News Type: Roundtable Weekly

Senate Takes Up House Housing Bill as White House Seeks Limits on Institutional Investors

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

President Donald Trump used his State of the Union address on Tuesday to renew his call for Congress to codify limits on large institutional investors buying additional single-family homes, as lawmakers work to merge bipartisan House and Senate housing packages into a final deal set for a vote next week. (Axios | PoliticoPro, Feb. 25)

State of Play

  • “We want homes for people, not for corporations,” Trump said as he urged Congress to make the policy permanent. (PoliticoPro, Feb. 25)
  • House Republicans met this week with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as lawmakers explore legislative language tied to the housing package. Trump and Bessent have said that any final legislation must include language banning large investors from purchasing single-family. (Reuters, Feb. 19 | PoliticoPro, Feb. 26)
  • Some lawmakers and analysts have argued that investor bans do not address the core affordability driver—a persistent housing supply shortage. Goldman Sachs estimates the U.S. would need to build up to 4 million additional homes beyond the normal pace to reduce the deficit. (CBSNews, Feb. 25 |Washington Examiner, Feb. 26)

What’s Next: Bipartisan Housing Bill Vote

  • Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) filed cloture Thursday on the House-passed  Housing for the 21st Century Act (H.R. 6644), setting up a Monday vote on the motion to proceed as leadership uses the House bill as the vehicle for a version of the Senate Banking Committee’s ROAD to Housing Act. (PoliticoPro, Feb. 26 |Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 13)
  • The House passed the bipartisan bill earlier this month with broad support, and the Senate advanced its bill in October. The two sides are now negotiating a final package. (PoliticoPro, Feb. 26 | Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 17)
  • Senate aides said the Senate package could include some provisions from the House’s bill, including measures to expand manufactured and affordable housing and protect borrowers. The Senate measure wouldn’t include the House version’s community banking provisions. (PoliticoPro, Feb. 26)
  • House Financial Services Chair French Hill (R-AR) welcomed Majority Leader Thune’s move but urged a final product that reflects “shared priorities of the House, Senate, and White House,” as the administration continues to press for some form of large-investor purchase restriction to be included in any final bipartisan housing deal. (Press Release, Feb. 26)

White House Proposal

  • In a memo sent to lawmakers last week, the administration proposed banning institutional investors who own more than 100 single-family homes from buying any new ones. (CNBC, Feb. 24)
  • The proposal would continue to allow build-to-rent developments, where investors construct new single-family homes specifically for rental use. (WSJ, Feb. 26)
  • Government entities and community land trusts would be exempt altogether, and the Treasury Department would retain authority to approve other transactions deemed to expand homeownership opportunities, giving regulators flexibility to avoid unintended consequences for buyers and renters.
  • Treasury’s forthcoming definitions of “large institutional investor” and “single-family home” are expected to shape scope and compliance, including what property types are captured and how thresholds are applied. (GlobeSt., Feb 26)
  • The ban would apply only to future purchases—without forcing investors to sell existing holdings—and would take effect 180 days after enactment. (CoStar, Feb. 20)

By the Numbers

  • A recent American Action Forum analysis found that large institutional investors have expanded the much-needed supply of rental homes, improved housing quality, and added liquidity in under supplied markets. (AAF Study, Feb. 12)
  • A Chandan Economics review of Census Bureau data finds individual investors—not institutions—own the largest share of U.S. single-family rentals (SFRs). The analysis draws on the Census Bureau’s 2024 Rental Housing Finance Survey (data collected June-November 2024), a comprehensive snapshot of rental-property mortgage financing. (Chandan Economics, Feb. 19 |GlobeSt., Feb. 25)

RER Advocacy

  • The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) has consistently emphasized that expanding housing supply is the most effective path to improving affordability, as research shows affordability pressures are driven primarily by supply shortages, construction costs, and mortgage rates—not institutional ownership levels. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16)
  • RER President & CEO Jeffrey DeBoer said, “Evidence shows that policy attacks on institutional investment in housing or other real estate are misguided.  Institutional investors actually expand the supply of rental homes, thus driving down rents. Their investments enable financially constrained families to move into neighborhoods that previously had few rental units, and these investments tend to improve the quality of the existing housing stock. While politically popular, restricting capital into housing will not address the housing problem.  Instead, policy should, as the bulk of the House and Senate bills do, intensely focus on expanding the supply of housing.”
  • In a Feb. 10 comment letter to House Financial Services Committee leadership, RER and national real estate trade groups cautioned against limiting institutional capital in the housing market, including SFR assets. (Comment Letter, Feb. 10 | Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 13)

New Senate Legislation Introduced

  • On Tuesday, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), and 16 other Senate Democrats introduced the American Homeownership Act. The bill would prevent companies with more than 50 single-family homes for rent from taking deductions for housing value depreciation and mortgage interest payments. Corporations would also be barred from getting federally backed mortgages. (Bill text | Bill fact sheet | Press Release, Feb. 24)
  • The bill would provide a temporary carve-out for companies building new multifamily housing or rehabilitating properties that would otherwise be uninhabitable. (CNBC, Feb. 24)
  • Edward Pinto, co-director of the AEI Housing Center at the American Enterprise Institute, said a more effective proposal would meet three specific criteria: reducing land costs, allowing homes to be built on smaller parcels, and lowering construction costs. (CBS News, Feb. 25)

RER will continue advocating for policies that expand housing supply and protect the capital formation needed to build and preserve housing—rather than measures that risk constraining investment without solving the underlying shortage.

Treasury Signals Revisions for Proposed Section 892 Rules After Industry Feedback

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The U.S. Department of the Treasury is revising its proposed Section 892 regulations after the investment and real estate industries raised concerns that aspects of the framework could raise their cost of capital by deterring passive investment by foreign governments, including sovereign wealth funds.

State of Play

  • A Treasury Department spokesperson told Bloomberg Law the agency is “revising the proposal to address key issues and ensure it supports stable, long-term capital flows,” citing feedback from the investment and real estate industry, including The Real Estate Roundtable (RER). (Bloomberg Law, Feb. 20)
  • The proposed Section 892 regulations (REG-101952-24) address two critical questions that can trigger U.S. tax liability: when a foreign government has effective control of an entity engaged in commercial activities, and when an acquisition of debt by a foreign government is considered to be commercial activity.
  • Treasury tax policy officials also indicated the proposed regulations—if finalized—will not be applied retroactively to existing transactions and structures. (Tax Notes, Feb. 23)

RER Advocacy

  • Earlier this month, RER submitted a comment letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on the Section 892 final and proposed rules, urging clear grandfathering rules and changes to prevent disruptions to sovereign investment in U.S. real estate. (Letter, Feb. 12)
  • The letter recommended targeted fixes, including clarifying that customary minority protections do not create effective control; confirming that withholding agents may rely on foreign government self-certifications; and adding safe harbors (including for certain distressed-debt modifications).
  • RER’s recommendations would ensure U.S. real estate owners and developers can continue to mobilize capital from foreign government sources while preserving Section 892’s fundamental distinction between tax-exempt investment activities and taxable commercial activities. (Roundtable Weekly, Feb. 13)

RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) Advocacy

  • The letter was developed by TPAC’s Section 892 Working Group, which includes representatives from a diverse group of foreign investors, U.S. real estate sponsors, and outside advisors.The principal drafter was TPAC member and Skadden partner Nickolas Gianou.

RER will continue engaging Treasury to ensure the final Section 892 regulations do not discourage sovereign capital that supports U.S. real estate investment and jobs.

The Fed Signals Capital and Liquidity Reforms as Basel III Endgame Work Continues

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The Federal Reserve is moving to recalibrate key elements of the U.S. bank capital and liquidity framework, including Basel III Endgame implementation and targeted mortgage-capital adjustments. The Fed’s Vice Chair for Supervision, Michelle Bowman, signaled this week that reforms should support market liquidity and credit availability while maintaining safety and soundness. (FinancialTimes, Feb. 16)

State of Play

  • Bowman told bankers at the ABA’s 2026 Conference for Community Bankers this week that the Fed will soon seek comment on two proposals to encourage banks to re-engage in mortgage origination and servicing, within the Basel framework. (Speech, Feb. 16)
  • Bowman pointed to a “concerning trend” of mortgage activity to nonbanks. She cited data showing banks originated roughly 60% of mortgages in 2008 and serviced roughly 95% of outstanding balances; by 2023, those figures had fallen to about 35% and about 45%, respectively. (HousingWire, Feb.16).
  • The mortgage capital discussion comes as the Trump administration seeks tools to bolster affordability and credit availability, including directing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities. (Reuters, Feb. 18)
  • “By creating a resilient mortgage market that includes robust participation from all types of financial institutions, we can deliver affordable credit and high-quality servicing to borrowers regardless of economic conditions,” Bowman said. (Speech, Feb. 16)
  • Bowman said the shift has implications for the banking industry, mortgage market stability, and consumers.

Basel III Endgame

  • In separate remarks on Feb. 19, Bowman said regulators are modernizing the “four pillars” of the capital framework—stress testing, supplementary leverage ratio (SLR), Basel III Endgame, and the G-SIB surcharge—with a focus on market liquidity and affordable homeownership alongside safety and soundness. (Speech, Feb. 19)
  • Bowman said the Basel effort is “bottom-up,” not “reverse engineered,” arguing that finalizing Basel III would reduce uncertainty and provide clarity for bank capital standards. (PoliticoPro, Feb. 19)
  • The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) recently submitted their Basel-related proposals to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review—an important step in the interagency process. (Reuters, Feb. 13)
  • The Trump administration regulators have said they plan to rewrite liquidity rules, though details have not been released. (PoliticoPro, Feb. 19)
  • Bowman’s recent remarks are the clearest signal yet of how the Fed may recalibrate the U.S. approach to Basel capital implementation, following industry concerns that earlier proposals could constrain credit and further shift activity to less-regulated lenders.

Roundtable Advocacy

  • In December, RER and a coalition of leading business trade organizations urged prudential regulators to examine and modernize large bank capital requirements so they continue supporting consumers, businesses, and the broader U.S. economy. (Letter, Dec. 2)
  • The coalition letter underscored the negative economic impacts of inappropriately calibrated capital rules, highlighted risks to American competitiveness, and commended ongoing agency efforts to improve the framework. (Roundtable Weekly, Dec. 5)

What’s Next

  • The Fed is expected to issue the mortgage-capital proposals for public comment before any changes take effect, while agencies continue advancing a revised Basel III Endgame package.
  • Bowman is expected to testify next Thursday alongside the heads of the OCC, the FDIC, and the National Credit Union Administration at a Senate oversight hearing. (WSJ, Feb. 19)

As regulators advance both targeted mortgage capital adjustments and a revised Basel III Endgame proposal, RER will remain engaged to ensure capital reforms do not constrain credit flows essential to commercial real estate, economic activity, and long-term investment, while protecting safety and soundness.

Commercial Real Estate Sentiment Steady in Q1 2026 as Debt Availability Improves

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) today released its First Quarter 2026 Sentiment Index, a quarterly measure of confidence among senior commercial real estate (CRE) executives. The overall index registered 66, down one point from Q4 2025, as respondents described a market in the early stages of a tentative, uneven recovery. Tariffs and interest-rate uncertainty continue to widen buyer-seller spreads and slow price discovery. (Q1 Report, News Release, Feb. 20)

Topline Findings

The Q1 Sentiment Index topline findings include:

  • The Q1 2026 Real Estate Roundtable Sentiment Index registered an overall score of 66, a decrease of one point from the previous quarter. The Current Index registered 66, a two-point increase over Q4 2025. The Future Index posted a score of 67 points, a decrease of two points from the previous quarter, reflecting a prevailing sentiment that the market is in the early stages of a tentative, uneven recovery. Political, tariff, and interest rate uncertainty is contributing to wide spreads between buyers and sellers. Amid the uncertainty around pricing clarity and geopolitical stability, participants are cautiously optimistic for an improved 2026.
  • Although perspectives vary by asset class, overall market sentiment trends positive. Less than 10% of respondents believe that general market conditions are worse than this time last year, and 63% believe that general market conditions are better than this time last year. Furthermore, 64% expect general market conditions to show improvement one year from now. Leaders reported strength in data centers and industrial, while returns in the multifamily and office sectors remain heavily location-dependent.
  • Forty-three percent (43%) of respondents believe asset values are roughly unchanged compared to a year ago. Nearly half of participants are seeing green shoots, as 48% believe asset prices have increased while only 9% believe they have declined. Looking ahead, the outlook is optimistic: 67% expect asset prices to rise over the next year, 30% believe asset values will remain stable, and only 3% anticipate a slight decline.
  • Perceptions of equity capital availability are muted relative to last quarter, although about four in 10 respondents (42%) still believe equity availability is better than a year ago. On the other hand, sentiment around debt capital has risen significantly, with 78% saying the availability of debt capital has improved from last year. Looking ahead, 65% believe equity capital availability will be better in one year, and 49% believe debt capital availability will be better.

Roundtable View

  • RER President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer said, “This quarter’s survey shows the market is stabilizing, with improving debt availability and growing optimism about the year ahead—even as uncertainty continues to keep transaction volume below potential.”
  • “The industry is positioned for a more constructive 2026, but sustained momentum will depend on a stable policy environment,” DeBoer added. “That stability supports investment decisions that drive jobs, housing, and economic activity in communities nationwide.”

Data for the Q1 survey was gathered by Chicago-based Ferguson Partners on RER’s behalf in January. See the full Q1 report.

First Circuit Hears Denham Oral Argument as SECA Limited Partner Fight Continues

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The legal dispute over the tax code’s limited partner exception from self-employment (SECA) taxes remains very much alive, with the issue now in various stages of litigation before three federal appellate courts. The IRS is asserting that a limited partner must be a passive investor.

Denham Oral Arguments

  • On Feb. 5, the First Circuit heard oral argument in Denham Capital Management LP, et al. v. Commissioner (No. 25-1349), while a related appeal in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. Commissioner is pending in the Second Circuit. The Fifth Circuit also recently issued a significant decision in Sirius Solutions, L.L.L.P. v. Commissioner (No. 24-60240). (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 30)
  • The First Circuit heard oral arguments in Denham before Chief Judge David Barron, Judge Kermit Lipez, and Judge Lara Montecalvo Rikelman. Most of the argument focused on jurisdictional issues, which could allow the court to resolve the case without reaching the merits.
  • On the merits, the panel posed tough questions to Denham and the IRS. The discussion focused on the meaning of a limited partner in 1977 when the exception was enacted, prior case law, relevant dictionary definitions, the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, and the provision’s legislative history.
  • In the course of the argument, Denham emphasized state law developments leading up to the 1977 amendments and, notably, cited The Real Estate Roundtable’s (RER) amicus brief in support of its position. (RER Amicus Brief, Aug. 15; Roundtable Weekly, Sept. 12, 2025)

Why It Matters

  • Income-producing real estate is predominantly owned and operated through partnerships, and the IRS’s litigation campaign creates risk for long-standing structures relied on by real estate and other pass-through businesses.
  • A circuit split among the First, Second, and Fifth Circuits could accelerate Supreme Court review of the issue.

RER Advocacy

  • RER is actively engaged across the circuits to oppose the IRS’s restrictive “passive investor” approach:
  • First Circuit (Denham): RER filed an amicus brief in August 2025 supporting the taxpayer’s challenge to the Tax Court’s judge-made “passive investor” test and explaining the long-standing reliance of real estate partnerships on state-law limited partner status.
  • Second Circuit (Soroban): RER filed an amicus brief in December 2025 urging reversal of the Tax Court’s Soroban approach and warning that a new federal “passivity” overlay would inject uncertainty and increase tax burdens for partnership-based businesses. (Roundtable Weekly, Dec. 19, 2025)
  • Fifth Circuit (Sirius): RER filed an amicus brief in 2024, and the Fifth Circuit’s Jan. 16, 2026 decision rejected the Tax Court’s passivity-focused framework in favor of a status-based analysis tied to limited liability.  (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 30)

What’s Next

  • The First Circuit’s decision in Denham could turn on jurisdictional challenges, but the merits questions at argument underscored that the government’s “passive investor” theory remains contested and unstable across the courts.

RER will continue pressing its position through amicus advocacy to protect the flexibility inherent in partnership tax rules and preserve the long-standing tax exemption for limited partners.

Roundtable Urges Treasury to Modify Proposed Regulations on Sovereign Investment in U.S. Real Estate

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) submitted a comment letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Treasury’s recently issued Section 892 regulations and related proposed rules that could materially affect sovereign investment in U.S. real estate. (Letter, Feb. 12)

Why It Matters

  • Foreign investment, including investment by sovereign wealth funds, foreign pension funds, and other government entities, is a critical source of financing for capital-intensive U.S. real estate projects.
  • Since 2011, foreign governmental investors have invested over $100 billion in U.S. commercial real estate.
  • “This patient and long-duration foreign capital drives ambitious and transformative investments that create new housing supply, lower housing costs, and spur job growth and economic opportunity in American cities,” wrote Roundtable President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer.
  • Section 892 generally exempts from U.S. tax certain dividend and interest income—and gains on sales of securities—earned by foreign governments, unless the income is treated as commercial activity income or income from a controlled commercial entity. The provision traces back to 1917.
  • On Dec. 15, Treasury released final Section 892 regulations and issued new proposed regulations addressing two key questions: (1) when a foreign government has effective control of an entity engaged in commercial activities, and (2) when an acquisition of debt is considered commercial activity.
  • These issues have important consequences for existing and future sovereign investment in U.S. real estate.

RER Recommendations

  • The RER letter commends Treasury for its general approach and for clarifying specific issues. At the same time, RER expressed concerns regarding aspects of the proposed regulations that could disrupt inbound real estate investment and raise the cost of capital for U.S. real estate projects.
  • For example, the proposed rules can be read to restrict foreign governmental investors’ ability to secure certain investor protections, such as veto rights over major investment and financing decisions. Such restrictions could deter and discourage foreign governments from investing in the United States.
  • The letter highlights these concerns while offering specific solutions that Treasury could incorporate in its final rulemaking. These include:
  • Clarifying that customary minority investor veto rights do not create effective control;
  • Grandfathering existing investments;
  • Confirming U.S. withholding agents can rely on self-certifications from foreign governments;
  • Clarifying that certain modifications of distressed debt are not commercial activity; and
  • Establishing debt-related safe harbors for specific situations.
  • In short, RER’s recommendations would ensure U.S. real estate owners and developers can continue to mobilize capital from foreign government sources while preserving Section 892’s fundamental distinction between tax-exempt investment activities and taxable commercial activities.

RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) Advocacy

  • The letter was developed by TPAC’s Section 892 Working Group, which includes representatives from a diverse group of foreign investors, U.S. real estate sponsors, and outside advisors. The principal drafter was TPAC member and Skadden partner Nickolas Gianou.

The current Administration and Treasury leadership have emphasized the importance of passive foreign investment to U.S. job creation and growth. Treasury has not yet indicated when it anticipates finalizing the new Section 892 proposed regulations.

House Passes Bipartisan Housing Package; HFSC Hearings Spotlight Affordability and Secondary Mortgage Market

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

This week, the House overwhelmingly passed the bipartisan Housing for the 21st Century Act (H.R. 6644). Following Monday’s vote on this sweeping bill, the House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) held a hearing on Tuesday to examine how policies in the financial services and housing sectors contributed to rising cost-of-living pressures for American families by restricting access to capital and credit. On Wednesday, the Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance held a hearing to examine housing affordability and the role of the secondary mortgage market.

Housing for the 21st Century Act

  • On Monday, the House approved the bipartisan Housing for the 21st Century Act by a 390-9 vote, marking one of the strongest bipartisan housing votes in recent years. (The Hill, Feb. 10)
  • Led by HFSC Chairman French Hill (R-AR) and Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA), the legislation includes provisions to streamline housing production and affordability by updating outdated programs, removing unnecessary federal requirements, increasing local flexibility, and allowing banks to more freely deploy funding.  (The Hill, Feb. 10 | Comment Letter, Feb. 6)
  • The bill addresses a housing shortfall of up to 5.5 million units, driven by regulatory delays, zoning constraints, and rising construction costs. (The Hill, Feb. 6)
  • In a Feb. 6 letter to Congress, The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) joined a group of national real estate and housing organizations in expressing “strong support” for the measure, commending the HFSC for advancing “practical, solutions-oriented housing policy.” (Comment Letter, Feb. 6)
  • The coalition added that the bill “supports increased housing supply, improved access to homeownership, and appropriate consumer protections, particularly in high-cost and underserved communities.” (Comment Letter, Feb. 6)
  • The bill’s passage in the House sets up negotiations with the Senate, which passed its own housing legislation—the ROAD to Housing Act—late last year. The two bills contain similar supply-side reforms but differ on certain grant programs and community bank provisions. (Punchbowl News, Dec. 14)

Hearing on Affordability Crisis

  • On Feb. 10, the HFSC held a hearing titled, “Priced Out of the American Dream: Understanding the Policies Behind Rising Costs of Housing and Borrowing,” focused on legislative and regulatory proposals to address the affordability crisis. (HFSC Hearing, Feb. 10)
  • The hearing noticed three proposals to restrict institutional investment in single-family rentals (SFRs)—a topic that has gained momentum following a related Executive Order issued last month. However, the SFR issue surfaced only briefly during Tuesday’s session, and none of the restrictive measures advanced. (Executive Order, Jan. 20)
  • In a Feb. 10 comment letter to HFSC leadership, RER and national real estate trade groups cautioned against limiting institutional capital in the housing market, including SFR assets. (Comment Letter, Feb. 10)
  • The letter explained, “There is no evidence that institutional investors are crowding out prospective homebuyers,” citing data showing that institutional investors accounted for just 0.3 percent of the $2 trillion in single-family home purchases over the past year. (Comment Letter, Feb. 10)
  • The letter highlighted the positive developments that institutional investors have contributed to the market, stating, “Institutional SFR investment expands rental supply in markets where it was previously limited, increases access to high-opportunity neighborhoods, and benefits households with lower incomes, wealth, and savings.” (Comment Letter, Feb. 10)
  • RER and coalition partners also urged lawmakers to avoid policies that would restrict capital formation and instead prioritize supply-forward reforms to close the nation’s housing gap. (Comment Letter, Feb. 10)

Homeownership and the Secondary Mortgage Market

  • On Feb. 11, the HFSC’s Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance held a hearing titled, “Homeownership and the Role of the Secondary Mortgage Market,” examining the structure, function, and evolution of the market and how the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac impact housing affordability. (HFSC Subcommittee Hearing, Feb. 11)
  • In his opening remarks, Subcommittee Chairman Mike Flood discussed the importance of liquidity and capital efficiency in today’s regulatory environment.
  • “The secondary mortgage market works to provide greater liquidity for lenders and results in greater access to mortgage lending for borrowers. In today’s banking regulatory climate, holding a mortgage on a bank’s balance sheet can result in significant capital costs,” Chairman Flood said. (Rep. Flood Press Release, Feb. 11)
  • Chairman Flood added that no legislation was noticed during the hearing, as the session was intended to explore the subject matter in-depth.
  • Bob Broeksmit, President and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association, touched on the substantial role that GSEs play in the secondary market. He also advocated that any reforms enacted to end the GSEs’ government conservatorship provide “an ample runway to ensure deep, liquid secondary markets for single-family and multifamily mortgages through all economic cycles and in all geographic regions.” (MBA Testimony, Feb. 11)

RER will continue engaging lawmakers in both chambers to advance durable housing solutions and sensible GSE reforms that support homeownership, expand affordable housing supply, and sustain economic growth.

House Passes Bipartisan FSOC Reform Bill

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The House passed six bipartisan bills from the House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) this week, including the Real Estate Roundtable (RER)-backed Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) Improvement Act of 2025. (H.R. 3682). (Press Release, Feb 9)

 FSOC Improvement Act of 2025

  • The House passed the bill unanimously by voice vote after the HFSC approved H.R. 3682 during its Sept. 16, 2025, markup.
  • The bill would reform FSOC by strengthening transparency, accountability, and procedural safeguards in its decision-making process. It is intended to bolster due-process protections, improve interagency coordination, and ensure designations are based on rigorous analysis.
  • The bill would require FSOC to consult with a company and its primary regulator before designating a nonbank as a Systemically Important Financial Institution (SIFI). (Letter, Oct. 28)

RER Advocacy

  • RER and coalition partners sent a letter of support for H.R.3682 in October 2025, emphasizing an activities-based approach to systemic risk, transparent cost-benefit analysis, and clear procedural guardrails to improve predictability and interagency coordination. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 31)
  • The October letter built on a July 2025 coalition letter urging FSOC to rescind its 2023 interpretive guidance and reinstate its 2019 framework, citing due-process protections and stronger coordination with primary regulators. (Roundtable Weekly, July 18)
  • RER has consistently urged regulators to focus on systemic-risk activities—not broad entity designations that can fuel regulatory overreach and create unintended consequences for liquidity, capital formation, and credit availability.

What’s Next

The bill now moves to the Senate Banking Committee for consideration.

FSOC Hearing Highlights Nonbank Oversight as CRE Reacts to Fed Chair Nomination

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

This week, the House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) and Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee held hearings with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to review the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s (FSOC) 2025 Annual Report. Lawmakers used the session to raise broader concerns about financial regulation, capital formation, and credit availability, including attention on FSOC’s role in banking regulation.

FSOC and Regulatory Direction

  • In his testimony, Sec. Bessent described a recalibrated approach at FSOC that focuses on identifying specific risky activities, rather than broadly regulating entire firms or sectors. He criticized prior “regulation by reflex” and stated that FSOC should avoid labeling wide swaths of the financial system as vulnerable, absent clear, material risk. (Watch Hearing)  
  • “FSOC should… work with its members to support efforts to avoid or pare back existing regulation that stifles pro-growth lending, capital formation, and innovation. And the best way to achieve these goals is by centering economic growth and economic security at the heart of FSOC’s agenda,” Sec. Bessent said. (Politico Pro, Feb. 4)
  • Several exchanges focused on FSOC’s authority to designate nonbank financial companies as Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs). Sec. Bessent confirmed a preference for an activities-based framework, signaling openness to clearer standards and restraint in the use of entity-based designations. (Watch Hearing)  
  • Sec. Bessent added that he would propose new nonbank guidance later this year, and that he supports higher deposit insurance to protect small banks’ competitiveness against larger institutions. (Politico Pro, Feb. 4)
  • He also supported HFSC Chairman French Hill’s (R-AR) community banking legislative package. He emphasized that small and community banks need tailored capital and risk standards to succeed. (American Banker, Feb. 4)
  • Democratic lawmakers warned that easing regulatory scrutiny could increase systemic risk and repeat conditions that preceded the 2008 financial crisis, with HFSC Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) arguing that FSOC should play a stronger role in identifying risks across the financial system, including among nonbank entities. (Watch Hearing)

Affordability and Tariffs

  • During the HFSC hearing, Ranking Member Waters pressed Sec. Bessent on whether the administration’s tariffs have contributed to persistent inflation. Sec. Bessent rejected that characterization and disputed claims that he had previously warned investors tariffs were inflationary. (American Banker, Feb. 4)
  • Ranking Member Waters also linked tariffs directly to worsening housing affordability, pointing to duties on key construction inputs such as lumber, steel, and appliances. (American Banker, Feb. 4)
  • While Democrats argued that tariffs and high prices continue to burden consumers, Sec. Bessent cited a Wharton study that points to immigration-driven demand as a contributing factor to higher housing costs. (CNBC, Feb. 4)

Roundtable Advocacy

  • The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) and coalition partners have supported the Financial Stability Oversight Council Improvement Act (H.R.3682), which would require FSOC to consult with a company and its primary regulator before designating a nonbank as a SIFI. (Letter, Oct. 28)
  • The bill is intended to strengthen due-process protections, improve interagency coordination, and ensure designations are based on rigorous analysis.
  • RER has consistently urged regulators to focus on activities that pose genuine systemic risk, rather than imposing broad designations that can create regulatory overreach and unintended consequences for credit markets. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 31)

CRE’s Reaction to Fed Chair Nomination

  • Last week, President Donald Trump announced his nomination of Kevin Warsh, a former Federal Reserve Governor, to succeed Fed Chair Jerome Powell. (Axios, Jan. 30)
  • As industry media outlets have reported, commercial real estate and finance leaders have broadly welcomed the nomination, citing Warsh’s experience from the financial crisis and his capital markets expertise. (Bisnow, Jan. 30)
  • “Kevin Warsh is a smart, thoughtful, and experienced nominee. His deep understanding of monetary policy and financial markets would help maintain and strengthen market confidence at a time when economic certainty matters most,” Jeffrey D. DeBoer, RER President and CEO, said.
  • Bob Broeksmit, President and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association, said in a statement that Warsh’s prior service on the Fed board gave him a reputation as “a prudent, thoughtful voice on monetary policy.”(ConnectCRE, Jan. 30)
  • CRE finance experts noted that while Warsh’s nomination could raise expectations for near-term rate cuts, uncertainty surrounding the confirmation process and Fed independence may keep long-term Treasury yields, as well as permanent financing costs, elevated. (ConnectCRE, Jan. 30)

RER remains committed to engaging policymakers on FSOC reform and related financial regulations to ensure oversight frameworks support capital formation, liquidity, and economic growth.

Treasury Considering Extension of Bonus Depreciation to Certain Existing Real Estate Investments

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The U.S. Treasury Department is reviewing real estate industry concerns that many firms may be locked out of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OB3) Act’s restored 100 percent bonus depreciation because of prior elections made to opt out of the Section 163(j) business interest limitation. (Bloomberg, Feb. 3)

State of Play

  • The restoration of 100 percent expensing for capital expenditures, including tenant and nonresidential property improvements, is among the most significant provisions in the OB3 Act.
  • Treasury tax policy advisor Dan Penrith acknowledged the concern at the American Bar Association Tax Section’s midyear meeting in San Diego. Penrith stated that the issue is “on our radar, it’s something that we’re thinking about,” signaling potential openness to targeted administrative relief. (Bloomberg, Feb. 3)
  • The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) has urged Treasury guidance to allow “real property trades or businesses (RPTOBs)” that previously elected out of Section 163(j) to withdraw or amend that election—so they can fully benefit from the OB3 Act’s restored bonus depreciation for eligible property improvements. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 17)

Why It Matters

  • The RPTOB election historically enabled full interest deductibility, but required the alternative depreciation system, making taxpayers ineligible for bonus depreciation.
  • Without additional guidance, many taxpayers may not qualify for bonus depreciation on property improvements, despite Congress’s intent to spur investment through 100 percent expensing.
  • There is precedent for allowing flexibility. During the pandemic, IRS Revenue Procedure 2020-22 provided an opportunity for certain taxpayers to withdraw a prior Section 163(j)(7)(B) election in response to CARES Act changes. (Revenue Procedure 2020-22)
  • As RER’s SVP & Counsel Ryan McCormick told Bloomberg Tax: “We’re seeking similar flexibility,” adding that it’s “really important for the future.” (Bloomberg, Feb. 3)

Roundtable Advocacy

  • In an Oct. 17, 2025, letter, RER wrote to Treasury urging guidance to ensure the OB3 Act’s restored 100 percent bonus depreciation provision supports real estate investment, job creation, and economic growth.
  • The letter emphasized that clear implementing rules will help bonus depreciation “facilitate the modernization and repurposing of real estate assets,” including underutilized offices, shopping centers, hotels, and mixed-use properties. (Roundtable Weekly, Oct. 17)

RER will continue engaging Treasury as it considers next steps to ensure the OB3 Act’s bonus depreciation provisions deliver on their intended investment and growth impact.