Tag: Tax Policy

House Passes Build Back Better Act, Roundtable Urges Improvements to Green Energy Tax Provisions

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Capitol reflective glass morning

House Democrats passed their “sweeping” reconciliation package of tax, health care, education, and climate initiatives Friday morning, a step that advances a “centerpiece” of President Biden’s domestic agenda and represents “the most significant restructuring of the [social] safety net in decades.” (Politico, Nov. 19)

President Biden lauded the House’s action in a statement released by the White House this morning.

Partisan Bill Advances to the Senate

  • All Democrats (except one) supported the $1.7 trillion Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376), after months of negotiations between Progressives and Moderates debating the breadth of the measure and scaling back its original price tag north of $3.5 trillion. (Roundtable Weekly, Nov. 5) No House Republican voted for the bill.
  • Today’s party-line vote took place after the Congressional Budget Office submitted a cost analysis that satisfied the requirements of a crucial group of Democratic Moderates needed to approve the legislative package. (CBO, Nov. 18 and text of the budget reconciliation bill.)
  • The legislation now moves to the Senate where it will face additional scrutiny and could be reduced further in scope. If the Senate ultimately passes the BBB Act in a manner that changes the House-approved version, the bill would need to go back to the House for another vote before it reaches President Biden’s desk.
  • Passage of the BBB Act follows on the heels of the enactment of the bipartisan bill to upgrade the nation’s transportation, water, grid, broadband, and other “physical” infrastructure. President Biden signed the $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act into law on Monday. (Washington Post, Nov. 15). The Roundtable has strongly supported bipartisan investments to modernize the nation’s physical infrastructure. (Roundtable Weekly, Nov. 12).

Progress on CRE Tax Issues

San Francisco buildings

  • Relative to President Biden’s budget and the initial bill passed by the Ways and Means Committee, the House-passed BBB Act reflects continued progress on a number of tax issues important to real estate and prioritized by The Real Estate Roundtable. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 29) Critically, the current bill does not:     
     
    • Limit like-kind exchanges (sec. 1031),
    • Increase the capital gains tax rate,
    • Restrict the 20% pass-through business income deduction (sec. 199A),
    • Tax unrealized gains at death or repeal of the step-up in basis of assets,
    • Change the tax treatment of carried interest, and
    • Restrict estate tax valuation discounts.

Roundtable Recommends Changes to Clean Energy Tax Provisions

Alternative Energy source CRE

  • The BBB Act’s suite of clean energy tax credits and incentives comprise the legislation’s biggest measures to fight climate change. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 29)
  • The Roundtable sent a letter to Congressional tax writers on Tuesday detailing five recommendations that aim to improve green energy tax provisions affecting real estate. The Roundtable’s letter urged changes to the BBB Act that would further the objectives to slash GHG emissions and make rapid progress toward a “net zero” economy by mid-century. (Roundtable letter, Nov. 16)
  • The letter’s recommendations, listed below, would increase and scale deployment of low- and zero-carbon technology in the nation’s commercial and multifamily building infrastructure.
  1. Clarify that “thermal energy storage systems” are eligible for incentives under the Section 48 Investment Tax Credit.
  2. Further revise the 30C tax credit to support EV chargers in the non-public, but widely used, parking lots and garages that serve America’s residential and business tenants who seek to conveniently “charge-up” while at home or at work.
  3. Better align the BBB Act with the Biden Administration’s long-term climate strategy – by providing accelerated depreciation and other incentives for heat pumps and other components that “electrify” commercial and multifamily buildings.
  4. Induce more “retrofits” of aging buildings by allowing taxpayers to claim the 179D deduction in the year high-efficiency equipment is placed in service.
  5. The inclusion of Davis-Bacon and apprenticeship hiring will seriously undermine climate goals – because the high costs to comply with these labor standards will more than offset the BBB Act’s “bonus rates” for clean energy projects. Congress should not hinge the “bonus rates” on unrelated labor issues that fail to accelerate achievement of GHG reduction strategies.

Next: The Senate in December

U.S. Capitol evening

  • The Senate will take up the House BBB bill in December. Democrats will need the support of moderate Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) to pass BBB legislation in the evenly divided upper chamber using budget reconciliation rules. However, Manchin recently stated he may withhold his support of the bill until next year due to rising inflation rates. (Newsweek, Nov. 16 and Axios, Nov. 10)
  • Additionally, House lawmakers included six pages of technical changes in their BBB bill that could help it pass the scrutiny of the Senate Parliamentarian, who can remove certain House provisions if she determines they are incompatible with Senate rules.

Congress is scheduled to return from the Thanksgiving break on Dec. 3. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen this week warned that if lawmakers do not take action to lift the legal debt ceiling by Dec. 15, they will risk a government default on its debt obligations. (Wall Street Journal, Nov. 16) 

#  #  # 

Democrats’ Revised Tax Plan Includes Changes and Improvements Important to Real Estate and Other Pass-through Businesses

Posted on by Trey Jackson

DC landscape

This week’s frenzy of infrastructure negotiations in Washington was capped off by the White House’s release yesterday of a pared down, $1.75 trillion framework agreement on “human” infrastructure legislation, which trimmed back potential tax increases on commercial real estate and other pass-through businesses. (CQ, Oct. 30 and Tax Notes, Oct. 29) 

Dynamic Negotiations 

  • By introducing revised legislation – the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376) – Democratic leaders hoped to create momentum for a vote on the separate, bipartisan “physical” infrastructure bill. Their effort was unable to secure the necessary support for an immediate vote from House progressives. (Section-by-section bill summary and Washington Post, Oct. 29)
  • Policymakers did pass a short-term extension of surface transportation programs until Dec. 3 – the same day that funding for the government will run out and within the time frame for addressing the current debt ceiling. (Punchbowl News, and BGov, Oct. 30)
  • Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer commented on the evolving infrastructure legislative developments in an interview this week with American City Business Journals. DeBoer noted that as the bill’s cost has come down, policymakers have eliminated many proposed tax increases.
  • “We very much want to see the physical bipartisan infrastructure bill pass. It has been tied in the House to the larger human infrastructure bill, and that legislation is slowly winding its way to the finish line. As the larger bill was put forward, we were concerned about some provisions that we felt might target real estate activities and real estate investment. We tracked all of these various proposals such as mark-to-market and wealth taxes. We’re continuing to monitor developments and ensure that nothing comes up without proper vetting or full understanding of how it would impact CRE,” DeBoer said. 

What It Means for CRE 

Marcus and Millichap Oct 21 2021 tax webinar

  • The revised reconciliation bill reflects continued progress on a number of tax issues important to real estate and prioritized by The Real Estate Roundtable. Critically, the current bill includes:     
     
    • No limitations on like-kind exchanges (sec. 1031),
    • No increase in the capital gains tax rate,
    • No restrictions on the 20% pass-through business income deduction (sec. 199A),
    • No taxation of unrealized gains at death or repeal of the step-up in basis of assets,
    • No changes in the tax treatment of carried interest, and
    • No restrictions on estate tax valuation discounts. 
  • Additionally, the revised legislation excludes a complex mark-to-market regime to tax the unrealized gains of billionaires, new tax burdens on grantor trusts, and a provision that would have prohibited IRA investment in many non-listed REITS. 

Key Tax Revenue Provisions 

Tax issues grid choice image

  • In addition to provisions aimed at corporate and international business activities, tax provisions in the framework agreement include:
     
    • Expansion of the 3.8% net investment income tax to cover a much broader range of income – such as capital gains and rents – earned by both active business owners (such as real estate professionals), S corp. shareholders, and limited partners.

    • A new proposal to impose a 5% surtax on a taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income (AGI) over $10M and an additional 3% surtax tax on modified AGI over $25 million.

    • Restrictions on taxpayers’ ability to deduct more than $250K (individual) or $500K (married couple) of losses incurred in an active trade or business from their portfolio income or wages.

    • Modifications to the portfolio interest exception that exempts interest earned on certain U.S. debt obligations from a withholding tax on outbound interest payments. The exception is sometimes used by foreign institutions when investing in US real estate.

    • Clarification that limitation on interest deductibility (sec. 163(j)) applies at the partner or shareholder level, not the entity level.

    • Clean Energy tax provisions affecting real estate are covered in the Roundtable Weekly story below. 

Dropped Tax Incentives 

  • As the cost of the bill came down, certain tax incentives were eliminated from the package: expansion of the low-income housing tax credit and the credit for rehabilitating historic structures, creation of a new tax credit for home construction in low-income communities for low-income buyers, and new infrastructure tax credit bonds and related infrastructure financing provisions. 

Legislative changes to the bill could occur next week on crucial issues such as the SALT deduction, but the timing of action on a final agreement remains uncertain. (Bloomberg, Oct. 29) 

#  #  #

Democrats Struggle to Reach Agreement on “Social Infrastructure” Package as Roundtable’s DeBoer Addresses Real Estate Tax Issues in Play

Posted on by Trey Jackson

image - U.S. Capitol blue sky

Democrats this week struggled to reach agreement on cutting the cost of President Biden’s multitrillion “social infrastructure” proposal as Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) opposed any increase in marginal rates for businesses, high-income individuals or capital gains to pay for the package. Democrats aim to pass both the “human” and “physical’ infrastructure packages under a budget reconciliation process that requires approval of all 50 Democrats in the evenly divided Senate. (Wall Street Journal, Oct. 20) 

CRE Impact 

Jeffrey DeBoer, Real Estate Roundtable President and CEP

  • Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer (above) yesterday addressed the fluid nature of the reconciliation bill negotiations during a Marcus and Millichap tax policy webinar. The webcast is available here, but you must be registered to access the discussion.
  • DeBoer noted that the narrow voting margins in both the Senate and House have created an environment where it is difficult for various factions in Congress to reach consensus. “What we have here is a clash between expectations and reality,” DeBoer said.
  • He added that the current policy disputes among lawmakers adds uncertainty to the potential outcome. “Could negative tax provisions affecting real estate be put back on the table? Absolutely. What also worries me is that other proposals that we don’t know about yet may suddenly be considered.” (Registration required to view the Marcus & Millichap webcast)
  • The House Ways and Means Committee voted in September to advance legislation that would finance Biden’s social infrastructure initiatives with a $2.1 trillion tax increase focused on high-income individuals and corporations. The House legislation excluded several tax proposals put forward by the Biden administration and Senate lawmakers that would increase the tax burden on real estate. (Roundtable Weekly, Sept. 17)
  • The Washington Post today reported that a new “Billionaire Income Tax” proposal from Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) would “aim to raise hundreds of billions of dollars from the fortunes of America’s roughly 700 billionaires” by applying a tax to those individuals earning over $100 million in income three years in a row. Taxes would be imposed on the increased value of assets such as stocks on an annual basis, regardless of whether those assets are sold. Billionaires would also be able to take deductions for the annual loss in value of those assets. (Washington Post, Oct 22)
  • Additional tax issues affecting CRE are profiled in The Roundtable’s summary on Real Estate Tax Issues and Budget Reconciliation Legislation.   

Tax Uncertainty 

Kyrsten Sinema

  • The Senate has not acted on any revenue-raising proposals to support President Biden’s original $3.5 trillion infrastructure package. Policymakers are now aiming to pare down the overall reconciliation bill cost to approximately $2 trillion before finalizing measures to pay for the package.
  • Sen. Sinema (above) yesterday spoke with House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) in an effort to break the impasse on how to fund certain infrastructure spending priorities in a scaled-down package. Neal said he is optimistic a deal will be reached. “I did point out that it’s the ninth inning. I mean, when are you going to vet these issues?” Neal said. (The Hill, Oct. 21)
  • The current reconciliation bill in the House would raise the top marginal income tax rate on many pass-through business owners from 29.6% today to 46.4% (a 57% increase). The Roundtable believes this level of increase on pass-through businesses was unintended by Members of Congress and could undercut the bill’s own objectives. 

As negotiations continue among policymakers on a reduced topline number for the social infrastructure package – and the specific programs it would support within a multi-trillion reconciliation bill – The Roundtable continues to urge lawmakers to ensure that any tax changes within a final agreement treats pass-through businesses fairly and equitably. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 1 and Oct. 15) 

#  #  # 

Roundtable Encouraging Congress to Ensure Fair Treatment of Pass-Through Businesses in Final Reconciliation Bill

Posted on by Trey Jackson
House Ways and Means Committee graphic


As negotiations continue on a multi-trillion reconciliation bill, The Real Estate Roundtable is urging lawmakers to ensure that any final agreement on tax changes treats pass-through businesses fairly and equitably.

Why It Matters

  • The reconciliation bill approved by the House Ways and Means Committee excluded several real estate-related tax proposals put forward by the Biden administration that could cause unnecessary harm to job creation, real estate values, and local communities that rely on property tax revenue. These proposals included restrictions on like-kind exchanges, repealing the step-up in basis of assets at death, and tax parity between ordinary income and capital gains. (Roundtable Weekly, Sept. 17)
  • At the same time, through the combination of several, independent tax changes aimed at upper-income taxpayers, the current reconciliation bill in the House would raise the top marginal income tax rate on many pass-through business owners from 29.6% today to 46.4% (a 57% increase). 

Contact Congress

  • The Roundtable believes this level of increase on pass-through businesses was unintended by Members of Congress and could undercut the bill’s own objectives of stimulating job growth, improving housing availability, and promoting investment in economically struggling communities, among other priorities.
  • See The Roundtable’s detailed summary on “Pass-Through Businesses and the Reconciliation Bill.” 

  • “Small and closely held businesses are the principal drivers of job growth and entrepreneurial activity in our economy.  The increase in the tax burden on pass-through businesses is disproportionately large relative to the tax changes for large, multinational corporations. The bill would create a historically high differential in the tax rates between pass-throughs and C corps and could put pass-through businesses at a competitive disadvantage in the economy. We do not believe this was the intent of the bill drafters,” said Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer.  

  • The dramatic increase in the pass-through tax rate results in part from capping the 20% deduction on pass-through business income (section 199A).  Other changes include increasing the top tax rate on ordinary income from 37 to 39.6 percent, expanding the scope of the 3.8% tax on net investment income, and imposing a 3% surtax on incomes above $5 million.
     
  • As currently proposed, the rate differential between pass-throughs (46.4%) and C corps (26.5%) would be 20 percentage points, more than twice the level of any period over the last four decades. Real estate partnerships constitute half of the four million partnerships in the United States.

Roundtable members and others are encouraged to reach out to their Representatives and contact their Senators to urge them to preserve the 20% deduction for pass-through business income (section 199A), which is directly tied to hiring workers and investing in capital equipment and property.  Modest adjustments in the legislation would ensure that pass-through businesses will continue contributing to economic growth, innovation, and job creation. Additional information and talking points can be found here.  

#  #  #

House Ways and Means Committee Advances Historic Legislation with Safety Net Expansion and $2.1 Trillion in Tax Increases

Posted on by Trey Jackson

House Ways and Means Committee graphic

The House Ways and Means Committee voted to advance legislation that would expand benefits for low-income families, invest in affordable housing and other Democratic priorities, and finance the initiatives with a $2.1 trillion tax increase that primarily falls on high-income individuals, pass-through businesses, and corporations. The legislation excludes several tax proposals put forward by the Biden administration and Senate lawmakers that would increase the tax burden on real estate. (Ways and Means news release and markup resources) 

  • Real Estate Roundtable President Jeffrey DeBoer stated, “The House Ways and Means Committee’s proposals include significant tax increases on corporations and income received by upper income taxpayers, and not on business activities like real estate.  Even so, the combined tax hikes on income received from pass-through entities could threaten job creation and business expansion. As the bill moves forward, we encourage Congress to review the suggested tax hikes, particularly those on pass-through businesses, and work to ensure that unnecessary and unintended damage is not done to the economy. Substantial commercial real estate activities are conducted by pass-through entities and these activities create jobs, support retirement savings, and boost tax revenue for critical public services provided by local governments. The Roundtable is encouraged, yet cautious, at this still relatively early stage of the legislative process. Further changes may be on the horizon, both positive and negative.” 
  • Tax issues affecting CRE are summarized in The Roundtable’s summary on Real Estate Tax Issues and Budget Reconciliation Legislation. The real estate tax issues addressed by the W&M Committee include: 

Ways and Means markup


Real Property Like-Kind Exchanges (Section 1031) 

  • The bill wisely preserves taxpayers’ ability to defer capital gain when exchanging real property for another property of like kind. 

Step-Up in Basis and Taxation of Gains at Death 

  • The bill preserves the step-up in basis that applies to appreciated gain when real estate is transferred from a decedent to an heir. The bill does not impose capital gains tax on appreciated real estate when transferred by a decedent or donor.

Capital Gains 

  • The bill increases the maximum capital gains rate from 20% to 25%. The 3.8% investment tax is maintained and extended to all taxpayers, thus making the effective capital gain tax rate 28.8%. The President’s budget proposed increasing the capital gains rate to 39.6% to create parity between the tax rate on ordinary income and capital gains.

Real Estate Carried Interest 

  • The bill generally extends from 3 years to 5 years the holding period for partnership gains attributable to a profits interest to qualify for the long-term capital gains rate. However, the bill preserves the shorter 3-year holding period for capital gain related to a real property trade or business.  The President’s budget proposed converting all carried interest income derived from a profits interest in a real estate partnership to ordinary income.

Pass-Through Business Income Deduction (Section 199A) 

  • The bill limits the maximum deduction available for pass-through business income under section 199A to no more than $400,000 for an individual and $500,000 in the case of a joint return ($2.5 million).

Net Investment Income Tax 

  • The bill would apply the 3.8% net investment income tax to income derived from a trade or business, capital gain, dividends, interest, and rental income regardless of whether the taxpayer is active or passive in the activity.

Other Tax Issues 

  • Other tax issues addressed by the committee included affordable housing, infrastructure financing, grantor trusts, deductibility of active losses and REIT constructive ownership rules. These issues are also summarized in The Roundtable’s summary on Real Estate Tax Issues and Budget Reconciliation Legislation.
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is expected to address a provision affecting the $10,000 limit on state and local deductions (SALT) before a final bill is assembled for a floor vote. (CNBC, Sept. 15)
  • The committee’s proposals on clean energy incentives are detailed in the Roundtable Weekly story below on energy policy. 

The House is expected to try to resolve major differences between their final bill and the Senate’s version before voting on the package. Senate Majority Leader Chuck. Schumer (D-NY) has not set a formal deadline for the Senate to complete its work but he said Tuesday “there’s going to be a lot of intense discussions and negotiations over the next few weeks.” (RollCall, Sept. 14) 

#  #  # 

House Ways & Means Scheduled to Mark-up Revenue Measures Next Week

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Ways and Means Committee wiki

The Real Estate Roundtable continued to weigh in with lawmakers with concerns on a number of Biden administration tax proposals as the House Ways and Means Committee prepared to mark-up tax measures early next week that may potentially affect commercial real estate. 

Ways & Means Timeline 

  • Congressional committees are aiming to complete work by Sept. 15 on various portions of the massive infrastructure package, which Democrats will consider under “reconciliation” budget rules that require a simple majority to pass in the narrowly divided Congress. (Wall Street Journal, August 24)
  • Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) expects to release details on his revenue proposals over the weekend. The top ordinary tax rate and the corporate tax rate are expected to be a key focus of the committee’s deliberations. (The Hill, Sept. 9)
  • Ways and Means member Stephanie Murphy (D-FL) stated this week she will vote against the committee’s measures unless more time is available to review the proposals. (CNN, Sept. 9)
  • Rep. Murphy, a moderate, said she supports the use of reconciliation to enact Democrats’ economic priorities, but at this stage, she said, “I have no choice but to vote ‘no’ on each subtitle and on final passage,” she said.  (Roll Call, Sept. 9)
  • “I don’t know how much we’re spending, how much we’re raising, how we’re spending some of the money and how we’re raising any of the money,” she said. (Murphy statement, YouTube, Sept. 9) 

Revenue Raisers 

Tax issues grid choice image

President Biden’s tax proposals that may be considered by Ways & Means include: 

Like-kind Exchanges (Section 1031) 

  • A coalition of 27 business organizations, including The Real Estate Roundtable, wrote to congressional tax-writing committee leadership on Sept. 7 about how Biden’s proposed legislative restrictions on like-kind exchanges, if enacted, would undermine the economic recovery while causing unintended and unnecessary risks to the strength and stability of U.S. real estate.
  • The coalition’s letter details how like-kind exchanges under section 1031 support jobs and investment; the health of U.S. commercial real estate and real estate markets; and the preservation of family-owned farms, ranches, and forestland.
  • Tax Notes on August 9 published an article entitled “The Tax Policy Case for Section 1031” by Roundtable Tax Policy Advisory Committee Member Don Susswein (Principal, RSM US LLP), Roundtable Senior Vice President and Counsel Ryan McCormick and Kyle Brown (Senior Manager, RSM).
  • The article addresses how like-kind exchanges increase net investment, boost state and local tax revenue, stimulate capital expenditures which leads to job growth, reduce leverage and financial risk, lower rents for households, and support healthy property values.  The article also shows how use of section 1031 also creates a ladder of economic opportunity for minority-, veteran-, and women-owned businesses and cash-poor entrepreneurs who may lack access to traditional sources of financing.
  • Advertising messages on the need to preserve section 1031 will begin running on Sept. 13 in Politico’s Morning Money. 

Pass-Through Business Income Deduction (Section 199A) 

  • More than 120 business trade associations, including The Roundtable, are part of the broad-based Main St. Employers coalition, which wrote to Ways and Means Chairman Neal on Sept. 8 about new Biden tax proposals affecting individually- and family-owned businesses. (Coalition letter)
  • The letter states, “Proposals to raise rates on pass-throughs and C corporations, cap the Section 199A deduction, increase the capital gains tax, and impose capital gains at death would raise taxes on Main Street businesses when they operate, when they are sold, and when they are passed on to the next generation.” 

Step-up in Basis and Taxation of Gains at Death 

  • A Sept. 9 letter to congressional tax-writing committee leadership from a large multi-industry trade association coalition that includes The Roundtable strongly opposed Biden administration proposals to death a taxable event for inherited assets and eliminating stepped-up basis.
  • The Family Business Estate Tax Coalition letter also cited a recent EY report that showed if stepped-up basis were repealed via carryover basis, 40,000 jobs would be lost every year in the first 10 years after enactment and GDP would decrease by $50 billion over 10 years.
  • The National Association of Realtors also weighed in on the administration’s tax proposals above in a Sept. 7 letter to leaders of the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees. The letter emphasized how these the proposals could negatively impact the health of the commercial real estate market and limit the production of much-needed affordable rental housing and result in higher rent costs.
  • Policymakers are also expected to address tax issues such as raising the capital gains rate, the 3.8% net investment income tax, and carried interest, as well as tax incentives for important priorities like affordable housing and energy efficiency.  

Roundtable members are encouraged to contact the Ways and Means Committee directly about the Biden tax proposals. The Roundtable and its coalition partners expect this fall will be a critical time for decisions on national tax policy affecting CRE. 

#  #  # 

Roundtable Raises Concerns about New and Complex Senate Proposal to Raise Taxes on Real Estate Partnerships

Posted on by Trey Jackson

Jeffrey DeBoer testimony on behalf of The Real Estate Roundtable

Real Estate Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer expressed strong concerns following the Sept. 10 release of Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden’s (D-OR) draft legislation to restructure pass-through tax rules and raise $172 billion in additional tax revenue from the country’s 4 million partnerships and LLCs. (Wyden Draft, Proposal Overview and Summary) 

Possible Economic Disruption 

  • DeBoer stated, “Partnerships are used to bring parties together to create and grow businesses that propel job creation, new investment, and productive economic activity. Partnerships contribute immensely to the culture of dynamic entrepreneurship and risk-taking that is missing in many parts of the world where business activity is dominated by large, public corporations. In this current environment, Congress should be working on ways to encourage and strengthen partnerships, not cut their knees out from under them.”
  • Over the last several decades, partnerships have grown to become a dominant form of business organization in the United States, accounting for $8.7 trillion in annual business receipts and $34.3 trillion in total assets, according to the IRS.
  • Senator Wyden’s proposal, if enacted, could have enormous and unanticipated consequences for U.S. real estate, capital investment, and economic activity. Real estate, rental, and leasing businesses represent more than half (50.4 percent) of all partnerships.
  • “The Chairman’s proposal is big, comprehensive, and not yet vetted in any meaningful way. Partnership taxation is a complicated area of the law that has evolved over decades. The proposals would apply retroactively to economic arrangements negotiated years ago. Past experience with retroactive changes to partnership tax law, in 1986, generated huge and damaging economic disruption, including massive bankruptcies, stress on all lenders, and the end of the saving and loan industry. We don’t need that kind of rash policy action again,” DeBoer added.  

Details Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR)

  • Proposals in Chairman Wyden’s discussion draft that would have a significant impact on real estate partnerships include: 
  • Modifying the rules for determining whether a partner has recourse debt with respect to partnership property. The provision would require all partnership debt to be allocated in accordance with partnership profits except where a partner is the lender (sec. 752).
  • Restricting the methods available for allocating the tax attributes of contributed property among the partners in a partnership by mandating the remedial method under section 704(c).

  • In the case of property contributed to a partnership with built-in gain, requiring gain recognition by the contributing partner if the property is subsequently distributed to another partner, even if the distribution occurs after 7 years (e.g., the “mixing bowl” rule that currently applies for 7 years would apply forever).
  • Mandating partnership basis adjustments that relate to disparities between inside and outside partnership basis that arise due to partnership distributions or transfers of partnership interests. These basis adjustments are currently elective under section 754 and mandated in only certain substantial cases in sections 734 and 743.
  • Other provisions in the draft legislation would: eliminate substantial economic effect as a basis for partnership allocations and instead require partnerships to make allocations in all instances based on the “partners’ interests in the partnership” standard (except in certain “abusive” situations involving related partners). Among the other proposed changes, the bill would also subject publicly traded partnerships that earn qualifying passive income to corporate-level taxation. 

The Wyden proposal comes as Congressional Democrats are seeking new revenue sources to finance their ambitious $3.5 trillion human capital initiative. 

 #  #  # 

Tax Proposals Under Scrutiny as Timetable Moves Up for Mammoth Reconciliation Bill

Posted on by Trey Jackson

The unanticipated commitment by Speaker Pelosi to allow a stand-alone vote on the bipartisan Senate infrastructure bill no later than September 27 has scrambled the Congressional calendar and put increased attention and focus on the potential for major tax changes.

Why It Matters

  • House Leaders are urging committees, including the powerful Ways and Means Committee, to complete their work on the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill by September 15.  Ways and Means Chairman Richie Neal has indicated a formal mark-up could start the week of Sept. 6 and continue 4-5 days.  (E&E Daily, Aug. 25)
  • Accelerating the consideration of the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill may allow its supporters and advocates to retain political momentum for the massive package of social safety net, environmental, tax, and other policies—momentum that could be lost once the infrastructure bill is sent to the President.
  • The shortened timetable, however, puts pressure on lawmakers who are considering complex changes to the tax code that would normally require hearings, extended debate, and substantial vetting.  

Industry Concerns

  • The Real Estate Roundtable has raised concerns regarding a number of proposals in the President’s plan that would raise the tax burden on capital formation, undermine property values and the functioning of real estate markets, and harm the industry’s ability to create jobs and support local communities through property tax revenue.  These proposals include restrictions on like-kind exchanges, an elimination of the reduced tax rate on capital gains, and the taxation of unrealized gains at death.
  • On Tuesday, the accounting industry expressed strong concerns with the President’s proposed changes to capital income. The letter noted that, “[t]he taxation of the capital gains on gift or death in many cases would be the third time that the gain is taxed.”  Imposing immediate tax on transfers by gift or death is an unreasonable requirement when the transfers are non-liquid assets such as real estate, business interests, etc., because it may require the forced liquidation of some or all of the assets transferred,” they continued.    
  • Last Friday, the Tax Foundation challenged the Administration’s claim that their tax proposals would spare 97 percent of small businesses.  The organization analyzed the most recent IRS data and concluded the President’s proposals would reach more than half of pass-through business income (because 54% of pass-through income is earned by taxpayers making more than $500,000).
  • At the same time, lawmakers are mobilizing to ensure that the $3.5 trillion bill includes priorities such as increased investment in affordable housing.  On Thursday, 111 House Democrats led by Reps. Suzan DelBene (D-WA) and Don Beyer (D-VA) wrote to Speaker Pelosi urging that the legislation include a significant expansion of the low-income housing tax credit.

Contact Congress

Senate Democrats Pass Budget Resolution that Would Authorize $3.5 trillion “Human Infrastructure” Bill with Large Tax Increases

Posted on by Trey Jackson

DC monuments night

Senate Democrats voted August 11 to advance a $3.5 trillion “human infrastructure” budget resolution, which allows development of legislation that could pass later this year without any Republican support. The budget blueprint passed on a party-line vote of 50-49 the day after the Senate passed a $1.2 trillion “physical infrastructure” bill on a bipartisan basis. (BGov, Aug 11 and Roundtable Weekly, story above) 

Why It Matters 

  • The Senate budget resolution supports President Biden’s wide-ranging domestic priorities that aim to expand the federal social safety net and combat climate change. (New York Times and The Hill, Aug. 11)
  • The sprawling human infrastructure proposal would be partially financed by raising taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals – and potentially include a variety of tax increases affecting commercial real estate.
  • The Senate measure also provided instructions for various committees to craft bills under “reconciliation” budget rules. If approved by the Senate Parliamentarian, the committees’ work would be combined into final legislation that could pass on a majority vote, thereby bypassing a Republican filibuster. (Senate Democratic Memorandum, Aug. 9)
  • The House announced this week that it will return early from summer recess on Aug. 23 to consider the budget resolution. (Associated Press and CQ, Aug. 11)
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) reiterated on Aug. 11 that until the Senate finishes and passes the massive reconciliation bill, the House will not vote on the physical infrastructure legislation. Other Members of the Democratic Caucus, including Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, have called on Congressional Leaders to decouple the measures and send the bipartisan infrastructure bill to the President without delay. (Politico, Aug. 11 and The Hill, Aug. 11) 

Taxes & CRE  

Philadelphia, PA skyline

Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer commented on the Senate’s $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill and the tax proposals under consideration.  

  • DeBoer on Aug 11 stated, “This [reconciliation] package may be financed with a variety of tax increases affecting step-up in basis, like-kind exchanges, carried interest and capital gains that would act as a cumulative drag on investment at the exact time when sectors of the economy need incentives to recover from the pandemic. The Roundtable urges Senate and House policymakers to be very cautious as they proceed on the reconciliation bill – so that one-step forward with the physical infrastructure bill is not met with two-steps backward from tax increases.” (Roundtable statement, Aug. 11)
  • The Roundtable this week produced a summary of budget reconciliation tax issues that could directly impact commercial real estate, including: 
    • Like-Kind Exchanges
    • Capital Gains
    • Pass-through Business Income
    • Step-up in Basis and Taxation of Gains at Death
    • Carried Interest
    • Energy Efficiency Incentives
    • Affordable Housing Incentives 

Roundtable Infrastructure Town Hall 

Roundtable Infrastructure Town Hall - image capture

  • The Roundtable held an all-member Infrastructure Town Hall on Aug. 12 to discuss the Senate reconciliation measure and what it means for commercial real estate. Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY), a member of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, center in photo,  joined Roundtable Chair John Fish, top right, Jeffrey DeBoer, top left, and other Roundtable staff for the Town Hall discussion.

The congressional debate on infrastructure is expected to extend into the fall, when policymakers face multiple other deadlines that converge on Sept. 30 – government funding for FY2022, reauthorization of funding for surface transportation programs, and reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program. The Roundtable is scheduled to discuss all these issues at its Fall Meeting on Oct. 5 in Washington, DC (Roundtable-level members only). 

#  #  #

House Republicans Urge Biden Administration to Preserve Like-Kind Exchanges

Posted on by Trey Jackson

A group of 88 House Republicans, led by Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-IA), above, sent a letter to President Joe Biden on Aug. 3 urging him “not to damage the livelihood of farmers everywhere by repealing or changing like-kind exchanges.” ( Coalition letter and Feenstra news release)

Agriculture Sector Impact 

  • Like-kind exchanges (LKEs) allow real estate, farming, and other businesses to defer capital gain when exchanging real property used in a trade or business for property of a like kind. Like-kind exchanges also help businesses to grow organically, with less debt, by reinvesting gains on a tax-deferred basis in new and productive assets.
  • President Biden has proposed restricting the use of LKEs by limiting deferred gain in any one year to no more than $500,000 for single taxpayers and $1 million for married taxpayers. (Treasury Department’s Summary of Revenue Proposals, “Green Book” budget documents, and Roundtable Weekly, April 30)
  • The coalition of House policymakers emphasized in their Aug. 3 letter how LKEs allow farmers and other small business owners to improve their operations and invest in better income-producing properties. The letter noted that four out of five individuals who utilize these tax deferments are qualified as small investors by the IRS.
  • The letter stated, “For the agricultural community, a cap on like-kind exchanges would limit farmers’ ability to improve their operations through combining acreage, purchasing more productive land, and mitigating environmental impacts. Further, capping like­kind exchanges could make it more difficult to restructure businesses so that young or beginning farmers can join operations. Retiring farmers could be prevented from using like-kind exchanges to exchange their farm or ranch for other real estate, allowing for the next generation to take over, without depleting their life savings.”
  • The 88 policymakers also commented how the negative impact of the administration’s LKE proposal would radiate outward from individual farm owners and agricultural investors into the larger agricultural sector and the national economy at large. 

Roundtable’s Strong Support for LKEs 

  • On May 27, a broad business coalition that included The Real Estate Roundtable held a virtual briefing for members of Congress and their staff on the longstanding economic importance of LKEs – and detailed the potential negative unintended consequences of limiting section 1031. (Roundtable Weekly, May 28)
  • The briefing, moderated by Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer, included expert speakers and featured recent research into the macro-economic impact of LKEs. (See “The Tax and Economic Impacts of Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges in Real Estate” by Professor Milena Petrova and Dr. David Ling)
  • On May 18, The Roundtable and others submitted detailed comments to the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means Committees on like-kind exchanges and other pending tax issues. (Roundtable Weekly, May 21).  Additionally, in March, The Roundtable and 30 national real estate, housing, environmental, farming, ranching, and forestry organizations wrote to key policymakers to underscore the vital importance of real estate like-kind exchanges. (Roundtable Weekly, March 19)

The coalition “1031 Builds America” provides an online method for stakeholders to share their experiences with LKEs with members of Congress, and urge them to preserve Section 1031. 

#  #  #