Category: News

Roundtable Requests Additional Guidance for FIRPTA REIT Regulations

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

Today, The Roundtable wrote to U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen requesting that the Treasury Department provide additional clarifying guidance regarding transition relief in the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act’s (FIRPTA) regulations for domestically controlled REITs.  (Letter)

Key Concerns

  • In April, Treasury issued final regulations that redefined what constitutes a domestically controlled REIT exempt from tax under FIRPTA. The regulations created a new look-through rule that extended the reach of the discriminatory FIRPTA regime to common investment structures. (Roundtable Weekly, April 26)
  • Clarifying guidance is necessary and urgent to enable a qualified investment entity (QIE) to make a timely determination concerning its direct or indirect ownership of “U.S. real property interests” (“USRPI(s)”) under the conditions of the Transition Rule.
  • Impact on foreign investment: Foreign investment can attract significant capital, helping to support market stability and create jobs. The final regulations, designed to define a domestically controlled QIE, are feared to be deterring foreign investment in U.S. real estate.
  • Outstanding questions: Specifically, the letter seeks additional guidance on: what constitutes “direct or indirect” ownership of real estate when it is held by a REIT through multiple subsidiaries, how to treat acquisition costs and capitalization expenditures, and situations where ongoing construction or substantial renovations are occurring. 

Roundtable Advocacy

FIRPTA
  • The Roundtable has consistently advocated for the withdrawal of regulations and policies that hinder foreign investment in U.S. real estate. (Roundtable Weekly, April 26)
  • David Friedline, a tax partner at Deloitte and Vice Chair of RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) said, “The official guidance would provide needed clarification for our members, who have been adversely affected by the final regulations’ new look-through rule, on how to comply with the conditions of the transition relief.”  Friedline was a principal drafter of the Roundtable letter. 
  • Building new affordable housing and office-to-residential conversion projects requires encouraging more investment, not less. Erecting new barriers to passive foreign investment in U.S. real estate runs counter to important bipartisan policy priorities.

The Roundtable remains committed to collaborating with the Treasury to ensure that the final regulations can provide much-needed clarity and stability, supporting the industry’s efforts to attract foreign capital and drive economic growth.

White House Calls on Congress to Enact Federal Rent Price Control Measure, Eliminate Depreciation Write-Offs to Help Reduce Housing Costs

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

This week, the White House unveiled a nationwide rent price control plan that calls on Congress to “pass legislation giving . . . landlords a choice to either cap rent increases on existing units at 5% or risk losing current valuable federal tax breaks.” (White House Fact Sheet)

While the package is focused on imposing flawed rent price control policies and eliminating long-standing depreciation write-offs, it also includes policies to help build more housing. (WSJ, July 16)

Housing Proposals

  • Under President Biden’s plan, beginning this year and for the next two years, owners of rental housing would only be able to take advantage of faster depreciation write-offs if they limit annual rent increases to no more than 5%, effectively trading depreciation deductions for rent price controls.
  • This would apply to landlords with over 50 units in their portfolio, covering more than 20 million units nationwide—nearly half the U.S. rental market. It would include an exception for new construction and substantial renovation or rehabilitation. (White House Fact Sheet)
  • While intended to make renting more affordable, these proposals would impede the production of much-needed housing, particularly for affordable units. (Bloomberg, July 17)
  • The Biden-Harris Housing Plan also includes initiatives to:
    • Call on all federal agencies to assess surplus federal land that can be repurposed to build more affordable housing;
    • Rehabilitate distressed housing, build more affordable housing, and revitalize neighborhoods; and
    • Authorize $325 million in Choice Neighborhoods grants under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to build new deeply-affordable homes and spur economic development in communities across the country.
  • The proposal would require congressional action to become law.

FHFA Proposed Tenant Protections

  • This is the first time tenant protections will be a standard component of Enterprise multifamily financing.   
  • These protections apply to future loans acquired by the Enterprises and would include:
    • Requiring 30-day notice before rent increases;
    • Requiring 30-day notice on lease expiration; and
    • Providing a 5-day grace period before imposing late fees on rental payments.

Industry & Roundtable Response

(L-R): Heidi Sommer (POLITICO), Jeffrey DeBoer (The Real Estate Roundtable), and Shannon McGahn (National Association of Realtors)
  • This week at the Republican National Convention, our National Real Estate Organizations (NREO) partnered with POLITICO to host a series of discussions on the elections, affordable housing, revitalizing cities, the commercial real estate industry, and proactive policy solutions. (Watch here)
  • The Roundtable’s President & CEO Jeffrey DeBoer was a featured speaker alongside Shannon McGahn (National Association of Realtors), joining Heidi Sommer (POLITICO) for a discussion on affordable housing, upcoming tax priorities, interest rates, and the economy.
  • DeBoer stated in response to the administration’s recent rent cap proposal, “Rent control is fundamentally flawed and historically ineffective. Wage and price controls, even during wartime, have consistently failed to deliver the intended results. Implementing such measures now will only exacerbate the root cause of America’s housing problem by discouraging new housing development and reducing investment in existing housing.”

The Roundtable is developing comments on the proposed plans and will continue work to enact measures that will help spur the expansion of America’s affordable housing infrastructure.

Roundtable Requests Voluntary U.S. Guidelines for Climate-Resilient Buildings to Fend Off EU-Based Rules

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

This week, The Roundtable urged the Departments of Treasury, Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency to develop voluntary, science-based guidelines to help U.S. real estate companies align their climate-related programs with global targets. (July 16 letter)

U.S.-Specific Climate Investment Principles

  • Treasury’s principles can guide net-zero corporate commitments in the United States.
  • However, foreign organizations aim to exert significant influence over capital decisions in America’s real estate – which can leave buildings “stranded” in the eyes of some overseas investors because they do not meet “energy requirements being rolled out in Europe.” Bloomberg (June 18)
  • These market risks prompted the Roundtable’s letter requesting voluntary building “decarbonization curves” designed by the U.S. government reflecting climatic, market, and data conditions in our country.
  • Investment principles for America’s real estate “should not be the creation of the European Union,” The Roundtable states.
  • “This is a matter of global economic competitiveness for capital access,” said the Chair of The Roundtable’s Sustainability Policy Advisory Committee, Anthony Malkin (Chairman and CEO, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.). “America’s buildings should not be expected to meet standards that speak to assets, laws, power grids, and regulatory environments in Europe or elsewhere.”

U.S. Energy Programs and Recommendations

Tony Malkin (Chairman and CEO, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.), chair of The Roundtable’s Sustainability Policy Advisory (SPAC) Committee.
Anthony Malkin (Chairman and CEO, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.)
  • Malkin continued, “The United States leads the world in government developed, voluntary guidelines for all types of buildings’ energy use and emissions. Agencies like US-EPA and US-DOE know the conditions of our markets, climate zones, and power grids and can help make it easier for capital to come into real estate and grow jobs and tax revenue in the United States.”
  • The Roundtable urged the U.S. government to develop building “pathways” through a robust public input process that considers the experiences of companies that own, develop, manage and finance America’s real estate.

The Sustainability Policy Advisory Committee (SPAC) will continue to work with the agencies and Congress to shape policies that promote cost-effective investments to optimize building energy efficiency and help the real estate sector mitigate the effects of climate change.

Property Conversions Legislation Introduced

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

On Thursday, House Ways and Means Committee Members Mike Carey (R-OH) and Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) introduced the bipartisan Revitalizing Downtowns and Main Streets Act (H.R.9002), which would create a market-based tax incentive for converting older commercial buildings to residential use.

Revitalizing Downtowns and Main Streets Act

  • The bill is a positive step forward in the effort to modernize U.S. real estate, create new and affordable housing, and strengthen cities and neighborhoods that continue to suffer from the aftereffects of the pandemic and changing business needs. 
  • “Between high housing costs and the rise of remote work, formerly prosperous neighborhoods across the country are struggling,” said Rep. Carey (R-OH). “The solution is right in front of us. But even though vacant commercial and office space is sitting unused, converting these properties into housing is so expensive it is often uneconomical. This bill will allow communities to meet their residents’ need for affordable, abundant housing and allow American downtowns and main streets to thrive.” (Rep. Carey Press Release)
  • The bill would create a new and temporary 20% tax credit for qualified property conversion expenditures, modeled after the historic rehabilitation credit. (RER’S One-Page Summary)
  • The total credit authority would be limited to $15 billion, allocated by state housing finance agencies based on feasibility and impact.
  • Larger credits would be available for projects in rural areas, low-income census tracts, and economically distressed areas.
  • The credit could be stacked with other federal tax benefits, including LIHTC, the rehabilitation credit, and Opportunity Zone benefits. 

Roundtable Advocacy

  • The Real Estate Roundtable has supported similar versions of conversion legislation, such as the Revitalizing Downtowns Act (S. 2511, H.R. 4759), introduced by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA). The Roundtable has also worked closely with the White House on administrative actions designed to provide low-cost financing for conversion projects. (Roundtable Weekly, April 19)
  • “The Revitalizing Downtowns and Main Streets Act is a proactive, market-based policy measure that aims to breathe new life into underutilized commercial properties, create jobs, generate local property tax revenue, and help reinvigorate our nation’s cities and suburbs,” said Jeffrey D. DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable. “We commend the leadership of the bill sponsors for their vision and urge support for this critical bipartisan legislation.”
  • The bill addresses and incorporates most of the recommendations a Roundtable-led coalition had collectively made to the Revitalizing Downtowns Act in comment letters submitted in October 2022 and June 2024.  
  • Since then, many states and localities have taken bold action to support property conversion efforts.
  • Both letters are the product of a property conversions working group created by The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC). The working group has reviewed and considered the challenges and impediments confronting potential property conversion activities. (Roundtable Weekly, June 28)

The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee will continue working with policymakers to advance tax policies that encourage and facilitate property conversion efforts.

Real Estate Coalition Raises Concerns Over Cyber Reporting Requirements

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

A coalition of national real estate associations submitted comments to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) expressing concerns over a new proposed rule: Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (CIRCIA) Reporting Requirements. As currently drafted, the rule imposes overly burdensome requirements and requires companies to assume unnecessary but significant legal and cybersecurity risks. (Letter)

Cyber Incident Reporting Rule

  • Under the current proposal, companies would be required to report significant cyber incidents to the Department of Homeland Security or CISA within 72 hours as well as any ransomware payments within 24 hours.
  • Given the ever-expanding cyber-threat landscape, the rental housing and real estate industry has prioritized defense against vulnerabilities.
  • The industry has undertaken efforts to mitigate cybersecurity risks, implement policies to prevent and mitigate such risks and encourage investments in bolstering cyber defenses to protect data.

  • The letter noted, “We support a unified but flexible regulatory framework for data security and incident notification, and believe it is important to have a balanced approach to providing consumers with meaningful information about material cybersecurity risks and incidents, while also not imposing overly burdensome regulations on the real estate/rental housing industry or unintentionally exposing our members to substantially greater cybersecurity risks.”

Industry Concerns and Recommendations

  • Overly burdensome requirements: CISA should revise the definition of “covered cyber incident” to a higher threshold for reporting to prevent unnecessary administrative load.
  • Disproportionate compliance costs: the estimated compliance cost of over $1.4 billion is seen as disproportionate to the benefits. These funds could be better spent on actual cybersecurity measures rather than on reporting.
  • Reporting deadlines are unclear and increase the risk of attack: the proposed rule’s 72-hour reporting requirement and 24-hour ransom payment reporting deadline could hinder effective incident response and increase vulnerability to additional attacks.
  • The proposed rule adds another reporting requirement to an already cluttered landscape. CISA should harmonize its reporting requirements to reduce compliance burdens.

The Real Estate Roundtable’s Homeland Security Task Force and RE-ISAC will continue to be resources and assist CISA in the development of clear, effective, and secure cyber incident reporting rules.

Roundtable Weekly Will Resume Publication on July 12, 2024

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

The Roundtable’s policy news digest will resume publication on Friday, July 12, 2024.

Recent issues of Roundtable Weekly can be searched by keyword here.

Supreme Court Rules in Case of Federal Taxation of Unrealized Income

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 to uphold the constitutionality of mandatory repatriation tax (MRT) enacted in 2017, but chose to sidestep and not rule on the issue of whether the Constitution imposes a realization requirement on the taxation of income. (Moore v. United States)

Background & The Decision

  • The petitioners in Moore argued that the MRT exceeds Congress’s authority under the 16th Amendment to lay and collect taxes on income. The Moore’s were shareholders of a foreign corporation. The corporation never distributed its earnings, but the MRT taxed the Moore’s on their deemed share of the corporation’s income. The Moore’s argued that the federal government could not tax them on income they never realized. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 13)
  • A decision in favor of the Moore’s could have important consequences for both legislative proposals to tax unrealized gains, but also existing aspects of the tax code and pass-through taxation. 
  • The Ninth Circuit ruled against the Moore’s on the grounds that there is no realization requirement in the Constitution. 
  • The Roundtable has consistently opposed proposals to tax unrealized gains on several grounds, including their constitutionality and the damage they would cause to the economy, entrepreneurship, and productive investment. 
  • The Supreme Court, in a decision authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, stepped back from the sweeping holding by Ninth Circuit and concluded that it did not need to rule on the realization question because the foreign company’s operating income was clearly “realized” by the foreign company. In passing the MRT, Congress was simply attributing (or passing through) that income to its U.S. shareholders. 
  • The 7-2 opinion by Justice Kavanagh was accompanied by two concurring opinions, one from Justice Jackson and one from Justice Barrett (joined by Justice Alito). Justices Thomas and Gorsuch dissented. 
  • While the Real Estate Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) and its members are still parsing the language of the various opinions to understand the broader implications, at the end of the day, there appear to be at least four justices willing to uphold a realization requirement (Barrett, Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch), one justice prepared to hold that realization is not required (Jackson), and four justices who have not yet tipped their hand (Kavanaugh, Roberts, Sotomayor, and Kagan).  See analysis of Moore decision by TPAC member Don Susswein (Principal, RSM US LLP)

The Moore ruling is unlikely the last word in the heated debate over the constitutionality of taxing unrealized gains.

IRS and Treasury Unveil New Rules Aimed at Partnership “Basis-Shifting” Transactions

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

This week, the IRS and Treasury Department announced a multistage regulatory initiative aimed at regulating certain partnership transactions that shift the tax basis of assets and generate additional depreciation deductions, reduce taxable gains, or increase deductible losses. (IRS-Treasury Press Release, June 17)

Guidance Package

IRS building in Washington DC
  • In Notice 2024-54, Treasury and the IRS indicated they intend to issue proposed regulations governing certain transactions that affect the basis of property held by a partnership or distributed by a partnership. The guidance will focus on partnerships that involve related parties or tax-indifferent parties. 
  • Related parties could include family members, corporations and their shareholders, and other entities and businesses with common or overlapping ownership.  It is unclear from the guidance where the administration believes the targeted abuses generating inappropriate tax benefits are most likely to arise (e.g., corporate mergers, family offices, real estate, etc.). 
  • The rules will apply to cost recovery deductions and gain/loss calculations for tax years ending after June 17, 2024, thus covering deductions, gains, or losses attributable to transactions completed in prior years. 

Roundtable Concerns

  • A principal concern voiced at this week’s RER Tax Policy Advisory Committee meeting is related to the broad scope of the new rules. Rather than focusing specifically on identifiable, abusive transactions, Notice 2024-54 states that the forthcoming regulations will provide “mechanical rules applicable to all covered transactions without regard to the taxpayer’s intent and without regard to whether the transactions could be abusive or lacking in economic substance.”
  • Moreover, the Notice states that the regulations will only apply if the transaction results in a basis increase for the relevant property.  “If, and to the extent, property has been allocated a basis decrease, the proposed rules would not apply.”
  • The new rules thus apply to a transaction regardless of whether the transaction is abusive or lacking in economic substance, but only if they result in a negative outcome for the taxpayer.  If the same mechanical rules would generate a positive result for another taxpayer, they are disregarded.  In sum: Heads, IRS wins; tails, taxpayer loses. 

Additional Developments:

Other elements of the regulatory initiative include:

  • Proposed regulations (REG-124593-23) identifying some partnership-related-party basis adjustment transactions as transactions of interest and requiring disclosures by participants and material advisers. 
  • Revenue Ruling 2024-14 notifying taxpayers that it will apply the codified economic substance doctrine to challenge certain basis-shifting transactions. 
  • The IRS Office of Chief Counsel also announced the formation of a new associate office focused exclusively on partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and estates. (TaxNotes, June 17)

The Roundtable’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee will continue its discussion of the partnership basis-shifting issue and how best to respond on its next TPAC Zoom meeting.

Housing Coalition Calls on Lawmakers to Address Rising Insurance Costs

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier

On Monday, The Roundtable as part of a broad housing coalition wrote to policymakers offering solutions to address rising insurance premiums across the nation’s housing market and its significant impact on all stakeholders throughout the commercial real estate industry. (Letter)

Coalition Policy Solutions

  • The lack of affordability and availability of insurance options has both short- and long-term implications for the real estate industry’s ability to address the housing crisis.
  • The letter suggests several measures to mitigate these issues, including regulatory reforms, public-private partnerships, and innovative insurance products tailored toward affordable housing projects.
    • Federal Backstop for Catastrophic Coverage: A federal backstop, similar to terrorism risk and national flood insurance, could help stabilize the market.
    • Adjust Operating Cost Adjustment Factor (OCAF) Methodology at HUD: Use industry data for property and casualty insurers to reflect actual insurance costs for rental housing.
    • Modernize Insurance Requirements: Revise stringent insurance requirements for federally-backed loans to provide more flexibility.
    • Expand Federal Grants and Programs: Leverage existing federal programs to subsidize insurance costs and support resiliency investments.

Unprecedented Insurance Rates

  • The volatility in the insurance market, driven by more frequent natural catastrophes and inflation, has led insurers to raise premiums, increase deductibles, and limit coverage.
  • Rising insurance premiums significantly impact housing providers, developers, and renters across the U.S., exacerbating housing affordability challenges and disincentivizing providers from participating in the affordable housing market.
  • Insurance rates have surged dramatically, with property insurance rates increasing for 25 consecutive quarters and casualty insurance rates for 17.
  • Over the past three years, affordable rental housing communities have seen premium increases ranging from 30% to 100%.

  • An October 2023 survey and report, commissioned by the National Leased Housing Association (NLHA), found that affordable housing providers are facing much higher premiums, with nearly one in every three policies experiencing rate increases of 25% or more in the most recent renewal period.

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

  • A recent report by the Joint Economic Committee Democrats found that the total annual economic burden of flooding in the United States is between $179.8 and $496 billion—equivalent to 1-2% of U.S. GDP in 2023. (JEC Report on Flooding)
  • Congress has enacted 30 short-term extensions of the NFIP. The most recent stopgap spending bill extended the NFIP’s funding through September 2024. (PoliticoPro, June 10)
  • The Roundtable has been a long-standing supporter of a long-term reauthorization of the NFIP with appropriate reforms.
  • A long-term reauthorization of the NFIP is essential for residential markets, overall natural catastrophe insurance market capacity, and the broader economy.

The Roundtable, along with its industry partners, continues to work constructively with policymakers and stakeholders to address commercial insurance gaps and rising costs through targeted policy solutions that can help alleviate the burden on housing providers and ensure the availability of affordable housing nationwide.

Roundtable Founding Member and TPAC Chairman Frank G. Creamer, Jr. Passes

Posted on by Abigail Grenadier
Frank G. Creamer, Jr.

Frank G. Creamer, Jr., a founding member of The Real Estate Roundtable and long-serving chairman of its Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC), passed away on May 17. (Obituary)

Industry Mentor

  • “Frank Creamer offered his deep expertise and knowledge to so many in the industry during his 25 years of involvement with RER,” said Jeffrey DeBoer, Roundtable President and CEO. “In his long-time role as TPAC Chairman, Frank was a tremendous mentor and reliable guide who cared deeply about The Roundtable, its role in the industry, and its members. His dedication was exemplary, and he will be remembered as the consummate gentleman he most certainly was, who always had time for others. We will sorely miss Frank and extend our heartfelt condolences to his family and friends.”
  • Mr. Creamer held various executive positions during his career in the global commercial real estate lending business, rising to oversee all real estate banking at Citibank. After his tenure at Citibank, he became a principal and owner of his company, FGC Advisors, LLC, a real estate advisory firm.

A memorial service is scheduled for June 5 in Center Moriches, NY followed by a June 6 funeral Mass at St. John the Evangelist Roman Catholic Church. In lieu of flowers, a donation in his memory can be made to the Tunnels to Towers Foundation. (See obituary for details)