Tag: Housing

House Passes Landmark Housing Bill, Sending Bipartisan Package Back to Senate

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The House passed the amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act on Wednesday by a vote of 396-13, sending the bipartisan housing package back to the Senate for final consideration. The legislation includes major reforms to expand housing supply, modernize federal housing programs, reduce regulatory barriers, and removes the Senate bill’s unconstitutional forced-sale mandate targeting build-to-rent (BTR) housing. (Politico | The Hill, May 20)

State of Play

  • House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill (R-AR) and Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) led months of bipartisan negotiations over the landmark housing package, navigating extensive back-and-forth among the White House, House leadership, and the Senate. (View Bill Text |  One-Pager | Section-by-Section ) 
  • The White House indicated it will back the House version of the bill, as the legislation moves to the Senate for final approval. (White House SAP, May 20 | CNBC)
  • The House-passed version amends the Senate-approved legislation, addressing concerns raised by House members and industry stakeholders, while preserving core reforms to streamline housing development, improve affordability, encourage new construction, update outdated HUD programs, restore critical community banking provisions, and eliminate burdensome regulatory barriers. (House Financial Services Committee Press Release, May 20)
  • Chairman Hill said, “Today, we proved Washington still works. After months of bipartisan, bicameral negotiations—and with the partnership of the Trump Administration—the House delivered to make housing more accessible and affordable for American families.”(House Financial Services Committee Press Release, May 20)
  • Ranking Member Waters added, “I am beyond proud of this legislation and the benefits it will bring to all of our cities, counties and states. The Senate must meet this moment with the same urgency and determination and quickly pass this bill.” (Rep. Waters Press Release, May 21)
  • In a joint statement before the House vote, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-SC) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said there is “still work to be done” on a final bill. (Senate Banking Committee Press Release, May 20)
  • Chairman Hill urged Senate negotiators to support the amended House bill, calling it “the best landing spot for the two chambers” and saying it reflects both chambers’ priorities and their shared commitment to a “bicameral bipartisan housing bill.” (Watch–Fox News | Roll Call, May 21)

What’s In the Bill

  • The House-passed bill preserves the core housing supply and affordability provisions in the Senate package, including reforms to streamline environmental reviews, reduce barriers to new construction, modernize HUD programs, support manufactured housing, and encourage local zoning and land-use reforms. (Bipartisan Policy Center, May 20)
  • The most significant change is the removal of the Senate’s unconstitutional seven-year forced-sale mandate for BTR housing, which would have required certain owners to sell newly built single-family rental homes after seven years. (Axios, May 21)
  • Both Chairman Hill and Ranking Member Waters raised concerns about the provision’s constitutionality this week during their floor statements and an appearance on CNBC’s Squawkbox. (SquawkBox, May 19 | Roll Call, May 21 | Rep. Waters Floor Statement, May 19)
  • The bill still limits large institutional investors—defined as entities controlling at least 350 single-family homes—from buying additional single-family homes. However, it includes exceptions for BTR homes, newly constructed or renovated homes, rental conversions, and homes sold by another large institutional investor that already owned the property or acquired it in compliance with the bill. (Bisnow, May 20)
  • The bill also restores critical community banking provisions and includes measures to expand community lending, support transit-oriented development, improve federal tools for renters and homeowners, and convert abandoned buildings into housing.
  • Key provisions include:
  • Manufactured housing reforms to eliminate the outdated 1974 “permanent chassis” requirement for manufactured homes, which supporters estimate could reduce production costs by thousands of dollars per unit.
  • Zoning incentives to provide grants to local governments that adopt “pattern books” of pre-approved housing designs to speed up construction.
  • Permitting and development reforms to reduce delays, streamline environmental reviews, and lower barriers to new housing production.
  • Community lending and housing finance tools to support local development capacity, expand access to housing, and strengthen federal housing programs.

Roundtable Advocacy

  • The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) strongly endorsed the House amendment, which advances several housing supply and affordability reforms RER has long championed. (RER Statement | May 20)
  • “The latest amendment is focused where it should be — on increasing housing supply,” said RER President and CEO Jeffrey D. DeBoer. “Its sections to boost manufactured housing; help support renters interested in home ownership; build more homes in Opportunity Zones; streamline excessive environmental reviews that delay residential construction; encourage transit-oriented development; and promote much-needed land-use and zoning reforms, among other provisions, all add up to a comprehensive and robust package of smart housing policy.” (RER Statement | May 20)
  • Over the last several months, RER has led efforts to raise constitutional concerns about the Senate’s forced-sale mandate, including through a white paper by former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, which characterized the provision as an unprecedented federal market intervention and outlined a “triple threat” to the U.S. Constitution. (RER’s One Pager, May 18 | RER Letter, May 12 | Roundtable Weekly, April 17)
  • More than 125 housing advocacy and industry groups supported the House amendment, urging lawmakers to advance legislation that would modernize outdated housing programs, reduce barriers to development, and increase flexibility for local communities. (Coalition Letter, May 18)
  • Following House passage, RER joined 10 other national housing organizations in commending House leadership for their work, while urging the Senate to swiftly pass the revised Act, calling it one of the most significant housing proposals in a generation. (Statement May 20)

What’s Next

  • The legislation now returns to the Senate, where lawmakers will determine whether to accept the House-passed package or pursue additional changes. With Congress out next week for recess, the earliest the Senate could take up the bill is June.
  • Sens. Scott and Warren have indicated they are not ready to accept the House-passed bill as-is and continue to push for the Senate-approved text. (Politico, May 21)
  • Neither Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) nor Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has publicly indicated whether they will support the House-amended package. (Politico, May 21)

RER and its coalition partners will continue working with lawmakers as the housing bill moves back to the Senate to ensure the final package remains focused on increasing housing supply, improving affordability, protecting private property rights, and supporting the capital needed to build more homes nationwide

Housing Supply Push Gains Momentum with New Tax and Regulatory Proposals

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

Federal policymakers offered new measures aimed at boosting housing supply this week, including bipartisan tax legislation to encourage rental construction and new Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recommendations to reduce state and local regulatory barriers to homebuilding.

Rental Housing Investment Act

  • Reps. Claudia Tenney (R-NY), Linda Sánchez (D-CA), Darin LaHood (R-IL), and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA) introduced the Rental Housing Investment Act, bipartisan legislation to increase the supply of long-term rental housing by modernizing the tax code and incentivizing new construction. (Press Release, May 21)
  • The bill would allow builders to immediately deduct up to $150,000 per rental unit in construction costs for qualifying long-term residential rental housing developments, with an increased deduction of up to $250,000 per unit for qualifying affordable housing projects.
  • The legislation includes safeguards to ensure properties remain in long-term rental use and would apply to newly constructed housing placed in service after enactment.
  • “This bipartisan legislation takes a practical, market-driven approach to expanding housing supply, reducing development costs, and helping make housing more affordable for hardworking Americans,” said Rep. Tenney. (Press Release, May 21)
  • The bill’s bipartisan co-sponsors emphasized that high construction costs and limited rental supply are driving affordability challenges in communities across the country.
  •  A similar bill was previously introduced in the Senate by Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE). A Tax Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) panel will discuss the bill and other housing tax incentives at The Real Estate Roundtable’s Annual Meeting in June.

HUD Regulatory Best Practices

  • HUD Secretary Scott Turner said the agency is encouraging state and local partners to review their regulations and policies to “lower the cost to build and enable more efficient housing supply growth.”
  • HUD noted that regulatory costs account for more than $100,000 of the final price of a new single-family home, while certain state and local green energy mandates can add up to $30,000 to construction costs. (HousingWire, May 20)

Housing Momentum

  • The housing debate was also front and center at an Axios event this week, where lawmakers highlighted growing bipartisan momentum around supply-side reforms, deregulation, zoning flexibility, and alternative construction methods. (Watch, May 20)
  • Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) said “housing is having a moment in Washington, D.C.,” while Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) emphasized that housing supply is also an economic development issue tied to workforce shortages and regional growth. (Axios, May 21)

These new legislative and regulatory actions reflect growing bipartisan attention to the core drivers of housing affordability: supply shortages, high construction costs, land-use barriers, lengthy permitting timelines, and financing constraints. RER will continue working with policymakers to advance supply-side reforms that encourage private capital, reduce construction barriers, and expand housing supply nationwide.

Coalition Statement on House Passage of the Amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

11 National Organizations Commend the House for its Work, Now Call on Senate to Swiftly Pass the Act

The undersigned housing groups representing thousands of housing providers and tens of millions of residents commend the House of Representatives for its bipartisan passage of the recently amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.

The revised Act, like all compromise legislation, is not perfect. Nevertheless, it is one that our organizations support as it encompasses some of the most significant housing proposals in a generation.
As the process moves forward, it will be vital that the final language safeguards millions of BTR homes and the individuals and families that are building their lives in them.

The Act includes many meaningful reforms that will help modernize federal housing programs, reduce barriers to development, and encourage the production and preservation of more housing nationwide. This revised legislation will help communities expand housing supply, improve affordability, and create more pathways to both rental housing and homeownership.

In the days to come, we look forward to working with lawmakers and the Department of the Treasury to finalize important aspects of the bill around implementation and interpretation and make sure that BTR housing can continue to play such a robust and vital role in providing the rental housing the nation needs.

Now, as the President has indicated that he will sign the revised Act, this Coalition urges the Senate to pass this major legislation.

The amended 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act is a key win for members of Congress, the Administration and, most importantly, the American people.

Download Statement

  • Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition
  • Leading Builders of America
  • MBA
  • NAA
  • NAHB
  • NAHMA
  • Nareit
  • NHC
  • NLHA
  • NMHC
  • RER

# # #

The Real Estate Roundtable Supports Bipartisan House Amendment to 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) —Jeffrey D. DeBoer, President and CEO of The Real Estate Roundtable (RER), issued the following statement:

“We strongly support the House’s bipartisan amendment to the 21st Century Road to Housing Act scheduled for House floor consideration today.

Significantly, this bill eliminates the unconstitutional “forced sale” of build-to-rent housing that plagued prior versions.

Moreover, the latest amendment is focused where it should be — on increasing housing supply. Its sections to boost manufactured housing; help support renters interested in home ownership; build more homes in Opportunity Zones; streamline excessive environmental reviews that delay residential construction; encourage transit-oriented development; and promote much-needed land-use and zoning reforms, among other provisions, all add up to a comprehensive and robust package of smart housing policy.

We congratulate Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill and Ranking Member Waters on their landmark bipartisan accomplishment. Congress should pass the measure without delay so more homes that are safe, modern, and affordable can be delivered for the American people.”

#     #     #

House Releases Revised Housing Package Focused on Supply and Affordability

Posted on by abigail_grenadier
U.S. Capitol building

House leaders this week released amended text of the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, preserving major pro-housing provisions aimed at increasing supply, improving affordability, and expanding housing options across the country. The revised package is expected to receive a House vote next week, before returning to the Senate for final approval. (Politico | Bisnow | The Hill, May 14)

State of Play

  • House Republican leaders continued reworking the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act this week, even as President Donald Trump publicly urged Congress to pass the Senate bill as written. (Politico, May 11)
  • Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said Friday that he still intends for the House to vote on changes to the Senate’s housing package, despite opposition from White House officials and Senate Republicans. “We’re focused on producing a housing bill that meets all the objectives,” Speaker Johnson said. “It’ll be bipartisan, bicameral.” (Politico, May 15)
  • House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill (R-AR) and Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) released the House’s amended text Thursday, with leadership aiming to bring the bill to the floor next week. (The Hill, May 14)
  • Rep. Hill said the bipartisan amendment reflects concerns raised by members and stakeholders, adding that it “cuts unnecessary barriers to new home construction, modernizes Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs, and allows banks to more freely deploy funding into their communities.” (Rep. Hill Statement, May 14)

  • Speaking to reporters Friday, Rep. Hill said the House bill addresses legal concerns raised by the Senate’s investor restriction language, including its forced-sale requirement for certain build-to-rent homes. “It’s in the bill in the right way. I think it removes some of the legal challenges that we felt that were in the structure of the Senate bill. We think this has made a better bill.” (Politico, May 15)

  • Rep. Waters said the updated bill “restores key provisions to hold institutional investors accountable and protect renters, while expanding access to affordable housing opportunities for families across the country.”  (Rep. Waters Statement, May 15)
  • In a statement following the release, RER said the amended bill makes significant improvements by removing the forced-disposition requirement that would have raised serious constitutional concerns, chilled investment in new rental housing, prevented the construction of thousands of homes, and worsened supply constraints in markets across the country. (RER Statement, May 14)

  • Progressive and conservative groups alike have cited numerous benefits that single-family rental (SFR) owners and builders deliver to U.S. housing markets, including increasing supply, maintaining and improving homes, and providing opportunities for families to live in communities with strong education systems where homeownership may be out of reach. (Progressive Policy Institute | Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 2026) (Roundtable Weekly, April 17 | April 10)

Key House Revisions

  • The package includes broad housing supply and affordability reforms to reduce barriers to new construction, support manufactured housing innovation, streamline environmental reviews, and modernize HUD programs.
  • The updated House text removes the Senate bill’s forced-disposition requirement for build-to-rent housing, while retaining restrictions and enforcement provisions related to future single-family home acquisitions by large institutional investors. (The Hill, May 14)
  • Additionally, it would create grant programs for converting abandoned buildings into housing, expand community lending, and strengthen tools to encourage local zoning and pro-housing policies.

Roundtable Advocacy

  • RER and broad housing coalitions have consistently emphasized that housing affordability is driven by supply shortages, construction costs, and mortgage rates—not institutional ownership levels—and that restricting institutional capital would only make it harder to meet the nation’s growing housing needs. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16 |  Jan. 23 | Feb. 27| March 6 | March 13 | March 20 | March 27 | April 3 | April 10 | April 17 | April 24 | May 1 | May 8)
  • Following the release of the amended text, RER and a broad housing coalition urged Congress to pass the bill quickly, calling it a major opportunity to expand supply, improve affordability, and broaden housing choice. (Coalition Letter | Coalition Statement | May 14)
  • The housing crisis cannot be solved without building more affordable homes of every type, in every market and for every stage of life — including rental housing, workforce housing and paths to homeownership,” said RER President & CEO Jeffrey DeBoer. “Restricting capital will only make that shortage worse. Increasing supply is the path forward.” (RER Statement | May 14)

HUD Raises Concerns

  • HUD Secretary Scott Turner wrote to congressional leaders Friday to remove parts of the House-amended bill related to institutional investor restrictions and a new tenant hotline, warning they could create significant operational challenges for HUD and expand the department’s role in state and local housing matters. (PoliticoPro, May 15)
  • Sec. Turner also testified before House and Senate appropriators this week on the administration’s fiscal 2027 HUD budget request, emphasizing the need to reduce regulatory barriers, streamline permitting, and lower housing production costs. (Politico, May 12)
  • Sec. Turner cited local zoning restrictions, environmental reviews, and federal regulations as major drivers of housing costs, while lawmakers in both parties raised concerns about proposed HUD funding cuts. (House Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing, May 12)
  • Lawmakers also highlighted Opportunity Zones (OZs) and public-private partnerships as housing production tools. Sec. Turner defended OZs as “very transformative,” saying public-private partnerships are “crucial and key” to increasing affordable housing supply and revitalizing communities. (Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing, May 14)

RER and its coalition partners appreciate the bipartisan work of House and Senate leaders and urge swift passage of the housing bill to expand access to homeownership and rental housing opportunities nationwide.

CRE Leaders Gather in Washington to Discuss Housing, Tax Policy, National Security, Energy, and More

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The Real Estate Roundtable’s (RER) Spring Roundtable Meeting brought commercial real estate leaders to Washington this week for bipartisan discussions on national security, housing, tax policy, energy, and economic growth. The meeting (Roundtable-level members only) came as Congress continued to debate housing legislation, implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and broader questions of U.S. competitiveness and leadership. (RER’s Spring 2026 Policy Priorities and Executive Summary)

Across the agenda, speakers echoed similar concerns and priorities, including strengthening the workforce pipeline, expanding career and technical education, permitting reform, reducing regulatory burdens, and ensuring reliable energy infrastructure to support AI, data centers, and long-term economic growth.

Roundtable Leadership

  • RER Board Chair Kathleen McCarthy Baldwin (Former Global Co-Head of Blackstone Real Estate) opened the meeting by highlighting the value of convening industry leaders in Washington and recognizing the strong leadership across the organization, including the nominating committee’s work and the incoming board members’ efforts to position RER for the year ahead.
  • RER President and CEO Jeffrey DeBoer said that RER’s impact in Washington is built on active member involvement, strong committee engagement, and continued support for REALPAC. “Our voice is strongest when members are engaged, our committees are active, and we continue to invest in the advocacy efforts that help advance the industry’s priorities.”

Speakers & Policy Issues

  • Roundtable members engaged in policy discussions with the following guests:
  • (R-L): Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO) (House Assistant Democratic Leader; Committees: Natural Resources, Rules, and Judiciary), Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) (Committees: Financial Services; Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party), and Rep. George Whitesides (D-CA) (Committees: Science, Space and Technology; Armed Services) joined Monday evening’s dinner conversation on the political landscape, affordability, housing, immigration, and the policy choices shaping the run-up to the midterms. The panel also explored housing supply strategies, bipartisan problem-solving, and what voters are looking for from both parties on economic opportunity and cost-of-living concerns.
  • Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) (Committees: Appropriations; Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs; and Foreign Relations) discussed national security, trade, China, workforce development, and the policy environment needed to strengthen American competitiveness. He also addressed housing supply and his recently introduced Freedom to Build Act, which is intended to incentivize deregulation, expand housing supply, and make homes more affordable by aligning existing federal incentives with communities that reduce barriers to building. (Roundtable Weekly, April 17)
  • Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) (House Financial Services Committee) weighed in on the housing bills and the path toward bridging House and Senate priorities, with particular focus on concerns that Section 901 of the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act could reduce housing supply and create new market uncertainty. He also addressed TRIA reauthorization, mortgage market stability, access to credit, and the need for practical housing solutions that expand supply.
  • David Malpass (former President of the World Bank and former Under Secretary for International Affairs at the U.S. Department of the Treasury) offered his perspective on global economic ambiguity, energy policy, domestic production, labor shortages, and U.S. leadership. He also spoke about permitting reform, workforce development, interest rates, and the policy changes needed to support stronger long-term growth.
  • (L-R): Josh Parker (Chairman & CEO, Ancora Group Capital; Chair, RER’s Tax Policy Advisory Committee), Tony Chereso (President & CEO, The Inland Real Estate Group, LLC), and Ryan McCormick (Senior Vice President & Counsel, RER) led a tax policy panel on Treasury implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Section 892 regulations, Opportunity Zones implementation, FIRPTA, foreign capital, and other issues affecting real estate investment and capital formation.

Next on RER’s meeting calendar is the all-member Annual Meeting on June 9-10, 2026, in Washington, D.C., which will include policy advisory committee sessions.

Bipartisan House Coalition Presses Leadership to Remove Section 901

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

A bipartisan group of 76 House lawmakers urged congressional leaders to remove or revise Section 901 of the Senate-passed 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, arguing that the provision would undermine the bill’s affordability goals by discouraging build-to-rent (BTR) housing and reducing rental options for American families. (Punchbowl News, | PoliticoPro, April 22)

Why It Matters

  • The push adds to growing House resistance as negotiators weigh how to reconcile the two chambers’ housing packages.
  • The letter, led by members of the Congressional Real Estate Caucus and Build America Caucus, warns that Section 901 “would have far-reaching and unintended consequences that run counter to the bill’s stated goal of expanding housing opportunity,” and that the provision goes “far beyond its intended purpose” by threatening to reduce rental options. (Letter | PoliticoPro April 22)
  • Lawmakers argue the provision’s broad definition would also capture the construction of new single-family rental communities—threatening a growing source of housing supply at a time when the nation remains millions of units short. (Letter | Punchbowl News, April 22)
  • Section 901 would require certain large institutional investors to sell newly built single-family rental homes after seven years—a change that could disrupt the long-term ownership model behind BTR communities, constrain capital, and reduce housing options for families seeking the flexibility of a single-family rental home.
  • The housing bill was a major focus at The Real Estate Roundtable’s (RER) Spring Roundtable Meeting this week, where members and policymaker guests discussed the growing pushback to Section 901 and the need for any final package to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions. (See story above)

State of Play

  • Since the Senate passed its version of the bill, progressive and conservative groups alike have cited numerous benefits that single-family rental owners and builders deliver for U.S. housing markets, including expanding supply, maintaining housing stock, and providing families the opportunity to live in communities where homeownership remains out of reach. (Progressive Policy Institute, February 2026 | Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 2026)
  • Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Scott Turner recently toured a build-to-rent (BTR) community with the project’s developer, operator, and industry representatives, underscoring the growing visibility of BTR. (The Real Deal, April 18 | NMHC, April 13)

RER & Industry Advocacy

  • RER and other housing advocates continue to urge lawmakers to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions while removing language that could reduce rental housing production and discourage new investment.
  • RER and broad housing coalitions have consistently emphasized that housing affordability is driven by supply shortages, construction costs, and mortgage rates—not institutional ownership levels—and that restricting institutional capital would only make it harder to meet the nation’s growing housing needs. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16 |  Jan. 23 | Feb. 27| March 6 | March 13 | March 20 | March 27 | April 3 | April 10 | April 17)
  • Last week, RER shared with members of Congress a recent white paper by Paul Clement of Clement & Murphy, PLLC, arguing that Section 901’s forced-sale requirement raises serious constitutional concerns under the Takings Clause, and also raises equal protection and federalism concerns. (Roundtable Weekly, April 17)

As lawmakers work to address the housing shortage, the focus should remain on expanding supply and lowering barriers to development—not on punitive restrictions that threaten new investment, undermine build-to-rent housing, and worsen affordability challenges.

White House Economic Report Underscores Supply Gap as ROAD to Housing Act Stalls

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

Congress returned to Washington this week after a two-week recess with little visible movement on the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, even as House Financial Services Committee staff continued work on a bipartisan response to the Senate-passed bill.

State of Play

  • House and Senate lawmakers remain at odds over how to reconcile the competing housing packages, with the Senate bill’s treatment of institutional investment in single-family housing still one of the biggest sticking points. (Politico, April 14)
  • RER and other housing advocates continue to press lawmakers to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions while removing language that could reduce rental housing production and discourage new investment.

Why It Matters

  • The report says that if single-family homebuilding had continued at its historical pace after 2008, the U.S. would have “10 million or more additional single-family homes today”—a striking measure of the nation’s housing shortfall and the scale of lost supply. (CRE Daily, April 14)
  • White House economists reached that figure by asking how many homes would exist today if construction had continued at its pre-2008 pace, making the estimate as much about lost capacity as current demand. (Propmodo, April 13)
  • The findings reinforce that improving affordability will require more building, more investment, and fewer barriers to supply—and that policies constraining new housing production could worsen affordability rather than improve it.

New Research

  • Updated research continues to undercut the argument that institutional ownership is the main source of today’s affordability challenges.
  • An AEI report released last week says large institutional investors own less than 1 percent of the nation’s single-family homes and concludes that Section 901 of the Senate’s bill would reduce the supply of newly constructed and rehabilitated homes while burdening low- and middle-income renters. (AEI, April 10)
  • Separate Realtor.com research published in March also found that the institutional investor footprint has been shrinking from its 2022 peak. (Politico, April 14 | Realtor, March 13)
  • Recent market data points in the same direction. If institutional investment were the main cause of the nation’s housing affordability problems, the markets with the heaviest investor activity would be consistently posting the strongest price growth. (Roundtable Weekly, April 10 | GAO Report, April 6 | GAO Report, 2024)
  • The latest Case-Shiller data show the opposite pattern: Chicago and New York led annual home-price gains in December 2025, while several Sun Belt metros where institutional investors have been more prominent—including Tampa, Phoenix, Dallas, and Miami—saw prices decline. That divergence reinforces the broader point that supply constraints, not institutional investment alone, are the bigger force shaping affordability. (S&P Global, December 2025 | Realtor, October 2025)

New Housing Legislation Introduced

  • Separate from the House-Senate standoff, Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) this week introduced the Freedom to Build Act, a proposal backed by The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) that would create a HUD “Freedom to Build” certification for localities adopting pro-supply policies such as faster approvals, regulatory streamlining, and other measures to expand housing construction. (Sen. Hagerty Press Release, April 14)
  • The bill is intended to incentivize deregulation, expand housing supply, and make homes more affordable by aligning existing federal incentives with communities that reduce barriers to building.
  • Jeffrey D. DeBoer, President & CEO of RER said, “This legislation would be a meaningful step toward expanding housing supply and improving affordability for working families. The Freedom to Build Act would align federal incentives with local decision-making to help unlock private capital, enhance housing supply, and support long-term economic growth. The Real Estate Roundtable has long supported policies that promote housing affordability—for renters and homeowners—and strengthen the connection between housing, jobs, and transportation.”

Sen. Hagerty will also be a featured guest at RER’s upcoming Spring Roundtable Meeting next week (Roundtable-level members only), where housing supply, affordability, and related policy developments will be among the topics discussed.

Cost Recovery Reform to Spur New Housing Supply Gains Traction in Washington

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

A new report from the influential Center for American Progress (CAP) suggests that allowing immediate expensing for new multifamily rental housing could spur a major increase in multifamily construction and bring down housing costs over the next decade. (CAP Report, March 11)

Report Findings

  • The CAP report found that immediate expensing for new multifamily rental housing, with a per-unit cap of $150K-$250K, could spur the creation of 706,000 to 1.06 million new homes over 10 years, at a cost of up to $206 billion. (PoliticoPro, March 12)
  • The researchers claim that faster cost recovery would lower the cost of capital, improve project cash flow, and help move more rental developments from infeasible to financeable.
  • The research also shows that full or partial expensing could increase housing supply at a lower cost per unit than many direct subsidy programs. (Tax Policy Center, March 17)
  • The researchers’ preferred approach would cap immediate expensing at $150,000 per unit, paired with a refundable credit option to address the fact that many real estate investors are tax-exempt or otherwise unable to use additional tax deductions. They estimate the proposal could produce roughly 755,000 new homes over a decade for about $154 billion.
  • The proposal also parallels last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which provided full expensing for new factories. The Tax Foundation called that change a step forward, but said its economic benefits would be limited because it is temporary and narrowly targeted. (Tax Foundation, Oct. 27, 2025)
  • The Tax Foundation published a reply to the CAP report that generally supports the approach while outlining a variety of cost recovery reform options for policymakers to consider, including: neutral cost recovery, and investment tax credit, tax deduction transferability, shorter asset lives, and partial expensing. (The Tax Foundation, Mar. 23)
  • The recent reports by the two influential think tanks are further evidence that policymakers are open to new approaches aimed at addressing housing affordability challenges.

On the Hill

  • Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE) introduced the Rental Housing Investment Act on March 12, which would allow builders to immediately deduct a portion of new multifamily construction costs rather than recover them over 27.5 years. (Sen. Rochester News Release, Mar. 12)
  • The bill would allow builders to immediately deduct up to $150,000 per unit in construction costs, with an enhanced deduction of up to $250,000 per unit for projects that include income-restricted units under long-term attainability commitments. The incentive would apply only to newly constructed multifamily rental housing. (USA Today, Mar. 11)
  • The measure is intended to support efforts to expand rental supply and address affordability pressures by improving the tax treatment of new multifamily development, as high interest rates and rising construction costs continue to weigh on housing production.

Property Conversions

  • Office conversions now account for nearly half of all future adaptive reuse projects. (CRE Daily, Mar. 25)
  • RentCafe reported that 90,300 apartments were in the conversion pipeline nationwide at the start of 2026, up 28% from 70,600 a year earlier, as the trend continues to gain momentum in both major and mid-sized markets. (RentCafe, Mar. 24)
  • New York leads the pipeline, followed by Washington, D.C., and Chicago. (Bisnow, March 26 | Cushman & Wakefield, Feb. 2026)
  • New research from Pew and Gensler highlights office-to-residential conversions, particularly lower-cost co-living microapartments in underused downtown buildings.  (Pew Research, Mar. 24)
  • Pew found the model could cut per-unit development costs by more than half in some markets and deliver nearly four times as many affordable homes per subsidy dollar compared to traditional studio development. (Pew Research, Mar. 24)
  • RER has strongly backed the bipartisan Revitalizing Downtowns and Main Streets Act of 2025 (H.R. 2410), which would create a market-based tax incentive for converting older commercial buildings to residential use to help expand housing and support the recovery of downtowns and neighborhoods still feeling the effects of the pandemic. (Roundtable Weekly, Mar. 2025)

RER will continue working with policymakers to advance tax and regulatory policies that encourage property conversions, reduce barriers to development, and help expand the nation’s housing supply.

House Weighs Next Move on ROAD to Housing Act

Posted on by abigail_grenadier

The bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act remains in limbo in the House, where lawmakers are still weighing how to reconcile the Senate-passed package with the chamber’s own housing bill. The Senate approved its version two weeks ago after combining House priorities with the upper chamber’s broader housing agenda, but House members have raised concerns about several provisions added or revised in the Senate package—most notably the bill’s treatment of build-to-rent (BTR) housing.

State of Play

  • The House and Senate remain at odds over how to advance the housing package after the Senate passed its bill with overwhelming bipartisan support earlier this month. (PoliticoPro, Mar. 23)
  • House Financial Services Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) urged House Democrats this week to support a formal conference committee, arguing that the final bill should restore House priorities and address stakeholder concerns—an apparent reference to the Senate bill’s restrictions on large institutional investors in single-family housing.
  • Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) said Wednesday that Senate Banking and House Financial Services leaders need to meet to resolve key differences between the two packages.
  • Rep. Flood identified three major House concerns with the Senate bill: the need to preserve but revise the provision restricting institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes, the omission of environmental review changes for certain affordable housing programs, and the Senate’s inclusion of a temporary rather than permanent restriction on a Federal Reserve central bank digital currency. (PoliticoPro | Watch Rep. Flood Remarks, Mar. 25)

Build-to-Rent

  • The biggest sticking point remains the Senate bill’s requirement that rental homes developed by large investors be sold to individual homebuyers after seven years. (The Urban Institute, Mar. 17)
  • House Republicans have raised concerns that the provision could undercut new rental housing production, disrupt financing, and introduce significant long-term uncertainty into the market.
  • The Real Estate Roundtable (RER) has warned that the bill’s forced-sale structure raises serious constitutional concerns and could trigger years of litigation involving property owners, tenants, and the federal government.

New BTR Research

  • Based on a March 19 discussion with 146 BTR executives, developers, and capital partners, the firm reported this week that the Senate bill’s seven-year disposal requirement has already frozen capital and halted new development ahead of enactment. Some capital will not return even if the bill is altered, reflecting ongoing concerns about future policy risk. (John Burns Research & Consulting, Mar. 24)

RER Advocacy

  • RER and a broad real estate coalition have spent weeks urging lawmakers to preserve the housing bill’s supply-focused provisions while removing language that would force large investors to sell newly built single-family rental homes after seven years. (Roundtable Weekly, Jan. 9 | Jan. 16 |  Jan. 23 | Feb. 27| Mar. 6 | Mar. 13 | Mar. 20)
  • In March, RER joined a series of coalition letters urging senators to remove or revise Section 901, warning that the seven-year sale requirement would effectively eliminate the production of BTR housing. (Roundtable Weekly, Mar. 20) (Letter, Mar. 5 | Letter, Mar. 13)
  • That message was reinforced again this week in an open letter from housing policy researchers, who warned that the Senate-passed ROAD to Housing Act would undermine BTR housing, which represents a growing source of new supply in markets where housing is already out of reach for many households. (Letter, Mar. 26)
  • The researchers said BTR has helped expand the housing stock, particularly for middle-income renters seeking single-family-style housing, and cautioned that the bill’s seven-year sale mandate would disrupt the model’s economics and reduce future production.
  • The letter also noted that many BTR communities are not structured to be sold off unit-by-unit, making the requirement especially problematic in practice.

What’s Next

  • The House and Senate are out on recess and do not return to Washington until April 14, leaving the future of the broader housing package uncertain. (NYT, Mar. 25)

Whether lawmakers pursue a formal conference or a narrower compromise, RER will continue urging Congress to preserve the bill’s pro-supply provisions while removing language that would reduce rental-housing production and make it more difficult to meet the nation’s growing housing needs.