Tag: Basel III

Fed Chair Powell Testifies on Monetary Policy Outlook, Proposal to Ease Bank Capital Requirements, and Basel III Endgame

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

In a busy week for Fed policy, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell delivered his semiannual monetary policy report to Congress, testifying at a pair of House and Senate hearings on the state of the U.S. economy. Powell also fielded questions from policymakers on a new proposal unveiled this week to ease capital requirements for large banks and the state of Basel III Endgame.

Policy Outlook

  • In testimony before the House Financial Services Committee and Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, Chair Powell defended the Fed’s decision to hold interest rates steady last week. (Roundtable Weekly, June 20)

  • With consumer confidence weakening and inflation risks from tariffs and Middle East tensions rising, the Fed faces competing pressures that could challenge price stability.
  • On Capitol Hill this week, Chair Powell reiterated the Fed’s wait-and-see approach, saying, “For the time being, we are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.” (Federal Reserve, June 24)
  • Two Trump-appointed Fed officials, Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and board member Christopher Waller, signaled support for cutting interest rates as soon as July. Their public stance diverges from the majority of Fed officials, seven of whom do not anticipate any rate cuts this year, highlighting an unusual divergence among Fed leadership. (Axios, June 24)

The Fed’s New Proposal

  • On Wednesday, the Fed advanced a proposal to reform the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) in a 5-2 vote, which would reduce capital requirements for relatively low-risk assets, like U.S. Treasury markets. (Reuters, June 25)
  • The SLR was originally designed as a backstop to risk-based capital requirements to ensure that large banks hold a sufficient amount of capital, regardless of the riskiness of those assets. (ABA Journal, June 23)
  • Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), Chair of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, noted at the Senate hearing with Chair Powell, the backstop has “too often” acted as a binding requirement for U.S. banks, which could harm the effective functioning of U.S. Treasury markets during periods of distress and discourage banks from engaging in low-risk activity.
  • The proposed modifications are intended to make it less expensive for large banks to hold less risky assets, so that more capital is freed up for banks to invest in Treasuries and other low-risk markets.

  • Vice Chair Bowman touted the proposal as an “important first step in balancing the stability of the financial system and Treasury market resilience, while preserving safety and soundness and restoring the SLR as a backstop.” (PoliticoPro, June 25)

  • Chair Powell similarly highlighted the benefits of the reform proposal, noting that “it will not in any way diminish the safety and soundness of the financial system.” (Senate Hearing, June 25)

  • The Fed published a notice of proposed rulemaking on the proposal, opening it for public comment.
  • RER plans to comment on the proposal and its implications for the commercial real estate industry.  The organization’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) is working on a response to the notice of proposed rulemaking and welcomes member input.

Basel III Endgame

The Federal Reserve in Washington, DC
  • Chair Powell was also asked about the Fed’s plans for Basel III Endgame, which stalled after the proposal was met with widespread criticism from policymakers and industry associations last year.

  • Chair Powell told policymakers that the Fed would take a “fresh start” at Basel III in light of the feedback it received. He agreed that the original proposal’s capital requirements were excessive and “very significantly exceeded” the Basel requirements, suggesting that it will be further revised. (American Banker, June 25)

  • RER strongly opposed the original Basel III proposal, pointing out the significant economic costs it would incur without clear benefits to the economy, recommending that it be withdrawn and only reissued after further study.
  • Bowman, the newly appointed Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve, is actively involved in reviewing and potentially reforming the Basel III endgame proposal to make it more capital-neutral for U.S. banks.
  • Tighter capital requirements and higher costs would come at a time when the commercial real estate industry is facing a wave of maturing loans, undermining the ability of owners and developers to restructure debt and fill the equity gap. So it is important for the Agencies to recalibrate their proposal accordingly to avert increased borrowing costs and reduced credit capacity for real estate and the overall economy.

Chair Powell’s term at the Fed isn’t up until May 2026—but reports indicate that President Trump is considering announcing his pick to succeed Powell far in advance, potentially a candidate who is more amenable to lowering interest rates on an accelerated timeline.

RECPAC Fall Meeting Spotlights Upcoming Policy Opportunities and Challenges in Real Estate Capital Markets

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) convened this week in New York to address market conditions, pressing policy issues, including Basel III Endgame, shifts in capital markets, and the evolving political and regulatory landscape.

Fall RECPAC Meeting

  • RECPAC met Tuesday, under the leadership of RECPAC Co-Chairs Bryan McDonnell (Head of U.S. Debt and Chair of Global Debt, PGIM Real Estate), Rex Rudy (EVP, Head of Commercial Real Estate, US Bank), Miriam Wheeler (Global Head Real Estate Finance, Goldman Sachs Asset Management), and Working Group Chair Michael Lascher (Global Head of Real Estate Debt Capital Markets, Blackstone) to discuss the new political landscape and top policy priorities for 2025.
  • Roundtable Chair Kathleen McCarthy (Global Co-Head, Blackstone Real Estate) kicked off the meeting and welcomed RECPAC members to the meeting, sharing her insights on real estate credit and capital markets. Other discussions included:
  • Overview of Real Estate Capital Markets: Mark Gibson (CEO, JLL Capital Markets, Americas) provided an overview of current economic and real estate market conditions, investment capital flows, interest rate trends, and their impact on financing.
  • Political and Regulatory Landscape: Wayne Berman (Head of Government Affairs, Blackstone) discussed the new political landscape, and its implications for financial services and tax policy, credit, and capital market issues.
  • U.S. Economic Outlook: David Mericle (Chief US Economist, Goldman Sachs) presented his views on the U.S. economic outlook, including growth prospects and recession risks.
  • Global Real Estate Credit Markets Roundtable: Nick Seidenberg (Managing Director, Eastdil) led a discussion on global real estate credit markets, joined by Jeff Krasnoff (CEO, Rialto Capital), Bryan McDonnell (Chair, Global Debt and Agriculture, PGIM), Rex Rudy (EVP, U.S. Bank), Miriam Wheeler (Global Head, Real Estate Financing, Goldman Sachs), and Greg Wolkom (Group Head, Real Estate Syndicated Finance and REIT Finance, Wells Fargo).

Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S (CFIUS)

  • This week, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, as Chair of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), finalized a previously proposed rule expanding both the types of military installations covered by its regulations governing reviews of real estate transactions and the number of military installations subject to those reviews. (Axios, Nov. 18)
  • Under the proposed rule issued in July, foreign land transactions within a mile of 40 additional military installations and within 100 miles of 19 additional military sites would trigger a CFIUS review. (Roundtable Weekly, July 12)
  • The finalized rule, which impacts transactions entered into on or after December 9, 2024, continues the trend toward reviews of more real estate transactions based on their proximity to a growing list of military installations deemed “sensitive,” and also allows for greater growth by changing the definition of “military installations” that can become subject to these regulations in the future. (Morgan Lewis, Nov. 18)
  • Nearly 60 military installations will be added to an existing list of military installations and approximately 10 existing installations will be extended for CFIUS jurisdiction purposes.
  • During their annual conference this week, CFIUS mentioned that the renewable energy industry has been a particular area of focus triggering jurisdiction over real estate transactions, due to the critical infrastructure component. (The National Law Review, Nov. 20)

Basel III Endgame

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr
  • Barr, the Fed’s top regulatory official, said the central bank will not be moving ahead with its plan to hike capital requirements for big banks, also known as Basel III Endgame, or move on any proposals to overhaul rules affecting bank liquidity and long-term debt over the next two months. (Politico Pro, Nov. 20)
  • “I expect to work with my new colleagues at the OCC and the FDIC in the coming year on those measures to get their policy input, their perspectives,” Barr said.
  • Earlier this year, RER raised industry concerns about the negative impact of the Basel III proposal in a Jan. 12 letter to the Fed and other agencies. The comments outlined how the proposal would decrease real estate credit availability, increase borrowing costs for commercial and multifamily real estate properties, and negatively impact the U.S. economy, concluding with a call to federal regulators to withdraw their proposed rulemaking. (Roundtable Weekly, Sept. 19)
  • New regulators are expected to lead the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) when President-elect Trump takes office in January 2025.

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will continue to engage with policymakers on any further changes to the Basel III Endgame proposal and other federal policy issues impacting credit capacity and capital formation.

Fed Revises Basel III Endgame Proposal

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael S. Barr previewed the latest revisions to the Basel III Endgame capital requirements this week. Amid industry opposition, Barr scaled back his initial proposal to raise capital requirements for large banks, offering a more measured approach to the rule. (Bloomberg, Sept. 10)

Basel III & CRE

  • The revised proposal would increase aggregate Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital requirements for global systemically important banks by roughly 9%—half of what would have been required in the original proposal.
  • Banks with assets between $100 billion and $250 billion are now exempt from most of the proposed changes, except for recognizing unrealized gains and losses in regulatory capital. (Politico, Sept. 10)
  • “There are benefits and costs to increasing capital requirements,” Barr said during his September 9 remarks at the Brookings Institution. “The changes we intend to make will bring these two important objectives into better balance, in light of the feedback we have received.” (Barr’s Speech | Bloomberg, Sept. 10)
  • The proposal reduces risk weights for certain residential mortgages, and retail exposures, extending this reduction to low-risk corporate debt. However, commercial real estate risk weights remain unclear.
  • Non-GSIB banks would see a long-term increase of 3 to 4% in capital requirements, mainly from the inclusion of unrealized gains and losses. Other changes are expected to add just 0.5% to their capital obligations.
  • The Roundtable raised industry concerns about the negative impact of the Basel III proposal in a Jan. 12 letter to the Fed and other agencies. The comments outlined how the proposal would decrease real estate credit availability, increase borrowing costs for commercial and multifamily real estate properties, and negatively impact the U.S. economy, concluding with a call to federal regulators to withdraw their proposed rulemaking. (Roundtable Weekly, Mar. 29)

What’s Next

  • An open Board meeting is expected to be scheduled to review the revised plan, with an announcement expected as early as Sept. 19. The plan will be open to public comment for 60 days once released.
  • While this new proposal is an improvement of the original plan, we remain concerned that any increase in capital requirements will have a pro-cyclical impact on credit capacity and still carry a cost for commercial real estate and the overall economy.

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will continue to monitor and respond to any further changes to the Basel III Endgame proposal and other federal policy issues impacting credit capacity and capital formation.

Federal Regulators Signal Significant Changes for Proposed Bank Capital Hikes

Posted on by Trey Jackson
The Federal Reserve in Washington, DC

Proposed regulations that would dramatically hike capital requirements for the nation’s largest banks may undergo significant changes, which could include a 50 percent reduction in the current mandated increase, according to sources cited by The Wall Street Journal on May 19.

Proposed Capital Requirements

  • Top officials from the Fed are working with regulators from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) on “negotiating substantive and technical revisions” to the current proposal, known as the “Basel III Endgame.” (WSJ, May 19)
  • The Real Estate Roundtable strongly opposes the current proposal, which would hike capital requirements by approximately 19 percent for banks with at least $100 billion in assets. (Roundtable Weekly, March 29)
  • Barclay estimates the proposal, if approved without changes, would require eight U.S. global systemically important banks to hold approximately $150 billion more in capital. (WSJ, May 23)

Roundtable Response

Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer testifies before House Oversight Subcommittee on April 30, 2024
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer testified this month before a House subcommittee on the health of CRE markets and offered Roundtable policy recommendations, which included rejection of the Basel III Endgame—along with other pro-cyclical regulatory measures that would restrict credit and capital formation. (Roundtable Weekly, May 3 | DeBoer’s oral statement and written testimony)
  • Additionally, a Jan. 12 Roundtable letter and Jan. 16 industry coalition letter urged federal banking regulators to withdraw the proposed rule, emphasizing its potential negative impact on available credit capacity for commercial real estate transactions, market liquidity, and economic growth. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 19)

Policymakers Signal Adjustments

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr
  • The proposal has been met by internal disagreement and concerns among the seven-member Fed Board. (Roundtable Weekly, March 29)
  • Michael Barr, the Fed’s Vice Chair for Supervision, said in a May 20 speech that the central bank is exploring “targeted adjustments” to bank liquidity rules, including Basel III.  In March, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell testified before congressional committees that he expects regulators to “make broad and material changes” to the Basel III proposal. (PoliticoPro, May 20 and Roundtable Weekly, March 8)

The Roundtable’s all-member Annual Meeting on June 20-21 in Washington, DC will address Basel III Endgame and other capital and credit issues impacting CRE.

#  #  #

Fed Signals Significant Changes Ahead for Basel III Endgame Proposal

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Federal Reserve Board Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr said in a recent speech that he is working with other regulators on “broad and material changes” to a sweeping banking proposal known as the “Basel III Endgame.” The proposal, opposed by The Roundtable, would hike capital requirements for banks with at least $100 billion in assets by approximately 19 percent. (Bloomberg, March 22, 2024 and Congressional Research Service, Nov. 30, 2023)

Fed Statements

  • Barr said during his March 22 University of Michigan remarks, “I am working very closely with (Fed) Chair (Jerome) Powell and other members of our Federal Reserve board to try to reach a broad consensus” on revisions to the proposal.
  • The Fed, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved the 1,100-page proposed rulemaking last July by an unusually close 4-2 vote.  See Interagency Overview of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Amendments to the Regulatory Capital Rule, July 27. (Roundtable Weekly, July 28, 2023)
  • Powell voted for the original rulemaking proposal but noted a significant tone of caution. Statements by Fed Governors Michelle W. Bowman and Christopher J. Waller bolstered their opposition to the proposal.

Basel III and CRE

The Federal Reserve Building in Washington DC
  • The Real Estate Roundtable urged federal regulators to withdraw the proposed rulemaking in a Jan. 12 letter that raised industry concerns about its negative impact. The comments outlined how the proposal would decrease real estate credit availability, increase commercial and multifamily properties’ borrowing costs, and negatively impact the U.S. economy.
  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer also stated in a March 2023 comment letter to Barr and other key regulators, “At this critical time, it is important that the agencies do not engage in pro-cyclical policies such as requiring financial institutions to increase capital and liquidity levels to reflect current mark to market models. These policies would have the unintended consequence of further diminishing liquidity and creating additional downward pressure on asset values.”
  • The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) reported last month that 20 percent ($929 billion) of the $4.7 trillion of outstanding commercial mortgages held by lenders and investors will mature in 2024. That represents a 28 percent increase from the $729 billion that matured in 2023, according to MBA’s Commercial Real Estate Survey of Loan Maturity Volumes.

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) will respond to any further changes to the Basel III proposal or other federal policies impacting capital and credit issues.

#   #   #

Fed Chairman Testifies on Regional Bank Loan Concentrations in CRE, Basel III Proposal Changes

Posted on by Trey Jackson
Fed Chair Jerome Powell addressed CRE concerns in an exchange with Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell testified before congressional committees this week about the risks posed by commercial real estate loans to regional banks—and that he expects “broad and material changes” to a regulatory proposal to hike bank capital requirements known as “Basel III.” (The Hill, March 7 and Reuters, March 6)

CRE Concerns & Banking

  • The Senate and House hearings focused on the Fed’s March 1 Monetary Policy Report to Congress. The publication stated, “Credit quality at banks remained strong, although the quality of CRE loans backed by office, retail, and multifamily buildings continued its decline, a result of the lower demand for downtown real estate prompted by the shift toward telework.” The report also noted, “Low levels of transactions in the office sector likely indicated that prices had not yet fully reflected the sector’s weaker fundamentals.”
  • During a March 7 Senate Banking Committee hearing, Fed Chair Powell responded to questions from Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) that he expects some smaller banks with high commercial real estate office concentrations will fail, but that risks posed by these loans are “manageable.” (Watch a video clip of the exchange, above)
  • Similar concerns were raised by policymakers with Powell during a March 6 House Financial Services Committee hearing. The Fed chair addressed why he expects manageable bank losses and added, “We’ve had a secular change in the economy, which has left office demand significantly lower, at least temporarily, and perhaps for a long time. The same is true in some downtown retail (properties) associated with office workers. So it’s a shock to the system.”

Basel III Changes

Senate Banking Committee
  • The committees also heard Powell state that the “Basel III” regulatory proposal, which would significantly increase capital requirements for banks with at least $100 billion in assets, is likely to be overhauled after an enormous private sector response. He commented to the Senate panel, “We do hear the concerns and I do expect that there will be broad and material changes to the proposal.” He told House lawmakers that a rewrite of the proposal is a “very plausible option.” (Fortune and GlobeSt, March 7 | Bloomberg and PolitcoPro, March 6)
  • The Real Estate Roundtable raised industry concerns about the negative impact of the Basel III proposal in a Jan. 12 letter to the Fed and other agencies. The comments outlined how the proposal would decrease real estate credit availability, increase borrowing costs for commercial and multifamily real estate properties, and negatively impact the U.S. economy—and urged federal regulators to withdraw their proposed rulemaking.
  • The New York Times DealBook reported this week that Basel III could crimp lending as some banks struggle with office portfolios and a looming “maturity wall” of $1.5 trillion in CRE loans come due over the next two years. (New York Times, Feb. 7)

Industry Views

  • On March 6, Roundtable Board Member Scott Rechler (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, RXR) told CNBC’s Squawkbox that high interest rates, price discovery, and the amount of maturing CRE loans have resulted in a “slow-moving train wreck” for regional banks.
  • Rechler, a member of the New York Fed’s Board of Directors, said, “There’s a balance. The longer rates stay higher, there’s more distress. For the industry, there’s enough imbalance right now that some level of rates moderating will help ease this transition.  Capital structures are upside down. They’re going to need to be re-equitized, there’s going to be write-offs. So if you can bring down (interest rates), it can create some transaction activity.” (Squawkbox, March 6)
  • Squawkbox also featured Roundtable Member Marty Burger (Infinity Global Real Estate Partners CEO and former Silverstein Properties CEO) on Feb. 28 to discuss office-to-residential conversion opportunities in the current CRE environment. (CNBC, Feb. 28)

Today, RER’s Immediate Past Chair Debra Cafaro (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ventas, Inc.) discussed the CRE market with a focus on the senior housing sector on Bloomberg Markets. “For the commercial real estate sector writ large, those tightening financial conditions are having an impact, particularly in sectors like office, where you have the demand fall off. There will be an impact on the smaller lenders. It is something the system will have to absorb over time with $1 trillion of real estate loans coming due in 2024. It is having an effect. The best elixir for that might be lower rates,” Cafaro said.

#  #  #

Roundtable and Industry Coalition Raise Concerns About Negative Impact of Basel III Endgame Proposal

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable has raised concerns about the negative impact that the “Basel III Endgame” regulatory proposal would have on real estate credit and capital markets, urging federal banking regulators to withdraw their proposed rulemaking to increase capital requirements for banks with at least $100 billion in assets. The Roundtable’s letter Jan. 12 outlines how the proposal would decrease real estate credit availability, increase costs to commercial and multifamily real estate borrowers, and negatively impact the U.S. economy. (Roundtable comment letter)

Industry Opposition

  • The Roundtable letter states, “The largest U.S. banks’ capital and liquidity levels have grown dramatically since the original Basel III standards were implemented in 2013 in response to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. So it is not clear what problem regulators are trying to solve with this proposed capital hike.”
  • The letter also noted that raising capital levels at the largest U.S. banks will only limit credit and feed a downward spiral that will put additional pressure on the financial system.
  • Additionally, The Roundtable filed a Jan. 16 letter, along with a coalition of nine national industry trade groups in opposition to the proposal, citing its potential negative impact on available credit capacity for commercial real estate transactions, market liquidity, and economic growth. (Industry coalition letter)

Fed Weighing Possible Changes

The Federal Reserve in Washington, DC

Federal Reserve officials are considering possible adjustments to key parts of the proposal, “including operational risk calculations and potential offsets for mortgage servicing,” according to the Federal Reserve’s Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr. “The public comment(s) that we’re getting on this is really critical for us getting it right. We take it very, very seriously,” Barr said. (Reuters and PoliticoPro, Jan. 9)

  • The Roundtable joined a coalition of 17 national trade associations in a letter to the Federal Reserve to oppose the proposal on Nov. 14. (U.S. Chamber of Commerce-led coalition letter, Nov. 14 and Axios, Nov. 16)
  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer also stated in a March 2023 comment letter to Barr and other key regulators, “At this critical time, it is important that the agencies do not engage in pro-cyclical policies such as requiring financial institutions to increase capital and liquidity levels to reflect current mark to market models. These policies would have the unintended consequence of further diminishing liquidity and creating additional downward pressure on asset values.”

Wave of Impending CRE Maturities

  • This month’s Roundtable and industry coalition letters emphasize the banking proposal’s negative impact on real estate. The regulators estimate their own proposal would raise capital on the target institutions by 16% on average, which could have a profoundly negative impact on the availability of credit for commercial and multifamily real estate development—especially as interest rates remain high and the need for more affordable housing continues to grow.
  • The coalition letter also notes that the commercial and multifamily real estate industry is a $20 trillion dollar market supported by $5.82 trillion of commercial real estate debt, of which 50% is held by commercial banks.
  • Of that total debt, more than $2 trillion of CRE loans are maturing over the next four years. The letters address how the risks of raising capital levels at the largest U.S. banks would limit credit and exert downward pressure on the financial system.

National Media Reports Focus on CRE Pressures

Scott Rechler, left, speaks with 60 Minutes
  • This week, The Wall Street Journal reported on the impending wave of commercial real estate debt, which increases “the prospect of a surge in defaults as property owners are forced to refinance at higher rates.” The article also cited Trepp data showing that $602 billion in total debt backed by office buildings and other commercial real estate comes due in 2027. (WSJ, Jan. 16)
  • Additionally, CBS’ 60 Minutes on Jan. 14 televised a report on the pressures facing CRE that featured Roundtable Board Member Scott Rechler (Chairman and CEO, RXR), above left. “This post-COVID world of higher interest rates, the changing nature of how people work and live, we’re not going back to where we were,” Rechler said. “And it’s going to be turbulent.”

Capital and credit issues facing CRE will be a focus of discussion at next week’s all-member Roundtable State of the Industry meeting on Jan. 23-24 in Washington, DC.

#  #  #

The Roundtable and Coalition Request Reproposal of Basel III Capital Rulemaking as Banking Regulators Face Bipartisan Congressional Opposition

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The Real Estate Roundtable joined a coalition of 17 national trade associations in a Nov. 14 letter to the Federal Reserve, urging regulators to repropose a sweeping set of proposed rules—known as the “Basel III Endgame”—that would increase capital requirements for the nation’s largest banks. Meanwhile, the nation’s top federal banking regulators testified this week before congressional committees, where they faced stiff bipartisan opposition to the proposal. (U.S. Chamber of Commerce-led coalition letter, Nov. 14 and Axios, Nov. 16)

Bipartisan Opposition

  • In July, the regulators jointly approved the 1,100-page proposed Basel III rulemaking, which aims to guard against potential risk by increasing capital requirements for banks with at least $100 billion in assets. The proposal could have a significant impact on available credit capacity for commercial real estate transactions, as well as undermine liquidity and economic growth. (Roundtable Weekly, Nov. 10 and CQ, Nov. 15)
  • Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) stated that higher capital standards could impede investment in clean energy while Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) emphasized that higher capital requirements pose a risk for mortgage loans to low-income and minority buyers. (Axios, Nov. 14)
  • Before the hearings, Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Tim Scott (R-SC) led 38 of his colleagues in a Nov. 13 letter to the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to withdraw the Basel III Endgame proposal.
  • House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry (R-NC) and Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy Chairman Andy Barr (R-KY) also sent letters to the regulators on Nov. 14, claiming the Basel III regulations would put the nation’s financial system at a competitive disadvantage.

More Feedback for Basel III

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr
  • During the hearings, the Fed’s Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr defended the proposals, yet responded that regulators are “quite open to comment, and we want to improve the rule before we get to a final rule.”
  • On Oct. 20, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC announced an extension of the comment period on the Basel capital proposal from Nov. 30, 2023 to Jan. 16, 2024. The agencies also launched a quantitative impact study to clarify the estimated effects of the proposal, with the data collection deadline also due Jan. 16.
  • Since the deadline for stakeholder comments is the same day as the impact study’s final data collection deadline, there is broad concern that the regulators’ failed to provide industry participants with an opportunity to assess and comment on any of the Agencies’ collected data.  (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 27)

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) discussed the capital requirements proposal during its Nov. 8 meeting in New York. RECPAC welcomes Roundtable membership input as it works on a Basel III comment letter due in January. (Contact Roundtable Senior Vice President Chip Rodgers)

#  #  #

Policymakers Address Basel III Endgame’s Capital Requirements Proposal

Posted on by Trey Jackson

This week, policymakers addressed proposed regulations to increase capital requirements for the nation’s largest banks, known as the “Basel III Endgame,” which could have a significant impact on available credit capacity for commercial real estate transactions, as well as undermine liquidity and economic growth.

Congressional Hearings

  • The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy, chaired by Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY), held a Nov. 7 hearing focused on an array of federal financial regulations, including the Basel III proposal.
  • Chairman Barr stated that U.S. financial regulators have increasingly ceded portions of their authority to international and domestic intergovernmental organizations, which has decreased transparency in development of U.S. regulatory frameworks and reduced regulators’ accountability. (Barr’s opening remarks, Nov. 7 and Committee memo, Nov. 2)
  • House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry (R-NC) and Subcommittee Chairman Barr recently requested the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to examine the role U.S. federal banking agencies played in developing the recent international Basel proposal. (McHenry-Barr Letter, Oct 20)
  • The Senate Banking Committee announced that top U.S. financial regulators will testify on Nov. 14 about their sweeping plan to increase bank capital requirements.

Views from the Regulators

  • Federal banking regulators announced last month an extension of the comment period on the Basel capital proposal from Nov. 30, 2023 to Jan. 16, 2024. Additionally, the agencies announced a quantitative impact study to clarify the estimated effects of the proposal, with data collection due the same date as the comments—Jan. 16. (Fed news releases, Oct 20)
  • While the quantitative impact study is a positive development, the timing of the study fails to provide industry participants with the opportunity to assess its results or comment on the collected data before the Jan. 16 deadline. Regulators often grant the public ample time (120 days) to analyze and comment on such an impact study after it is released. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 27)
  • This week, Fed Governor Michelle Bowman criticized the scope of the Basel proposal in two speeches. On Nov. 7 and today, Governor Bowman stated, “While the capital proposal reflects elements of the agreed upon Basel standards, it is not a mere implementation of the Basel standards. In this proposal, the calibration—with a large increase in capital requirements for U.S. firms—far exceeds the Basel standards mandate. There has been growing support for improving the proposal’s quantitative, analytical foundations, including the need for and impact of capital increases of this scale.”

The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) met in New York City yesterday to discuss the Basel proposal, other federal policies impacting capital and credit issues, and market conditions. RECPAC has established a working group on Basel III to develop comments, due by Nov. 30, on the Basel III Endgame proposal.

#  #  #

Federal Regulators Announce Extension of Comment Period and Quantitative Impact Study on Basel III Proposal

Posted on by Trey Jackson

U.S. banking regulators issued two announcements on Oct. 20 related to their sweeping set of proposed rules to increase capital requirements for the nation’s largest banks, which could significantly affect liquidity available for commercial real estate transactions, impact asset values, and influence economic growth. The proposal, known as the “Basel III Endgame,” is the last major regulatory response designed to address failures from the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. (Bloomberg and Reuters, Oct. 20 | Roundtable Weekly, July 28)

Stakeholder Comments

  • The Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced an extension of the comment period on the Basel capital proposal from Nov. 30, 2023 to Jan. 16, 2024. Additionally, the agencies announced a quantitative impact study to clarify the estimated effects of the proposal, with data collection due the same date as the comments – Jan. 16. (Fed news releases, Oct 20)
  • While the quantitative impact study is a positive development, the timing of the study fails to provide industry participants with the opportunity to assess its results or comment on the collected data before the Jan. 16 deadline. Regulators often grant the public ample time (120 days) to analyze and comment on such an impact study after it is released.
  • The Basel proposal will be among the topics discussed at The Roundtable’s Real Estate Capital Policy Advisory Committee (RECPAC) Nov. 8 meeting in New York. RECPAC welcomes membership input as it works on a comment letter on the announcements and proposal. (Contact Roundtable Senior Vice President Chip Rodgers)
  • In July, the regulators jointly approved the 1,100-page proposed rulemaking, which would substantially revise the regulatory capital framework for banking organizations with total assets of $100 billion or more
  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer stated in a March 2023 comment letter to Fed Vice Chair Michael Barr and other key regulators, “At this critical time, it is important that the agencies do not engage in pro-cyclical policies such as requiring financial institutions to increase capital and liquidity levels to reflect current mark to market models. These policies would have the unintended consequence of further diminishing liquidity and creating additional downward pressure on asset values.

Congressional Opposition

  • Last week, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry (R-NC), above, and Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy Subcommittee Chairman Andy Barr (R-KY) requested the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to examine the role U.S. federal banking agencies played in developing the recent Basel proposal.  (McHenry-Barr Letter, Oct 20)
  • The House Republicans’ letter claimed the scope and process of the banking regulators’ plan is flawed, and noted how the proposal was opposed by some members on the Federal Reserve and FDIC Boards. Their letter concluded, “Given those fatal problems with your Basel III Endgame proposal, we urge that it be withdrawn.”

Goldman Sachs’ 10,000 Small Businesses Voices recently announced the launch of a multifaceted national media campaign that will urge the Federal Reserve to abandon the proposed Basel III Endgame regulation. The campaign will feature new survey data showing 87% of small business owners say it is important for their elected officials to weigh in with The Fed about the impact of new bank capital requirements.

#  #  #