Tag: Infrastructure

Trump Administration Prepares to Unveil Nationwide Infrastructure Proposal; Roundtable Submits Specific Suggestions for Innovative Infrastructure Financing Sources

Posted on by Trey Jackson

A six-page document leaked to the media this week purports to show details of the White House’s anticipated infrastructure plan just before President Trump is scheduled to offer his first State Of The Union address on Jan. 30.  White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters declined to comment on the contents of the leaked document, but said the Administration looks forward to announcing a plan “in the near future.” (Axios, Jan. 22)

A  six-page document  leaked to the media this week purports to show details of the White House’s anticipated infrastructure plan just before President Trump is scheduled to offer his first State Of The Union address on Jan. 30.

According to the document, leaked Monday to Axios and Politico, approximately 10 percent of the plan’s funds would go to  “transformative projects” – a category that includes a “commercial space” sector that could compete for funds.  (CQ, Jan. 25)
 
The  Roundtable on Jan. 11 sent a comment letter to President Trump offering specific suggestions on how innovative financing sources may be used to help pay-for infrastructure – and how restructuring a lengthy permitting process and cutting unnecessary red tape will help control project costs and delays. 
 
Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said that permit streamlining would be an important part of an infrastructure plan. (CQ, Jan. 23).  Barrasso’s committee oversees all public works projects and the Environmental Protection Agency, which would be a path to streamlining EPA and other agencies’ permitting approvals.
 
The  Roundtable letter suggests several innovative financing sources, including:

  • Responsibly and sustainably increase the federal gas “user fee;”
  • Allow states to capture lost tax revenues from Internet sales – and devote it to infrastructure;
  • Attract more foreign investment to U.S. infrastructure by repealing or scaling back the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA);
  • Assess whether IRS “volume caps” and other limitations on private-activity bonds (PABs) should be revised to boost infrastructure development;

The Roundtable on Jan. 11 sent a comment letter to President Trump offering specific suggestions on how innovative financing sources may be used to help pay-for infrastructure – and how restructuring a lengthy permitting process and cutting unnecessary red tape will help control project costs and delays.

  • Couple successful federal loan programs (like TIFIA) with state and local “value capture” techniques to re-pay that debt – and attract private investors;
  • Develop best practices that channel public-private partnerships (P3s) for appropriate projects in appropriate geographies;
  • Prioritize the limited proceeds from the Highway Trust Fund with a “Fix it First” strategy;
  • Limit “formula grants” and move toward performance-based criteria;
  • Enact common sense reform measures that limit taxpayers’ carrying costs for exorbitant liability insurance premiums on public infrastructure projects. 
  • Ease regulatory burdens for projects of same size and scope in same location as existing infrastructure.

More details on each of the suggestions above are included in The Roundtable letter.  
 
Also this week, Special Assistant to the President for Infrastructure Policy DJ Gribbin met on Tuesday with Roundtable members in an open exchange of ideas about a national infrastructure plan.  On Thursday, Gribbin spoke to the U.S. Conference of Mayors about the Trump Administration’s upcoming plan, stating that it will not require any new funding.  Gribbin said that 200 billion dollars in existing federal funds would be shifted to infrastructure projects, which would be leveraged to attract an additional 800 billion in state and private investment. (CQ, Jan. 25)
 
Infrastructure was a major topic of discussion during The Roundtable’s Jan. 24-25 State of the Industry meeting (see story above).  The Roundtable will remain engaged with policymakers as the Administration’s infrastructure plan moves forward in 2018.

Real Estate Roundtable Testifies Before Senate on Business Tax Reform

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Rational Taxation of Real Estate Urged to Spur Job Creation, Encourage Business Expansion and Contribute to GDP Growth

WASHINGTON, DC — Real Estate Roundtable President and Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey DeBoer today testified before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, encouraging modest changes to the current taxation of commercial real estate that would continue to encourage economic growth while cautioning policymakers on specific business tax reform concepts that could cause severe market dislocation.

During today’s Senate hearing on Business Tax Reform, DeBoer testified, “Importantly, commercial real estate markets are largely in balance with supply, only modestly exceeding demand.  Despite our industry’s relative positive health, we know the underlying economy can and should grow more rapidly.”  DeBoer added that The Roundtable is concerned that some concepts under discussion in tax reform are risky, untested and have the potential to cause severe dislocation – not only in real estate markets but in the nations’ capital markets as well.

In his written testimony and his oral statement, The Real Estate Roundtable’s President and CEO addressed specific elements of potential tax reform.  (See Senate Finance Committee webcast and documents at https://www.finance.senate.gov/hearings/business-tax-reform.) Below is a summary of policy issues covered in his testimony:

  • Business interest deduction.  DeBoer noted that interest, the cost of borrowing, is an ordinary and necessary business expense that has always been deductible.  Today, U.S. capital markets are the deepest in the world, but restrictions would deter business formation and expansion.  The impact would fall disproportionately on entrepreneurs and other developers likely to serve small and medium-sized markets.  As interest rates rise, the harm to the economy will grow.
  • Cost recovery / expensing.  Current cost recovery rules need reform, but 100 percent expensing of real estate is a risky and untested proposal.  Accelerated depreciation of real estate in the early 1980s led to tax-driven, uneconomic investment.  Tax rules should reflect the economic life of structures.  Leading research by MIT suggests existing depreciation schedules for real estate are too long.  Shortening depreciation to 20 years would spur sustainable and economically sound investment.   

     

  • Pass-through reform.  U.S. pass-through tax rules create a dynamic, flexible business environment that supports entrepreneurship and productive investment.  Tax reform should provide equitable relief for pass-throughs.  A new, reduced tax rate for pass-through business income should avoid “cliffs”, phase-outs, and carve-outs that discriminate against certain taxpayers and create new economic distortions.    

     

  • Capital gains.  The tax code should encourage entrepreneurial activity and risk-taking through low capital gains rates and continue to recognize that risk can involve more than the contribution of capital.  Reform should also preserve like-kind exchanges, which get properties into the hands of new owners with the time and resources to invest in job-creating property improvements.

     

  • State and local tax deduction.  Tax reform should retain the deductibility of state and local taxes.  Eliminating the state and local tax deduction would undercut the principal source of financing for schools, roads, law enforcement, and other needed infrastructure and public services.

     

  • FIRPTA.  Tax reform should boost job growth and domestic investment by repealing outdated tax barriers to foreign investment in U.S. real estate and infrastructure.

     

  • Infrastructure.  An infrastructure initiative in tax reform is needed to create jobs, reflect the changing transportation needs of Americans and increase productivity, all to benefit the GDP.  

In his testimony, DeBoer said that although tax reform should unleash entrepreneurship, capital formation, and job creation – Congress should also undertake reform with caution, given the potential for economic dislocation and unintended consequences. 

As an example of over-reactive government policies, DeBoer noted past tax reform efforts in 1981 and 1986, which combined, created severe dislocation in real estate markets nationwide; led to job losses and bankruptcies; and contributed to the demise of the savings and loan industry.

The Roundtable’s President and CEO also addressed the federal deduction for state and local property and income taxes. “Ending the federal deduction for state and local property and income taxes could potentially cause significant issues in our nation’s cities, as some businesses relocate for no reason other than taxes. We urge that this idea be rejected,” DeBoer said.

He also testified about the crucial need to preserve interest deductibility.  “Eliminating or limiting the deduction for interest on business debt would cause great dislocation in capital markets, slow economic activity and lessen the unique importance of America’s capital markets,” DeBoer said.

After noting that commercial real estate markets today are estimated to account for nearly 20 percent of America’s GDP and employ millions of Americans, he added that real estate provides local governments with its largest revenue source and plays a key role in the retirement savings and wealth creation of Americans.  “Properly designed tax reform can spur job creation, encourage more robust business expansion and result in a sustainable increase in GDP,” DeBoer testified.  

#  #  #