Tag: Section 163(j)

New Senate Legislation Takes Aim at Wall Street but Threatens to Disrupt U.S. Real Estate

Posted on by Julian Anderson

Legislation introduced in the House and Senate on Sept. 24 aims to fundamentally reform the private equity industry, but the expansive legislation could cause major disruption to U.S. real estate values and markets.

The newly revised Stop Wall Street Looting Act, introduced by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and seven other Democratic senators, as well as a coalition of progressive House members, would raise the tax rate on REIT investors, end capital gains treatment for carried interest, and greatly restrict the deductibility of interest on real estate borrowing. (Senate Banking Committee, Sept. 24 | Bill Text)

State of Play

  • Sponsors seek to rein in investment by private funds. The bill authors seek to build on their successful effort this summer to expand the government’s role in regulating private investment in single-family rental housing. The legislation would impose restrictions on the activities of private funds, including their acquisitions, distributions, and business operations such as outsourcing jobs or closing facilities. (Section-by-Section Summary, Sept. 24)
  • Legislation’s reach extends beyond Wall Street. The legislation would have far-reaching consequences for REITs, REIT investors, and real estate generally. While the sponsors highlight a specific case involving REIT ownership of health care-related property, the bill would raise the tax rate on all REIT investors by repealing the 20% deduction for qualified REIT dividends (Section 199A). (Section-by-Section Summary, Sept. 24)
  • Carried interest. The bill also incorporates the Carried Interest Fairness Act (S. 445), introduced by Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI). The Carried Interest Fairness Act would recharacterize all carried interest income as ordinary income rather than capital gains. (Section-by-Section Summary, Sept. 24)
  • Interest deductibility. The bill would restrict business interest deductions under Section 163(j) for certain businesses controlled by private investment funds if the business has a rate of leverage (debt-to-equity ratio) greater than 50%. The proposal would calculate leverage using the adjusted basis of a business’s assets rather than market value, potentially overstating the leverage on appreciated real estate. Qualifying businesses that meet the bill’s conditions would also lose access to the existing real estate exception from the Section 163(j) limitation. (Section-by-Section Summary, Sept. 24)
  • Health care real estate and fund fees. Other provisions would prohibit federal health care payments to certain entities that sell or pledge assets to REITs and modify rules governing taxable REIT subsidiaries that operate health care properties. Additionally, it would impose a 100% tax on certain fees, often called “monitoring” or “transaction” fees, paid by fund-controlled companies to private fund managers. (Section-by-Section Summary, Sept. 24)
  • Outlook for the bill. While action on the legislation is unlikely in the near term, the sponsors will likely seek to include some or all of the provisions in tax legislation next year if control of either chamber changes.

Why It Matters

  • Taken together, the proposed changes could affect a broad range of real estate businesses and investors beyond private equity funds. Eliminating the Section 199A deduction for qualified REIT dividends and changing the tax treatment of carried interest would increase tax burdens and discourage investment in real estate partnerships, REITs, and development projects. (RER Carried Interest Fact Sheet, Jan. 2026)
  • Restrictions on interest deductions could create additional financing challenges for real estate owners by increasing after-tax borrowing costs, reducing property values, and complicating the refinancing of maturing debt. Because debt is a fundamental source of financing for commercial real estate investment and development, the changes could also constrain capital availability and discourage new investment. (RER Policy Priorities, Tax)

Roundtable Advocacy

  • The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) has consistently opposed proposals to tax all carried interest as ordinary income, emphasizing that carried interest reflects the entrepreneurial risk and “sweat equity” contributed by general partners to real estate ventures. RER has warned that such changes could affect 2.2 million real estate partnerships and 9.7 million partners nationwide. (RER Carried Interest Fact Sheet, Jan. 2026)
  • Beyond carried interest, RER has advocated for preserving the Section 199A deduction for pass-through businesses and qualified REIT dividends, as well as the real estate exception from Section 163(j). In an October 2025 letter to Treasury and the IRS, RER urged regulators to allow real estate businesses to revisit prior Section 163(j) elections to access bonus depreciation benefits restored under the 2025 tax law. (RER Letter, Oct. 17, 2025)

RER will continue working with policymakers to oppose tax provisions that could undermine real estate investment, financing, and development, while advocating for policies that support capital formation and the stability of U.S. real estate markets.

IRS Relief Expands Real Estate’s Access to Bonus Depreciation Tax Benefit

Posted on by abigail_grenadier
IRS building in Washington, DC

The IRS and Treasury Department this week issued new guidance allowing real estate companies to withdraw prior elections that had prevented many from fully benefiting from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s (OB3 Act) restored 100% bonus depreciation provision. Revenue Procedure 2026-17 outlines how taxpayers may revoke those elections under Section 163(j), clearing the way for broader use of immediate expensing across commercial real estate. (Bloomberg, March 18)

Why It Matters

  • The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) has urged Treasury to allow real estate owners who previously elected out of strict limitations on the deductibility of business interest to withdraw or amend those elections. This would enable them to fully benefit from the OB3 Act’s restored bonus depreciation benefit. (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 6)
  • Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), an electing real property trade or business (RPTOB) is exempt from the Section 163(j) limit on business interest deductibility, but must use the alternative depreciation system to recover the cost of its investment. As a result, electing RPTOBs are ineligible for bonus depreciation on leasehold and nonresidential interior property improvements.
  • Beginning in 2022, the Section 163(j) business interest limitation tightened, and starting in 2023, bonus depreciation began to phase out. Those two changes led many real estate owners to make the RPTOB election.
  • The OB3 Act reversed both provisions by restoring the original TCJA parameters for Section 163(j) and permanently extending 100% bonus depreciation. While that was a major positive development for new real estate investment, it left existing property owners locked into irrevocable RPTOB elections made under prior law.
  • Revenue Procedure 2026-17 addresses that problem by allowing taxpayers to retroactively withdraw an RPTOB election for taxable years 2022, 2023, or 2024. If a real estate owner withdraws the election under the revenue procedure, the owner is treated as if the election had never been made.
  • This change makes 100% bonus depreciation available to a much larger share of U.S. commercial real estate, ensures that property owners are not penalized for elections made under a tax regime that no longer applies, and should support additional capital formation.
  • The revenue procedure also provides guidance on the administrative steps for withdrawing an election, partnership filing requirements, and procedures for amending returns for intervening years.

RER Advocacy

  • In an Oct. 17, 2025, letter, RER wrote to Treasury urging guidance allowing real estate businesses to amend or revoke prior RPTOB elections to ensure the OB3 Act’s restored 100 percent bonus depreciation provision supports real estate investment, job creation, and economic growth. (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 6)
  • The letter emphasized that clear implementing rules will help bonus depreciation “facilitate the modernization and repurposing of real estate assets,” including underutilized offices, shopping centers, hotels, and mixed-use properties. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 17)

Treasury’s action addresses a key transition issue created by the new law. It helps ensure that restored bonus depreciation can work as intended across a broader share of commercial real estate investment.