTR developers and workers to get back to building the new rental homes the country urgently needs. (Letter, April 30)

State of Play

  • President Trump wants to see progress on stalled housing legislation, according to Rep. Zach Nunn (R-IA), a member of the House Financial Services Committee, who spoke with the president at a White House event this week. “He wants the legislation moving forward,” Nunn said. (PoliticoPro, April 30)
  • After weeks of limited public engagement on the stalled housing bill, the White House is calling for more congressional action. Spokesperson Davis Ingle said President Trump “calls on Congress to pass further legislation” building on recent executive orders aimed at housing affordability. (PoliticoPro, April 30)
  • The House passed its housing package in February, followed by Senate passage of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act in March. Senate Banking leaders have urged the House to take up the Senate bill, while House Financial Services Committee leaders French Hill (R-AR) and Maxine Waters (D-CA) continue working on revisions.
  • A bipartisan House proposal could come to the floor as early as May, as lawmakers continue negotiating concerns over the Senate bill’s institutional investor restrictions and seven-year forced-sale requirement.

Market Impact

  • Recent reporting cited by the coalition letter shows the Senate language is already chilling BTR development, financing, and construction activity in markets across the country—despite the bill not yet being law. (CATO, April 29)
  • The Wall Street Journal reported that at least $3.4 billion in BTR investment, representing approximately 10,000 housing units, has already been frozen. (WSJ, April 27)
  • The Business Journals reported that capital is “on the sidelines” as investors wait for Congress to resolve the issue, with Adrianne Todman, former acting HUD secretary and current CEO of the National Rental Home Council, warning that the bill has already created a “chilling effect.” (The Business Journals, April 27)

Roundtable & Industry Advocacy

  • RER and broad housing coalitions have consistently emphasized that housing affordability is driven by supply shortages, construction costs, and mortgage rates—not institutional ownership levels—and that restricting institutional capital would only make it harder to meet the nation’s growing housing needs. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16 |  Jan. 23 | Feb. 27| March 6 | March 13 | March 20 | March 27 | April 3 | April 10 | April 17 | April 24)
  • Last month, RER shared with members of Congress a white paper by Paul Clement of Clement & Murphy, PLLC, arguing that Section 901’s forced-sale requirement raises serious constitutional concerns under the Takings Clause, and also raises equal protection and federalism concerns. (Roundtable Weekly, April 17)

Workforce Training Legislation

  • USen. Todd Young (R-IN) and U.S. Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) introduced the Workforce Apprenticeship Growth and Education Support (WAGES) Act this week, legislation aimed at strengthening career pathways into the trades and helping address persistent construction labor shortages. (Press Release, April 30)
  • The bill would create a refundable payroll tax credit for employers that maintain or participate in a Registered Apprenticeship Program (RAP), helping offset wages paid to apprentices and mentors, as well as other program costs. (Bill Summary | Text)
  • “The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) commends Senator Young and Representative Moran for introducing the Workforce Apprenticeship Growth and Education Support Act,” said Jeffrey D. DeBoer, President and CEO, RER. “By promoting apprenticeships nationwide, this bill would help address today’s shortage of well-paid, highly skilled construction and job site workers. A greater career workforce educated on the innovations rapidly occurring in construction technology and practices would significantly increase productivity, help build modern housing, meet evolving business needs, and grow the economy.” (Statements of support, April 30)
  • At RER’s Spring Roundtable Meeting last week, policymakers and industry leaders emphasized the need to strengthen the workforce pipeline—an essential part of building more housing, increasing productivity, and preparing the next generation for good-paying jobs. (Roundtable Weekly, April 24)

RER will continue working with policymakers and housing coalitions to ensure the final housing package expands supply, supports construction, strengthens the workforce, and avoids provisions that would reduce rental housing production at a time of severe national housing need.

Bipartisan House Coalition Presses Leadership to Remove Section 901

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

A bipartisan group of 76 House lawmakers urged congressional leaders to remove or revise Section 901 of the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, arguing that the provision would undermine the bill’s affordability goals by discouraging build-to-rent (BTR) housing and reducing rental options for American families. (Punchbowl News, | PoliticoPro, April 22)

Why It Matters

  • The push adds to growing House resistance as negotiators weigh how to reconcile the two chambers’ housing packages.
  • The letter, led by members of the Congressional Real Estate Caucus and Build America Caucus, warns that Section 901 “would have far-reaching and unintended consequences that run counter to the bill’s stated goal of expanding housing opportunity,” and that the provision goes “far beyond its intended purpose” by threatening to reduce rental options. (Letter | PoliticoPro April 22)
  • Lawmakers argue the provision’s broad definition would also capture the construction of new single-family rental communities—threatening a growing source of housing supply at a time when the nation remains millions of units short. (Letter | Punchbowl News, April 22)
  • Section 901 would require certain large institutional investors to sell newly built single-family rental homes after seven years—a change that could disrupt the long-term ownership model behind BTR communities, constrain capital, and reduce housing options for families seeking the flexibility of a single-family rental home.
  • The housing bill was a major focus at The Real Estate Roundtable’s (RER) Spring Roundtable Meeting this week, where members and policymaker guests discussed the growing pushback to Section 901 and the need for any final package to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions. (See story above)

State of Play

  • Since the Senate passed its version of the bill, progressive and conservative groups alike have cited numerous benefits that single-family rental owners and builders deliver for U.S. housing markets, including expanding supply, maintaining housing stock, and providing families the opportunity to live in communities where homeownership remains out of reach. (Progressive Policy Institute, February 2026 | Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 2026)
  • Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Scott Turner recently toured a build-to-rent (BTR) community with the project’s developer, operator, and industry representatives, underscoring the growing visibility of BTR. (The Real Deal, April 18 | NMHC, April 13)

RER & Industry Advocacy

  • RER and other housing advocates continue to urge lawmakers to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions while removing language that could reduce rental housing production and discourage new investment.
  • RER and broad housing coalitions have consistently emphasized that housing affordability is driven by supply shortages, construction costs, and mortgage rates—not institutional ownership levels—and that restricting institutional capital would only make it harder to meet the nation’s growing housing needs. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16 |  Jan. 23 | Feb. 27| March 6 | March 13 | March 20 | March 27 | April 3 | April 10 | April 17)
  • Last week, RER shared with members of Congress a recent white paper by Paul Clement of Clement & Murphy, PLLC, arguing that Section 901’s forced-sale requirement raises serious constitutional concerns under the Takings Clause, and also raises equal protection and federalism concerns. (Roundtable Weekly, April 17)

As lawmakers work to address the housing shortage, the focus should remain on expanding supply and lowering barriers to development—not on punitive restrictions that threaten new investment, undermine build-to-rent housing, and worsen affordability challenges.

RER White Paper Raises Constitutional Concerns With Senate Housing Bill’s Section 901

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) this week released a white paper authored by Paul Clement of Clement & Murphy, PLLC, adding significant constitutional concerns to the growing case against Section 901 of Title IX of the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (H.R. 6644). While the broader legislation contains several constructive provisions to help boost housing supply, the Senate bill’s restrictions on certain institutional investors would undermine new development, disrupt the build-to-rent (BTR) market, and raise serious legal questions. (White Paper, April 14)

Why It Matters

  • The Senate provision would apply to corporate entities that own more than 350 single-family homes. It would largely prohibit those entities from purchasing additional single-family homes and require them to sell newly constructed single-family rentals (SFR) after seven years.
  • The investor “purchase ban” on single-family homes and the “forced sale” of new single-family rentals would amount to an unprecedented federal intervention in housing markets at a time when the country needs policies that encourage development—not deter it.

What the White Paper Says

  • The white paper released by RER argues that the forced-sale requirement for build-to-rent housing raises serious constitutional problems under the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause. (White Paper, April 14)
  • The paper concludes government cannot force one private owner to sell its homes to another without trampling on the Constitution’s “public-use” and “just-compensation” requirements. Furthermore, the Senate’s bill provides no mechanism for the government to pay just compensation to investors whose homes would be taken.
  • The paper also raises equal protection concerns by singling out a narrow category of corporate owners for special burdens.
  • While Congress has broad authority to regulate economic activity, the paper notes that it cannot arbitrarily target a specific class of property owners—particularly where the ownership and disposition of private property are at stake.
  • In addition, the paper argues that the proposal departs from the traditional state and local roles in land use and housing policy, raising broader federalism concerns.

Roundtable Advocacy

  • RER has consistently supported policies that expand housing availability, reduce barriers to development, and improve affordability.
  • At the same time, RER has warned that Section 901 would do the opposite by discouraging new investment in housing and weakening a growing source of supply.
  • RER shared the white paper with members of Congress in a letter urging lawmakers to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions while removing Title IX.
  • Since the Senate passed its version of the bill, progressive and conservative groups alike have cited numerous benefits that SFR owners and builders deliver for U.S. housing markets, in terms of increasing supply, maintenance, and upkeep of units, and providing opportunities for families to live in communities with strong education systems, where they can’t afford to buy. (Progressive Policy Institute, February 2026; Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 2026)

  •  As lawmakers work to address the housing shortage, the focus should remain on expanding supply and lowering barriers to development—not on punitive restrictions that threaten new investment, weaken build-to-rent housing, and make affordability challenges worse.

The constitutional concerns surrounding Section 901, and the broader policy debate over how best to expand housing supply, will be part of the discussion at RER’s Spring Roundtable Meeting (Roundtable-level members only) next week in Washington.

White House Economic Report Underscores Supply Gap as ROAD to Housing Act Stalls

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

Congress returned to Washington this week after a two-week recess with little visible movement on the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, even as House Financial Services Committee staff continued work on a bipartisan response to the Senate-passed bill.

State of Play

  • House and Senate lawmakers remain at odds over how to reconcile the competing housing packages, with the Senate bill’s treatment of institutional investment in single-family housing still one of the biggest sticking points. (Politico, April 14)
  • RER and other housing advocates continue to press lawmakers to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions while removing language that could reduce rental housing production and discourage new investment.

Why It Matters

  • The report says that if single-family homebuilding had continued at its historical pace after 2008, the U.S. would have “10 million or more additional single-family homes today”—a striking measure of the nation’s housing shortfall and the scale of lost supply. (CRE Daily, April 14)
  • White House economists reached that figure by asking how many homes would exist today if construction had continued at its pre-2008 pace, making the estimate as much about lost capacity as current demand. (Propmodo, April 13)
  • The findings reinforce that improving affordability will require more building, more investment, and fewer barriers to supply—and that policies constraining new housing production could worsen affordability rather than improve it.

New Research

  • Updated research continues to undercut the argument that institutional ownership is the main source of today’s affordability challenges.
  • An AEI report released last week says large institutional investors own less than 1 percent of the nation’s single-family homes and concludes that Section 901 of the Senate’s bill would reduce the supply of newly constructed and rehabilitated homes while burdening low- and middle-income renters. (AEI, April 10)
  • Separate Realtor.com research published in March also found that the institutional investor footprint has been shrinking from its 2022 peak. (Politico, April 14 | Realtor, March 13)
  • Recent market data points in the same direction. If institutional investment were the main cause of the nation’s housing affordability problems, the markets with the heaviest investor activity would be consistently posting the strongest price growth. (Roundtable Weekly, April 10 | GAO Report, April 6 | GAO Report, 2024)
  • The latest Case-Shiller data show the opposite pattern: Chicago and New York led annual home-price gains in December 2025, while several Sun Belt metros where institutional investors have been more prominent—including Tampa, Phoenix, Dallas, and Miami—saw prices decline. That divergence reinforces the broader point that supply constraints, not institutional investment alone, are the bigger force shaping affordability. (S&P Global, December 2025 | Realtor, October 2025)

New Housing Legislation Introduced

  • Separate from the House-Senate standoff, Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) this week introduced the Freedom to Build Act, a proposal backed by The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) that would create a HUD “Freedom to Build” certification for localities adopting pro-supply policies such as faster approvals, regulatory streamlining, and other measures to expand housing construction. (Sen. Hagerty Press Release, April 14)
  • The bill is intended to incentivize deregulation, expand housing supply, and make homes more affordable by aligning existing federal incentives with communities that reduce barriers to building.
  • Jeffrey D. DeBoer, President & CEO of RER said, “This legislation would be a meaningful step toward expanding housing supply and improving affordability for working families. The Freedom to Build Act would align federal incentives with local decision-making to help unlock private capital, enhance housing supply, and support long-term economic growth. The Real Estate Roundtable has long supported policies that promote housing affordability—for renters and homeowners—and strengthen the connection between housing, jobs, and transportation.”

Sen. Hagerty will also be a featured guest at RER’s upcoming Spring Roundtable Meeting next week (Roundtable-level members only), where housing supply, affordability, and related policy developments will be among the topics discussed.